The key here is to test the type of the variable declaration for being a
smartptr type, instead of testing the type of the variable _use_.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65581
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This was a bug in the original design that just hadn't shown up yet.
If I were to listen to, say "notification-a", and then try to remove
my listener for "notification-a" and "notification-b", we would end
up with a dead listener staying in the list. This fixes that.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KhYQSJaBDF9
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4605
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0e4d66fb7eab68c14fad10e3c5876bc491452e22
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6b5101e05d2f0588e831c0a7d1239a3dcb65ddcb
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cb13b24696ee97b611c318b407ea9c31215df3f6
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cb13b24696ee97b611c318b407ea9c31215df3f6
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7e140df5961c5a01c13b1fd2489905f61c83959f
Kagami Sascha Rosylight
Daisuke Akatsuka
Sylvestre Ledru
Butkovits Atila
Boris Zbarsky
Doug Thayer
Dorel Luca
Bogdan Tara
arthur.iakab