HTMLEditRules::StandardBreakImpl() should take |const EditorDOMPoint&| to
specify where a new <br> element inserted before.
Additionally, we should rename it to InsertBRElement().
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4BR7xGFFrpk
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 873af2c4167227a570878fe03d6dec61dffe9528
TextEditRules has some wrappers of TextEditor::CreateBR(). Also they should
take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| to specify the insertion point of new <br>
element.
Additionally, this patch makes them just return add-refed Element instead of
nsresult. So, we can get rid of out param from it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3wfKGaTM89c
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 47f0d89bc16f0858c7141b2035164adb9105493c
TextEditor::CreateBR() should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| to specify the
insertion point instead of a set of container node and offset in it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4PrWzwmIgfD
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c509907002693f3b77cd00bf77cfd0f26704fd65
Different from RangeBoundaryBase, EditorDOMPointBase can store only child node.
I.e., mOffset may be invalid until its Offset() is called. So,
GetChildAtOffset() isn't good name. It should be just GetChild().
Similarly, GetNextSiblingOfChildAtOffset() and
GetPreviousSiblingOfChildAtOffset() should be renamed to GetNextSiblingOfChild()
and GetPreviousSiblingOfChild().
MozReview-Commit-ID: WpkPmDwkrL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2be1fcbee129f4c96e9b166be5a924845340708f
EditorDOMPointBase::Container() may return nullptr. So, it should be renamed
to GetContainer().
Then, the method name becomes longer and a lot of callers access the result
directly. So, there should be following methods to make the callers shorter:
- GetContainerAsContent() to return the container as nsIContent*.
- GetContainerAsElement() to return the container as dom::Element*.
- GetContainerAsText() to return the container as dom::Text.
- GetContainerAsDOMNode() to return the container as nsIDOMNode*.
- CanContainerHaveChildren() to check if the container can have child nodes.
- IsInDataNode() to check if the point is in a data node including text node.
- IsInTextNode() to check if the point is in a text node.
- IsContainerHTMLElement() to check if the container is specific HTML element.
- IsContainerAnyOfHTMLElements() to check if the container is one of the
specified HTML elements.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LkN2WBbCPj0
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9da1e70d4c74f7ad573e244cf6c7b21a0c7b4410
Editor code sometimes sets a DOM point to end of a node. In this case, we
need to write |Set(node, node->Length())|. So, it should have
|void SetToEndOf(const nsINode* aContainer)| for making meaning of the code
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91shMCD2d84
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3401af50aabc1b677deeae664e8c56506182d28c
Even after EditorBase::DeleteSelectionAndCreateElement() creates a new element,
it tries to collapse selection with |pointToInsert| which is outdated after
inserting new element.
So, it should recompute the caret position with new DOM tree.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DKh2uhItIol
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c0c30e1c809784af64e87596b471c472350857a8
nsRange::SetStart(), nsRange::SetEnd(), nsRange::IsPointInRange() and
nsRange::ComparePoint() take a set of container node and offset in it to
specifying a DOM point. However, the caller may not have computed the offset
but may know the child node at the point. In such case, they can avoid
computing the offset with nsINode::IndexOf() if they have overloads which
take RawRangeBoundary.
Therefore, this patch implements the overloads and changes the callers in
editor.
MozReview-Commit-ID: E4DLbAgTTCI
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8d1632a030f1e0a0dd2b81c3996c19d427e8b0bd
Some methods of editor retrieves anchor and focus of selection. However, there
are no methods which directly access RangeBoundary of anchor and focus.
This patch adds it for making editor code simpler and avoiding unnecessary
child offset computation.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EvepQpFMi8S
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 38f3c506db5c9d8790bbd625d552bfbc8d99cebc
HTMLEditor::NormalizeEOLInsertPosition() takes a set of container node and
offset in it for specifying insertion point. So, this should be replaced
with |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| and it should return |EditorDOMPoint| rather
than modifying the argument.
Additionally, perhaps, GetBetterInsertionPointFor() is better name for it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IB1FhrkzK2G
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 55f8c1d9fa1f149e81114c929f6e6232aba03905
HTMLEditor::InsertNodeAtPoint() should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as
an argument which specifies point to insert. Additionally, it should take
|EditorDOMPoint*| to return the next point of actual insertion point.
Additionally, this patch renames it to InsertNodeAtProperAncestor() for
explaining what it will do.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HYUzSlyPxAd
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 57033cdc4458b45a5fe9d6aa642c185133a79304
Although nsIEditActionListener::WillInsertNode() nobody implements actually,
we should remove it in a follow up bug.
nsIEditActionListener::DidInsertNode() is implemented only by HTMLEditRules.
So, if we make it not use nsIEditActionListener, we can remove it too.
However, keep it for now.
On the other hand, they don't need to receive index of the insertion point.
