To reduce QI, I would like to replace nsIDOMNode with nsINode. And some
parameters in *DataTransder.cpp's methods is unused (it uses as nullptr),
so we should remove these parameters.
Also nsIDOMNodeList is unused now, so we should remove this including.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1QTIkxDazjJ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3961e897fcaa96975facc822821f1e223cab358d
HTMLEditor::InsertNodeAtPoint() should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as
an argument which specifies point to insert. Additionally, it should take
|EditorDOMPoint*| to return the next point of actual insertion point.
Additionally, this patch renames it to InsertNodeAtProperAncestor() for
explaining what it will do.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HYUzSlyPxAd
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 57033cdc4458b45a5fe9d6aa642c185133a79304
Currently, HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak() checks if the editing host can
contain a <p> element as a child or a descendant. However, this is not enough.
If an inline element has a block element which can contain a <p> element,
current implementation considers to insert a <br>. This is possible when
* The editing host is an unknown element including user defined element.
* The editing host is an inline element and its children and/or descendants
were added by JS. E.g., <span contenteditable> element can have <div>
element.
I think that we should consider to insert a <br> element when:
- There is no block ancestors in the editing host.
- The editing host is the only block element and it cannot contain <p> element
or the default paragraph separator is <br> element.
- The nearest block ancestor isn't a single-line container declared in the
execCommand spec and there are no block elements which can contain <p>
element.
Note that Chromium checks if CSS box of ancestors is block too. However,
it must be out of scope of this bug.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HdjU9t83Nd1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7030671268a610613359b5d8ae5d126e120f59bd
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
--HG--
rename : xpcom/ds/nsIAtom.h => xpcom/ds/nsAtom.h
extra : rebase_source : ac3e904a21b8b48e74534fff964f1623ee937c67
This patch merges nsAtom into nsIAtom. For the moment, both names can be used
interchangeably due to a typedef. The patch also devirtualizes nsIAtom, by
making it not inherit from nsISupports, removing NS_DECL_NSIATOM, and dropping
the use of NS_IMETHOD_. It also removes nsIAtom's IIDs.
These changes trigger knock-on changes throughout the codebase, changing the
types of lots of things as follows.
- nsCOMPtr<nsIAtom> --> RefPtr<nsIAtom>
- nsCOMArray<nsIAtom> --> nsTArray<RefPtr<nsIAtom>>
- Count() --> Length()
- ObjectAt() --> ElementAt()
- AppendObject() --> AppendElement()
- RemoveObjectAt() --> RemoveElementAt()
- ns*Hashtable<nsISupportsHashKey, ...> -->
ns*Hashtable<nsRefPtrHashKey<nsIAtom>, ...>
- nsInterfaceHashtable<T, nsIAtom> --> nsRefPtrHashtable<T, nsIAtom>
- This requires adding a Get() method to nsRefPtrHashtable that it lacks but
nsInterfaceHashtable has.
- nsCOMPtr<nsIMutableArray> --> nsTArray<RefPtr<nsIAtom>>
- nsArrayBase::Create() --> nsTArray()
- GetLength() --> Length()
- do_QueryElementAt() --> operator[]
The patch also has some changes to Rust code that manipulates nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DykOl8aEnUJ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 254404e318e94b4c93ec8d4081ff0f0fda8aa7d1
I've been having problems with interdiffs on mozreview lately, so for
ease of review, this patch is being submitted as a seperate patch for
review. Once it is r+'d, it will be folded into the first patch in
this set before landing.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CS9MngaXlBd
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6a86fd4f7a66e73497a756976a2562d183002a2a
Before I will fix some justify* command's bug, I would like to clean up HTMLEditRules::RemoveAlignment to get rid of nsIDOM* into this method.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4UATycS5iBl
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7079a774b4b8359aeffbdbdf2efe0b45bd92c173
Currently, editor code uses following style (or similar style) in a lot of places:
if (foo)
{
}
else
{
}
This patch fixes this as conforming to our coding rules, i.e., it becomes:
if (foo) {
} else {
}
Additionally, this fixes other odd control statements in the files which include above issue because it's difficult to find following issues with searching the files:
* if (foo) bar;
* if (foo) { bar; }
* if (foo)
bar;
Finally, if it becomes much simpler than current code, this patch rewrites existing code with "early return style". But this case is only a few places because this is risky.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2Gs26goWXrF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 603f9003a3566b3203bdeb27dc73ac33502d2853
This patch also renames:
EditorInputEventDispatcher -> mozilla::EditorInputEventDispatcher
And some variable names are renamed from aEditor or mEditor to aEditorBase or mEditorBase for making their types clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2FCXWpLMn8e
--HG--
rename : editor/libeditor/nsEditor.cpp => editor/libeditor/EditorBase.cpp
rename : editor/libeditor/nsEditor.h => editor/libeditor/EditorBase.h
Makoto Kato
Boris Zbarsky
Masayuki Nakano
Olli Pettay
Nicholas Nethercote
Sebastian Hengst
Kyle Machulis
David Major
Tim Nguyen