Currently, if you need to unmask all password characters, you need to call
`nsIEditor.unmask(0)`. However, this is ugly and this must be the most use
case. So, I think that we should make it optional.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39327
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
First, we need to make `nsCopySupport::FireClipboardEvent()` keep handling
`eCopy` and `eCut` event even in password field, only if `TextEditor` allows
them.
Then, we need to make `nsPlainTextSerializer::AppendText()` not expose
masked password for making users safer. Although `TextEditor` does not allow
`eCopy` nor `eCut` when selection is not in unmasked range. Fortunately,
retrieving masked and unmasked password from `nsTextFragment` has already
been implemented in `ContentEventHandler.cpp`. This patch moves it into
`EditorUtils` and makes `ContentEventHandler.cpp` and `nsPlaintextSerializer`
share it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39000
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It does not make sense to copy masked password with mask characters.
Therefore, we should allow users to copy/cut in password fields only when
selected range is in unmasked range.
Note that for web-compat, copy/cut are always enabled in HTML/XHTML document
in content. Therefore this patch changes the behavior only in chrome's
password fields.
Additionally, only the test uses `nsIEditor.canDelete()`. Therefore, this
removes it and make the test use `nsIDocShell.isCommandEnabled()` instead.
Unfortunately, `nsIEditor.canCopy()` and `nsIEditor.canCut()` are used by
BlueGriffon, therefore, we cannot get rid of them for now.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38999
--HG--
rename : editor/libeditor/tests/test_bug1067255.html => editor/libeditor/tests/test_cut_copy_delete_command_enabled.html
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
With the previous patches, editor has stopped masking characters in password
field. Instead, layout code needs to handle it. However, layout code
especially around `nsTextFrame` is performance critical area. Therefore,
layout code requires a quick way to check whether a text node in password
field or not.
This patch creates new flag for `CharacterData` node and marks all text nodes
whose characters should be masked with the flag when `EditorBase` or
`nsTextControlFrame` creates them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38006
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch creates editor API to get/set unmask-range of password field.
Its design is similar to `setSelectionRange()` and `selectionStart`/
`selectionEnd` attributes. The unmasked range is automatically
masked if `aTimeout` of `unmask()` is set to non-zero.
Otherwise, unmasked range won't be masked automatically even after user
or web apps modifies the editor, and inserting new character expands
unmasking range.
The following patch makes `TextEditRules` use these API to implement
delayed masking of password.
Note that editor has never supported dynamic `eEditorPasswordMask` change.
E.g., if you have typed some characters into an editor and toggle the flag,
the characters are not unmasked nor masked. Then, if you type new characters,
only they are correctly masked or unmasked. This patch puts `MOZ_ASSERT()`
to reject this feature completely on debug build for making the unmasking
implementation simpler.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38004
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In the next patch, we need to update unmasked range when anonymous text node
in `<input type="password">` is modified. This patch makes editor manage it
easier to update the range.
Note that the next patch also handles text node creation and destruction.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38003
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously, `runRemoveContentTest()` was the last test which synthesizes
composition in the `<textarea>`. However, new test order move it to middle
of the other tests. Then, it hits an `MOZ_ASSERT()` in
`TextComposition::EditorWillHandleCompositionChangeEvent()` that detects a
bug. When editable element is removed from the DOM tree during a composition,
editor cannot listen to `eCompositionEnd` event. Therefore, when the editor
gets back, it still has destroyed `TextComposition` and keeps handling new
composition with the old one. Therefore this patch makes
`EditorBase::InstallEventListeners()` forget the destroyed composition.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37061
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
For avoiding confusion between API of `nsRange` and `StaticRange`, I'd like to
rename `nsRange::CreateRange()` to `nsRange::Create()` because
`StaticRange::CreateStaticRange()` is too long name and
`StaticRange::CreateRange()` sounds odd. This patch renames it and changes
related methods to template methods to avoid runtime cost of temporary
`RawRangeBoundary` instance creation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35141
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`Document::ExecCommand()` knows subject principal. This patch makes it tell
`EditorCommand::DoCommand()` and `EditorCommand::DoCommandParam()`. Then,
makes they tell each editor public methods which may cause dispatching
`beforeinput` event once we implement it. Finally, each editor public
method sets it to the constructor of `EditorBase::AutoEditActionDataSetter`.