WillInsertNode() needs next sibling of the insert point, but DidInsertNode()
needs nothing because listener can compute it with new inserted node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GiTKkVyZJlN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9ee38c28217d25d1a3f79b0b458c7b2121350a76
EditorBase::CreateTxnForInsertNode() and EditorBase::InsertNode() should take
|const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as an argument specifying point to insert.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KhK19xS7wXb
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f7b08b7d049eef8a9c03ee681e53e8d469915b15
Like CreateNodeTransaction, InsertNodeTransaction should use EditorRawDOMPoint
for temporary variable and arguments of its methods and should use RangeBoudary
to store it as its member.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FCGY8x97egb
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bd5ce45944b8b367afc9b782e881727061d83035
EditorDOMPoint was a subclass of RangeBoundary. Therefore, for heavy
use of it in editor, we've implemented a lot of complicated feature
into RangeBoundary. However, EditorDOMPoint stopped inheriting
RangeBoundary. So, we can get simple RangeBoundary implementation
back now.
This patch makes RangeBoundary.h almost same as 3f7cbec2446b except
keeps implementing GetPreviousSiblingOfChildAtOffset() and
GetNextSiblingOfChildAtOffset() because the former is used by
Selection and both of them are simple. And also keeps making it
a friend of EditorDOMPoint because EditorDOMPoint still needs to
copy to/from RangeBoundary.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Hr5SA52ScK0
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a00a46ff931a5c4fcabf910510fa448b513f50c5
The name, WSRunObject::CheckTrailingNBSP(), is unclear what it does. It
replaces previous character of specified point with ASCII space if it is NBSP
and it's not necessary.
So, it should be renamed to ReplacePreviousNBSPIfUnncessary().
Additionally, it should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| instead of a set of
container node and offset in it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2vq46OiAzo6
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 132bb71361ff1e60268863cd4ef86bfbd0ddc9d1
WSRunObject::GetChar(After|Before)(nsINode*, int32_t) returns next/previous
character's DOM point as WSPoint. If the container node is a text node in
mNodeArray, it calls WSRunObject::GetChar(After|Before)(const WSPoint&) which
returns next/previous offset if the point isn't end/start of the text node.
If the point is at end/start of the text node, it returns start/end of
next/previous text node in mNodeArray. If the container node is not a text
node in mNodeArray, it calls WSRunObject::GetWSPoint(After|Before)(). It looks
for next/previous text node in mNodeArray from the point. Then, it calls
WSRunObject::GetChar(After|Before)(const WSPoint&) and returns the result.
So, we should rename GetCharAfter() to GetNextCharPoint(), GetCharBefore() to
GetPreviousCharPoint(), GetWSPointAfter() to GetNextCharPointInternal() and
GetWSPointBefore() to GetPreviousCharPointInternal().
Then, they should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| instead of a set of container
node and offset in it.
So, looks like that "WS"RunObject is not good name for this class, perhaps,
AutoTextRunManager or something? But I'm still not sure.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 85cX3MdlFwz
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 217dbb75653bf2a4c593fb9a0498824b1b764cf4
WSRunObject::DeleteChars() should take two |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| arguments
to represent a range to remove.
Additionally, this renames it to DeleteRange() because it also removes any
nodes in the range. So, "Chars" isn't good word for this method's name.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5Dmxnia1JPO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a4fd44c9354762db0e37fa156790dc20fdbe23a1
WSRunObject::FindRun() finds the nearest run from aPoint to specified direction.
So, it uses nsContentUtils::ComparePoints() a lot. Therefore, it should use
an overload which takes RawRangeBoundary. Although, it's not optimized for
RawRangeBoundary, but if it'd be optimized, this method becomes faster.
And this patch renames it to FindNearestRun().
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2NkR5E1st6d
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 387ecc9d483c7cd88306197391fc2940b2000e28
WSRunObject::InsertBreak() should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| instead of
a pair of container node and offset in it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 38OAn4dvR7x
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8e48ba2cec07c1dd4daf3cd9ec44751c860bc3da
TextEditor::CreateBRImpl() should take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as insertion
point of new <br> element. Additionally, it doesn't need to have out argument
for the point of after <br> element because callers can get it with
EditorRawDOMPoint(nsINode*) and the new <br> node, and calling AdvanceOffset().
This cost must be enough cheap.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Hxawz3D2dCd
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 866ff50efd70499ed733da9efcce7399f44bd4a0
While moving children of a container to another container, mutation observer
may move children before moving and/or move node immediately after the
insertion point. Therefore, EditorBase should store all children which
should be moved with a local variable. Then, move one by one carefully.
E.g., if a child before being moved is moved to different container, it
shouldn't be moved because JS already handles it as expected for the web
app. If next sibling of the insertion point has been moved, EditorBase
should stop moving the remaining children because it may move children to
odd position and it may cause dataloss.
