This fixes the failures in bug 1671573 and just works thanks to the
invalidation improvements I did for :is / :where.
Added a couple tests for invalidation which is the tricky bit. 001 is a
very straight-forward test, 002 is the :is test but with :is() replaced
by double-:not().
This also fixes default namespaces inside :is() / :where(), which are
supposed to get ignored, but aren't. Added tests for that and for the
pre-existing :not() behavior which Chrome doesn't quite get right.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D94142
Which allows to run CSS.supports in chrome/user-agent context. We should
probably add a couple more tweaks for stuff like quirks or what not (the
`ParsingMode` enum), but that seem lower priority.
I only added the one-value version of CSS.supports because it should be enough
and supporting the two value version required a bit of awkward code due to when
we parse the CSS property name right now.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D92585
This renames the internal -moz-math-script-level property in order to
prepare for full math-depth support. Currently, the property is guarded
under a disabled-by-default flag, so there should be no observable
behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91285
This renames the internal -moz-math-script-level property in order to
prepare for full math-depth support. Currently, the property is guarded
under a disabled-by-default flag, so there should be no observable
behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91285
This renames the internal -moz-math-script-level property in order to
prepare for full math-depth support. Currently, the property is guarded
under a disabled-by-default flag, so there should be no observable
behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91285
This renames the internal -moz-math-script-level property in order to
prepare for full math-depth support. Currently, the property is guarded
under a disabled-by-default flag, so there should be no observable
behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91285
We calculate the size of ratio-dependent axis by aspect-ratio while
initializing its ReflowInput, for most of the basic block cases.
This patch doesn't include "Automatic content-based minimum sizes",
which will be handled later. Besides, replaced elements will be handled
later as well.
We don't pass abspos-004.tentative.html because there is still a
spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5151.
For other tests we didn't pass (e.g. block-aspect-ratio-009.tentative.html,
or replaced-element-00x.tentative.html), we fix them later.
Besides, in this patch, we don't handle the case if the size of
ratio-determining axis uses intrinsic size keywords (which needs to be
calculated by its content size). We will fix this in the following bug
(Bug 1646100).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D78964
Also, for changes in CSS declarations, like changing
cssRules[i].style.color or something, we end up avoiding a lot of the
work we were doing.
This page still trips us in the sense that they add a stylesheet, then
call getBoundingClientRect(), then insert more rules in the stylesheet,
which causes us to rebuild a lot of the cascade data.
We could try to detect appends to the last stylesheet on the list or
something I guess, and avoid rebuilding the cascade data in some cases.
Depends on D85615
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D85616
This avoids arbitrary precision loss when computing REM units and so on,
which is particularly important if we ever change the base of our app
units (but useful regardless).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D79928
This avoids arbitrary precision loss when computing REM units and so on,
which is particularly important if we ever change the base of our app
units (but useful regardless).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D79928
In order to test its parsing and serialization, we expose it but protect
it behind a pref.
Besides, I would like to drop layout.css.aspect-ratio-number.enabled in
the next patch because the spec has been updated. It seems we don't have
to keep this pref and we should always use Number.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D74955
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Dzmitry Malyshau
Boris Chiou
Frederic Wang
Narcis Beleuzu
Mihai Alexandru Michis
Razvan Maries
Nicolas Silva
Csoregi Natalia
Dorel Luca
Cristina Coroiu
Brian Birtles
Cameron McCormack
Simon Giesecke
Zeke Medley
Cosmin Sabou
Philipp Zech
Bogdan Tara