After removing `optional` in Bug 1712804, we need to add a variant back
here because there's fallible dependencies. However, I've tweaked the
re-introduction of the feature to require a specific repercussion
message as well. This seemed like a decent tradeoff - the developer
becomes aware that the failure is bad, it has repercussions, but it's
not a blocking issue. Additionally, since we're printing pip's output,
the developer will be able to see the underlying error causing the
warning.
I also added comment functionality to requirements definitions to allow
adjacent documentation of why some requirements are fallible. (Related:
I'm looking forward to `mach_bootstrap` not needing to parse
requirements definitions. Almost there!)
Note that we'll temporarily lose the "pinned" nature of the
three moved dependencies until dependency locking is implemented
for Mach requirements definitions. Also note that the pinned
`zstandard_requirements.txt` can't be removed like the other
files because it still has a dangling usage.
Finally, in preparation for review: I didn't make
`PypiOptionalSpecifier` extend `PypiSpecifier` because I figured that
the benefit of flexibility (easier to allow implementations to diverge
without needing to untangle an inheritance relationship) was larger than
the cost of needing to add properties to both specifiers.
If we wanted re-use, I'd probably have `PypiOptionalSpecifier` _contain_
a `PypiSpecifier`, but then you have to reach deeper into the object to
get data, so *shrug*.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D119835
After removing `optional` in Bug 1712804, we need to add a variant back
here because there's fallible dependencies. However, I've tweaked the
re-introduction of the feature to require a specific repercussion
message as well. This seemed like a decent tradeoff - the developer
becomes aware that the failure is bad, it has repercussions, but it's
not a blocking issue. Additionally, since we're printing pip's output,
the developer will be able to see the underlying error causing the
warning.
I also added comment functionality to requirements definitions to allow
adjacent documentation of why some requirements are fallible. (Related:
I'm looking forward to `mach_bootstrap` not needing to parse
requirements definitions. Almost there!)
Note that we'll temporarily lose the "pinned" nature of the
three moved dependencies until dependency locking is implemented
for Mach requirements definitions. Also note that the pinned
`zstandard_requirements.txt` can't be removed like the other
files because it still has a dangling usage.
Finally, in preparation for review: I didn't make
`PypiOptionalSpecifier` extend `PypiSpecifier` because I figured that
the benefit of flexibility (easier to allow implementations to diverge
without needing to untangle an inheritance relationship) was larger than
the cost of needing to add properties to both specifiers.
If we wanted re-use, I'd probably have `PypiOptionalSpecifier` _contain_
a `PypiSpecifier`, but then you have to reach deeper into the object to
get data, so *shrug*.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D119835
After removing `optional` in Bug 1712804, we need to add a variant back
here because there's fallible dependencies. However, I've tweaked the
re-introduction of the feature to require a specific repercussion
message as well. This seemed like a decent tradeoff - the developer
becomes aware that the failure is bad, it has repercussions, but it's
not a blocking issue. Additionally, since we're printing pip's output,
the developer will be able to see the underlying error causing the
warning.
I also added comment functionality to requirements definitions to allow
adjacent documentation of why some requirements are fallible. (Related:
I'm looking forward to `mach_bootstrap` not needing to parse
requirements definitions. Almost there!)
Note that we'll temporarily lose the "pinned" nature of the
three moved dependencies until dependency locking is implemented
for Mach requirements definitions. Also note that the pinned
`zstandard_requirements.txt` can't be removed like the other
files because it still has a dangling usage.
Finally, in preparation for review: I didn't make
`PypiOptionalSpecifier` extend `PypiSpecifier` because I figured that
the benefit of flexibility (easier to allow implementations to diverge
without needing to untangle an inheritance relationship) was larger than
the cost of needing to add properties to both specifiers.
If we wanted re-use, I'd probably have `PypiOptionalSpecifier` _contain_
a `PypiSpecifier`, but then you have to reach deeper into the object to
get data, so *shrug*.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D119835
At the moment installing Python packages with native code is done by calling
`pip install <package>` and does not enforce any SHA hash for installed
dependencies, nor does it enforce a specific version to be installed.
This commit adds `requirements.in` and `requirements.txt` files for native
packages and changes these packages to be installed by running `pip install`
and passing the requirements file for the package. This allows us to pin the
SHA of the various dependencies. The `.txt` files are generated using
`pip-compile`.
We also add the new requirements files to the sparse profile for `mach`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D99912
Mike Hommey
Noemi Erli
Csoregi Natalia
Mitchell Hentges
Sandor Molnar
Cosmin Sabou
Connor Sheehan