This means that when editor tries to dispatch `beforeinput` event, editor
can check whether it's called by JS or not from everywhere.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29635
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`nsIDocumentStateListener` is a scriptable interface and each method may run
any script. So, we should mark them as `can_run_script`. Then, we need to
mark a lot of editing methods because we need to mark
`EditorBase::EndTransactionInternal()` and `EditorBase::DoTransactionInternal()`
as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30360
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It'd be better to change copy constructor of `EditorDOMPointBase` to explicit,
but it'd require too many changes in editor code. So, this patch just changes
each method callers only.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30054
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`CanCut()`, `CanCopy()` and `CanPaste()` return error only when the editor has
already been destroyed or not been initialized yet, or when failed to access
clipboard when the document is not HTML/XHTML.
`CanDelete()` returns error only when the editor has already been destroyed or
not been initialized yet.
So, these error result won't be exposed to the web in most cases and such
exception shouldn't stop any content script because Chrome basically does not
throw exception in such situation as far as I know.
Therefore, there should be overloads of them to return `bool` result directly
for making their callers simpler.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28608
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
So, this patch makes all caller of it safe including its arguments unless
they come from other methods.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27225
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If insertion string ends with ASCII whitespace and there is no following
content in the block, `HTMLEditRules::AdjustWhitespaces()` needs to insert
`<br>` element. It's called only by `HTMLEditRules::AfterEditInner()` and
that does only simple things with `WSRunObject`. Therefore, this moves the
code into `AfterEditInner()`.
For making it adjust the whitespaces, `HTMLEditRules::WillInsertText()` needs
to notify `AfterEditInner()` of dirty range with `mDocChangeRange`. Therefore,
this patch makes it set `mDocChangeRange` manually after inserting composition
string.
On the other hand, there is another bug. `WSRunObject` was designed to treat
only inserting text for `WSRunObject::InsertText()`. I.e., not designed to
treat replacing existing composition string with new string. Therefore,
`WSRunObject::InsertText()` adjusts whitespaces only around start of
composition string. Therefore, if composition string ends with an ASCII
whitespace, it's not replaced with NBSP and that causes:
- failing `WSRunObject::AdjustWhitespaces()` inserts `<br>` element at
`AfterEditInner()` of committing composition.
- then, next composition's first `WSRunObject::InsertText()` removes the
last whitespace due to not followed by `<br>` nor any other content.
Therefore, this patch makes `WSRunObject` takes 2 DOM points to be able to
treat replaced range.
In strictly speaking, the latter change require more changes and tests for
supporting replacement with any other methods. However, it's risky and out
of scope of this bug.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26423
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch marks `EditorBase::InsertNodeTransaction()` **and** its callers as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Unfortunately, this patch tells us that some `GetSomething()` methods may destroy the editor since `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesForOperation()`, `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromPoint()` and `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection()` may change the DOM tree. Additionally, initialization methods may destroy the editor since it may insert a bogus `<br>` node.
Note that this patch also removes some unused methods. I.e., they are not result of some cleaning up the code. This patch just avoids marking unused methods as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25027
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch marks `EditorBase::InsertNodeTransaction()` **and** its callers as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Unfortunately, this patch tells us that some `GetSomething()` methods may destroy the editor since `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesForOperation()`, `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromPoint()` and `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection()` may change the DOM tree. Additionally, initialization methods may destroy the editor since it may insert a bogus `<br>` node.
Note that this patch also removes some unused methods. I.e., they are not result of some cleaning up the code. This patch just avoids marking unused methods as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25027
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`EditorBase::SelectEntierDocument()` uses `Selection::Extend()` but it's too
slow. It should use `Selection::SetStartAndEndInLimiter()` instead.
