The math-depth implementation is refined to take into account the
ScriptPercentScaleDown and ScriptScriptPercentScaleDown constants (if the
parent's first valid font has a MATH table) in order to calculate the
scale factor between math-deth 0 and 1, and between 0 and 2 respectively.
Behavior is unchanged if the legacy scriptsizemultiplier attribute is
specified or if no MATH table is available.
The preference layout.css.math-depth.enabled remains disabled in nightly
until the remaining bit (support for font-size: math) is implemented in
bug 1667090.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D91604
Adds trait ZeroNoPercent to check for values that are 0 (such as 0px) but not 0%
Updated test css/css-transforms/animation/translate-interpolation.html and removed unnecessary formatting changes
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154930
These are gated by the same layout.css.font-tech.enabled pref as the
closely-related `tech()` function for the @font-face src descriptor;
once the spec questions are settled, we should enable them all together.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155359
These are gated by the same layout.css.font-tech.enabled pref as the
closely-related `tech()` function for the @font-face src descriptor;
once the spec questions are settled, we should enable them all together.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155359
There are a couple of current issues/discussions that may lead to a change in the set of supported keywords, so we may want to hold back a little on actually shipping this.
- In https://github.com/w3c/IFT/pull/113, the WebFonts WG proposes several new incremental-* keywords (and maybe implies dropping the currently-defined incremental?)
- In https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7633, I just proposed renaming the feature-* keywords to features-* (plural) for better readability; I'd like to see a decision on that before we ship this to release.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D155458
This patch will use the width/height attributes from <source> to override
width/height/aspect-ratio CSS property values of <img> elements.
So basically, we need to introduce an extra nsMappedAttribtue member in
HTMLSourceElement (and it only stores width and height attributes).
And then we use it as an extra declarations (which are generated by
Gecko_GetExtraContentStyleDeclarations()) so we can override the
declarations created from presentation attributes of <img>.
Besides, we need to make sure <img> elements get restyled in the
following cases:
1. width/height attributes is changed in <source> elements
2. <source> is inserted as a <picture>'s child
3. <source> is removed from the child list of <picture>
4. <img> is inserted as a <picture>'s child
5. <img> is removed from the child list of <picture>
We make the responsive source synchronously get updated in the previous patch,
so now we can just restyle the image when updating its responsive source.
Note: We fix the reflection of percentages for width/height attributes in
the next patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D152586
Fix some tests to:
* Not assume `double` precision.
* Account for recent working group resolution with regards to NaN: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7067#issuecomment-1111211295
Not sure I caught all, but normalizing to 0 was already our existing
behavior. This feature needs more work before it can be enabled more
generally, so make it nightly-only, for now.
Also, it's unclear per spec what the serialization for infinity*1s or so
should be. Right now we serialize to <very-big-number>s, which seems
reasonable, but some tests (but not others!) expect different behavior.
I left those untouched for now.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154883
We now have test coverage, so let's do this.
The remaining failures are just about infinity/nan, which is a
completely different feature.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154831
Fix some tests to:
* Not assume `double` precision.
* Account for recent working group resolution with regards to NaN: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7067#issuecomment-1111211295
Not sure I caught all, but normalizing to 0 was already our existing
behavior. This feature needs more work before it can be enabled more
generally, so make it nightly-only, for now.
Also, it's unclear per spec what the serialization for infinity*1s or so
should be. Right now we serialize to <very-big-number>s, which seems
reasonable, but some tests (but not others!) expect different behavior.
I left those untouched for now.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154883
We now have test coverage, so let's do this.
The remaining failures are just about infinity/nan, which is a
completely different feature.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154831
This makes it easier to get parity between legacy and regular flex
without having to either have tons of arbitrary attribute selectors in
the xul sheet, nor adding attribute lookup hacks to the html flexbox
layout.
Also, reimplement the remaining supported flex attribute-values (0 and 1)
purely in terms of CSS rules in xul.css (regardless of whether
emulate-moz-box-with-flex is enabled).
In practice these are pretty uncommon and the style attribute does the
trick in every case I've tried.
Add a debug-only assertion to ensure we preserve behavior for now.