This patch creates EditorBase::MoveChildren() and it moves children carefully
with above checks. Additionally, making its callers simpler, this patch also
creates EditorBase::MovePreviousSiblings() and MoveAllChildren().
MozReview-Commit-ID: FJDdSqXIlqD
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 54bded29dbbd9547339a2c6e1a1264e22fbdc740
CreateElementTransaction and SplitNodeTransaction store DOM point with
RangeBoundary now. However, it refers next child of referring point.
Therefore, if it's moved to different container or removed from the DOM
tree, they cannot do undo/redo. We can say for the child node, however,
it doesn't make sense depending on a node which is not directly referring.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Baohbub3RNZ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6776420271cdaf91aae6213fb6e1bcf1841112b1
EditorDOMPointBase should store child node at offset directly rather than
previous sibling of child node at offset because if referring child node or
its previous sibling is moved to different DOM point,
EditorDOMPointBase::GetChildAtOffset() may return different node. However,
users of this class assumes that after it stores child node at offset, it'll
return same node.
So, EditorDOMPointBase should store child node instead of "ref". Additionally,
when it stores nullptr as the child, it should set mOffset to length of the
mContainer because it means it refers after the last child.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7ZdkwKLJEjo
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c2a0a1be1285466e5fa96162779e86c37ae78655
EditorDOMPointBase should store child at offset for editor uses. E.g., when
editor wants to refer a node as child node of an EditorDOMPoint instance,
even if the node is unexpectedly moved to different container, editor wants
to keep referring the child node rather than its previous sibling.
Therefore this patch makes EditorDOMPointBase not a sub class of
RangeBoundaryBase but copying all methods and members of RangeBoundaryBase
into EditorDOMPointBase for keeping current behavior completely.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LIyPFkCfsZ9
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fd76c4808625f8f8a86f7b4e4c1ac22fbdc11dd5
There are 3 spam warning assertion in EditorDOMPointBase.
One is in constructor. Which warns if IsSet() returns false, but it checks
before finishing initializing.
The others are in IsStartOfContainer() and IsEndOfContainer(). They try to
check if mOffset is valid value with current DOM tree if it's initialized
when it's at start or end of the container. However, they do it even when
it's not start nor end of the container.
This patch fixes those spammers.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DvFa501m9V0
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c97ac371054a54eabc07b3ec726b924d6be61e25
No one uses nsIInlineSpellChecker.spellCheckAfterEditorChange from script.
So I think we can mark this interface as noscript.
Since this method is scriptable, we need QI to get nsIDOMNode. If we can
change to noscript, it can reduce QI to get nsIDOMNode.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GC0WuFyTlaZ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 16ca9fc548e86747ac17407be48295c709174fb5
Part 1. moves native dom method of CreateBR, so we should use it for
CreateMozBR, and use native dom as parameter.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DHUB88HfowQ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 00fefd12b50bef0f1a9bd69e1b7992a19999d42f
One of CreateBR is still virtual method, but it is unnecessary to use it.
So we should remove virtual keyword and remove override method.
Also, we should move native dom version of CreateBR to TextEditor to use it
on TextEdtitor.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GCazJtY4urV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8e0d71631f0070a928bc0f4817dd6efe7c833f1b
When TextEditor::CreateBRImpl() splits a text node before inserting new <br>
element, it initializes pointToInsertBrNode only with the right text node.
Then, it refers its Offset() after inserting new <br> node before the point.
Therefore, the offset is computed with the new DOM tree. So, adding 1 to
the offset is redundant only in this case.
So, before calling CreateNode(), it needs to make pointToInsertBrNode store
offset with calling its Offset().
Note that this ugly code will be replaced with patches for bug 1408227.
Additionally, this doesn't use AutoEditorDOMPointChildInvalidator because
it's not available in 58 but we need to uplift this patch.
Finally, I'm not sure how to check this in automated tests. Therefore, this
patch doesn't include automated tests.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IaQBonoGawR
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a89559932f27d98a02baf3e207c6be3c2a545aad
HTMLEditRules::MaybeSplitAncestorsForInsert() may be called with a point in a
text and it needs to return given split point as is. Additionally, the given
point may be in a text node. So, it may not be represented with an
nsCOMPtr<nsIContent>.
Therefore, we need to add new member, EditorDOMPoint, to SplitNodeResult and
when MaybeSplitAncestorsForInsert() needs to return the given point as is,
it should use it.
Note that if the methods which return SplitNodeResult split some nodes actually,
the left node and/or the right node may be removed from the DOM tree. In this
case, EditorDOMPoint cannot store such orphan node. Therefore, we cannot
make mNextNode nor mPreviousNode EditorDOMPoint.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LwH8RZzkrmT
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a5ae2328bef3d887c0bf4e1b9c4a4247b93a4ac0
Now, we can make HTMLEditRules::SplitAsNeeded() use |SplitNodeResult| as its
result and |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as specifying start of the deepest right
node. Then, the implementation becomes simpler.
