The naming scheme references the hashchange event. This is required by the
extensions framework to call the appropriate navigation listeners when only
the reference fragment is updated by a navigation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108725
The naming scheme references the hashchange event. This is required by the
extensions framework to call the appropriate navigation listeners when only
the reference fragment is updated by a navigation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108725
The naming scheme references the hashchange event. This is required by the
extensions framework to call the appropriate navigation listeners when only
the reference fragment is updated by a navigation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108725
The naming scheme references the hashchange event. This is required by the
extensions framework to call the appropriate navigation listeners when only
the reference fragment is updated by a navigation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D108725
This makes the naming more consistent with other functions called
Insert and/or Update. Also, it removes the ambiguity whether
Put expects that an entry already exists or not, in particular because
it differed from nsTHashtable::PutEntry in that regard.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105473
This passes around the "are we external" bit of load information a bunch,
such that the external protocol handling code has access to it.
In this bug and bug 1667468, I think ideally I would have used a check
if we're the OS default for a given protocol before continuing. However,
this information is currently unavailable on Linux (bug 1599713), and
worse, I believe is likely to remain unavailable in flatpak and other
such restricted environments (cf. bug 1618094 - we aren't able to find
out anything about protocol handlers from the OS).
So instead, we prompt the user if we are about to open a link passed
to us externally. There is a small chance this will be Breaking People's
Workflows, where I don't know whether anyone relies on Firefox happily
passing these URIs along to the relevant application (more convenient
than doing all the registry/API work yourself in scripts!) or anything
like that. To help with that, there's a pref,
`network.protocol-handler.prompt-from-external`, that can be created and
set to false to avoid prompting in this case.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D103967
I am not conviced that we have all the correct MIME types and extensions here.
It also extremely hard to figure out what the correct information is.
We should drop this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D105358
This passes around the "are we external" bit of load information a bunch,
such that the external protocol handling code has access to it.
In this bug and bug 1667468, I think ideally I would have used a check
if we're the OS default for a given protocol before continuing. However,
this information is currently unavailable on Linux (bug 1599713), and
worse, I believe is likely to remain unavailable in flatpak and other
such restricted environments (cf. bug 1618094 - we aren't able to find
out anything about protocol handlers from the OS).
So instead, we prompt the user if we are about to open a link passed
to us externally. There is a small chance this will be Breaking People's
Workflows, where I don't know whether anyone relies on Firefox happily
passing these URIs along to the relevant application (more convenient
than doing all the registry/API work yourself in scripts!) or anything
like that. To help with that, there's a pref,
`network.protocol-handler.prompt-from-external`, that can be created and
set to false to avoid prompting in this case.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D103967
I was hitting the assertion and was investigating a bit. This makes the
registration a bit faster, but doesn't change behavior.
Depends on D103567
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D103568
This is an issue I found while going through this code and
writing/debugging a test for the bug at hand. Without this, the test in
the actual fix for this bug will fail to actually reuse the preloaded
stylesheet.
It seems reasonable to assume that the intersection of quirks mode
documents using link preload headers is small (and in that case we'd
parse the sheet twice, but oh well).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D103567
Bug 1643204 really only papered over the issue of the active state being
messed up / the document becoming visible internally without notifying
media.
Bug 1572798 notifies media properly so that the visibility state is
consistent with what media thinks the visibility state is, so I think
there's no longer a reason to do this.
No other browser passes the test added in bug 1643204.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D100836
To clarify the two separate SubDialog managers managed by TabDialogManager, this patch renames `_.dialogManager` to `._tabDialogManager`.
Depends on D100066
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D100955
To clarify the two separate SubDialog managers managed by TabDialogManager, this patch renames `_.dialogManager` to `._tabDialogManager`.
Depends on D100066
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D100955
Kris Maglione
Simon Giesecke
Csoregi Natalia
Cosmin Sabou
Mark Banner
Narcis Beleuzu
Agi Sferro
Valentin Gosu
Gijs Kruitbosch
Alexis Beingessner
Tom Schuster
Markus Stange
smolnar
Sylvestre Ledru
longsonr
Barret Rennie
Noemi Erli
Moritz Birghan
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Butkovits Atila
Paul Zuehlcke
Micah Tigley
Bogdan Tara