Add a new test with another behavior difference between flexbox
emulation and old xul layout because the old reftest now passes. Use
replaced elements, which in modern flex are treated differently.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154394
This makes it easier to get parity between legacy and regular flex
without having to either have tons of arbitrary attribute selectors in
the xul sheet, nor adding attribute lookup hacks to the html flexbox
layout.
Also, reimplement the remaining supported flex attribute-values (0 and 1)
purely in terms of CSS rules in xul.css (regardless of whether
emulate-moz-box-with-flex is enabled).
In practice these are pretty uncommon and the style attribute does the
trick in every case I've tried.
Add a debug-only assertion to ensure we preserve behavior for now.
Add a new test with another behavior difference between flexbox
emulation and old xul layout because the old reftest now passes. Use
replaced elements, which in modern flex are treated differently.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154394
Now that the style system has keywords for this, we don't need to define them in gfx
but can just use the enum directly. (No functional change, just code simplification.)
Depends on D154237
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154238
This aligns with CSS Fonts 4 (rather than Fonts 3) and with behavior in other browsers;
I don't expect any significant breakage, given that specifying multiple format strings
was never supported in other engines AFAIK, and never served any useful purpose.
Depends on D154234
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154235
Now that the style system has keywords for this, we don't need to define them in gfx
but can just use the enum directly. (No functional change, just code simplification.)
Depends on D154237
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154238
This aligns with CSS Fonts 4 (rather than Fonts 3) and with behavior in other browsers;
I don't expect any significant breakage, given that specifying multiple format strings
was never supported in other engines AFAIK, and never served any useful purpose.
Depends on D154234
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154235
Now that the style system has keywords for this, we don't need to define them in gfx
but can just use the enum directly. (No functional change, just code simplification.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154238
This aligns with CSS Fonts 4 (rather than Fonts 3) and with behavior in other browsers;
I don't expect any significant breakage, given that specifying multiple format strings
was never supported in other engines AFAIK, and never served any useful purpose.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154235
We have unshipped these since forever, no point in keeping the pref
around. Move the relevant tests to chrome ref/mochitests.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154152
We have unshipped these since forever, no point in keeping the pref
around. Move the relevant tests to chrome ref/mochitests.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154152
This matches what Linux and macOS do, and that allows the fix for bug 1782623
to work on Windows for unstyled selects.
This also simplifies the CSS (though it adds a new system color which is a bit
more annoying). I filed https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7561 to
propose adding a more generic way to do this in the future (not just for
Firefox).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D153549
When something switches to display: none, right now we rely on
StopAnimationsForElementsWithoutFrames(), which posts a restyle and the
previous ProcessPendingRestyles call was papering over it.
For other elements in the display none subtree it doesn't matter,
because we don't keep their styles around, but for the display: none
element themselves we do need to update transitions on time.
We could, possibly more generally, remove
StopAnimationsForElementsWithoutFrames() altogether and cancel
animations when we clear style data, perhaps... But that's probably
worth a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151600
Even we don't have internal aliases right now (and that seems a bit
silly) we do have pref-gated aliases. An alias ID passed to IsEnabled
with the wrong EnabledState would misbehave, assert, and crash.
Though we don't have such callers in the tree because InspectorUtils
passes only arguments that make us not look at the flags, it seems more
reliable this way.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D151594
So we can specify the keyframe-specific composite operation. However,
these is a spec issue about the default composite for CSS Animations:
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7476.
I choose to use auto as the default composite for missing keyframes to match
the definition in web-animations-1 because I think this makes more sense:
> If the keyframe-specific composite operation for a keyframe is not set, the
> composite operation specified for the keyframe effect as a whole is used for
> values specified in that keyframe.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D150808
This patch introduces animation-composition longhand but we don't
accept it in @keyframe rule for now. I will support this for @keyframe
in the patch series.
Besides, the shorthand of animation doesn't include animation-composition.
The spec issue is: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6946.
We could fix the shorthand once this spec issue gets updated.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D150299
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Jonathan Kew
Frederic Wang
Connor Pearson
AW255
Marian-Vasile Laza
Boris Chiou
Iulian Moraru
Cristian Tuns
Sandor Molnar
David Shin