And I think that we should rename it to MaybeSplitAncestorsForInsert().
Additionally, this patch makes it stop calling
EditorBase::IsDescendantOfEditorRoot() and HTMLEditor::GetActiveEditingHost()
because they are really expensive. Instead, it should check if the given start
point of the deepest right node is in active editing host before the loop and
if the loop reaches editing host.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KKpj5uyT2J
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0c9e9e9e28505b0fb5752e1cd4d42f64d22af3e7
In the following patch, we need to invalidate offset a lot of places after
splitting nodes. Therefore, there should be a helper stack class before that.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BgijAU7OizU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 520f29dacdffe5f7137ba7f11b289241b5fbface
First of all, this patches fixes a bug of EditorBase::CreateNode(). It takes
|EditorRawDOMPoint&| but it should be |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| for making
callers can specify temporary instances.
Next, this patch creates |SplitNodeResult| stack class for result of
EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep(). SplitNodeDeep() needs to return previous node
and next node of split point. They are called as left node and right node,
but these calls are really different term usage. Therefore, this patch names:
aOutLeftNode -> SplitNodeResult::GetPreviousNode()
aOutRightNode -> SplitNodeResult::GetNextNode()
and also declares SplitNodeResult::GetLeftNode() and
SplitNodeResult::GetRightNode() which are same meaning as left/right node of
other splitting methods.
Additionally, of course, this patch makes SplitNodeDeep() use
|const EditorRawDOMPoint&| to receive the start point of right node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FnJpeKgtzm4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3829e5528ef837b13fed305e0df1dbbf00e02a07
Make the loop in EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep() use EditorDOMPoint for making the
code simpler.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3do3rWV4eIh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 480a5b5b133d8a735bda6ddec07e4edf9ef34035
Now, we can merge two if blocks in the loop of EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep() and
get rid of |didSplit| variable.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LJZHF6x2GLR
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5f58508f6fc0928236252670c85383a13200fc2c
This doesn't change any meaning of the loop.
It is a bug if the loop meets orphan node before meeting the most ancestor
node to be split which is given as aNode. So, we can check it before trying
to split it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1TD7WHCoZh1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 17b8d7b3db458e29fb52be5cedb900560e1b70a4
EmptyContainers::yes and EmptyContainers::no are not so clear name what they
mean.
They means whether NodeSplitDeep() creates or won't create empty nodes when
split point is at start edge or end edge of an element.
This patch renames them to SplitAtEdges::eDoNotCreateEmptyContainer and
SplitAtEdges::eAllowToCreateEmptyContainer and make
HTMLEditor::InsertNodeAtPoint() use it instead of an bool argument.
Additionally, the argument of NodeSplitDeep() is now not optional because
this difference is really important when you read around the callers.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9hpMRkVDvCg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ee892361d66c9c9c5ed45ee9d3321474257ac417
Although, we need to make WSRunObject::PrepareToSplitAcrossBlocks() in
another bug, we should do it now for making HTMLEditRules::ReturnInParagraph()
implementation simpler.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AoMYqAEgCaV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cdfb16379f4ecab2a2694aeb283edd111fc81e95
nsIEditActionListner::DidSplitNode() takes 4 arguments, the right node,
old offset in the old right node before splitting, the new left node and
nsresult.
Computing offset for this doesn't make sense because it's always same as
the length of the left node. Additionally, nobody currently use nsersult.
So, we can get rid of it now.
Fortunately, nobody including comm-central and BlueGriffon implements
WillSplitNode(). So, we can get rid of it. However, removing interface
method should be done in a follow up bug. So, we can remove offset computation
in EditorBase::SplitNode() completely in the future.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JWj34SjBNJh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f0e1ed0e466dc8217c1a0ab1722790883a7efd1f
EditorBase::CreateTxnForSplitNode() and EditorBase::SplitNode() takes a set of
container and offset in it for specifying a point to split.
Instead, they should take EditorRawDOMPoint for specifying start of right node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5VwS8oudzIT
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 727948e5cf95f0713019f57ae9a007b85569fa56
Make SplitNodeTransaction stores start of existing right node (which will be
split) instead of split point as a pair of the right node and offset in it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2DIpJGSuNaC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 13949bdddc30c59462e7fea7fadf29f015ab8d3a
EditorBaseSplitNodeImpl() should be clean up with EditorDOMPoint which should
be an argument to point the first point of right node (existing split node).
MozReview-Commit-ID: DN0yHm9G9yT
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 256b4e2125e831b7be9e5c4aefc6f04c80e3c1f5
Masayuki Nakano
Sylvestre Ledru
Neil Deakin
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Brindusan Cristian
Olli Pettay
Edgar Chen
Makoto Kato