Additionally, `TextEditor::SelectEntierDocument()` shrink the result of
`EditorBase::SelectEntierDocument()` with `Selection::Extend()` if there is
a `moz-<br>` element. So, `TextEditor::SelectEntinerDocument()` should set
its expected selection with a call for saving the runtime cost.
Then, we don't need to make `EditorBase::SelectEntierDocument()` as non-pure
virtual method. So, this patch makes each its callers call
`Selection->SelectAllChildren()` directly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23461
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`EditorBase::SelectEntierDocument()` uses `Selection::Extend()` but it's too
slow. It should use `Selection::SetStartAndEndInLimiter()` instead.
Additionally, `TextEditor::SelectEntierDocument()` shrink the result of
`EditorBase::SelectEntierDocument()` with `Selection::Extend()` if there is
a `moz-<br>` element. So, `TextEditor::SelectEntinerDocument()` should set
its expected selection with a call for saving the runtime cost.
Then, we don't need to make `EditorBase::SelectEntierDocument()` as non-pure
virtual method. So, this patch makes each its callers call
`Selection->SelectAllChildren()` directly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23461
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`PresShell.h` is exposed as `mozilla/PresShell.h` and `PresShell` is the only
concrete class of `nsIPresShell`. Therefore, we have no reason to access
`PresShell` via `nsIPresShell`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23277
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
As far as I've tested, Chrome does not throw exception even when editor is
destroyed or editor content is modified unexpectedly. So, we should return
`NS_OK` from most public methods of editor when internal methods return
`NS_ERROR_EDITOR_DESTROYED` or `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_UNEXPECTED_DOM_TREE`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20811
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We should stop handling splitting nodes if mutation event listeners move or
remove the split nodes unexpectedly because the post processors may not be
able to keep handling the nodes. For example, if a node is moved to outside
of editing host, we shouldn't touch it anymore due to non-editable.
This patch makes `EditorBase::DoSplitNode()` return new error for making
any parent callers stop their job, but note that the following patch makes
any public methods expose the new error as exception for compatibility with
Chrome.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20810
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
DataTransfer should have more 2 constructors. One takes |const nsAString&| and
sets its data to the string. The other takes |nsITransferable*| and stores only
its data with DataTransferItem.
If given data is external resource like the case of `HTMLEditor::PasteTransferable()`,
we should copy its data to each DataTransferItem because nsITransferable is not
cycle-collectable, but DataTransfer may be grabbed by JS. Unfortunately, adding
new path to initialize DataTransfer with nsITransferable instance is too risky
because DataTransfer and DataTransferItem work together to initialize each of
them if DataTransfer is in external mode. Therefore, this patch makes the
new constructor temporarily sets it to in external mode, then, cache usable types
first, then, call `FillAllExternalData()` to make each DataTransferItem initializes
its data by itself, finally, make the constructor set it to internal mode and release
nsITransferable instance. This is ugly implementation but the most reasonable
way for now because:
- We don't need to change DataTransfer nor DataTransferItem a lot in this bug.
- We don't need to duplicate any code like a loop in `CacheExternalData()`.
In another bug, we should redesign DataTransfer and DataTransferItem to
make DataTransferable easier to be added new constructors.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19298
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
InputEvent.dataTransfer should be set to non-null when InputEvent.inputType
is "insertFromPaste", "insertFromDrop" or "insertReplacementText" and
editor is an HTMLEditor instance:
https://rawgit.com/w3c/input-events/v1/index.html#dfn-datahttps://w3c.github.io/input-events/#dfn-data
("insertTranspose" and "insertFromYank" are not currently supported on Gecko.)
This patch makes nsContentUtils::DispatchInputEvent() take dataTransfer value
and EditorBase set it via AutoEditActionDataSetter like data value.
However, we need to create other constructors of DataTransfer to create its
read-only instances initialized with nsITransferable or nsAString. This will
be implemented by the following patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19297
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Although neither Chrome nor Safari does not set InputEvent.data when the event
is caused by `document.execCommand()` with `backColor`, `foreColor` nor
`hiliteColor`, Safari supports styling color with touchbar and in that case,
Safari sets it (*1).
Additionally, currently Safari uses `rgb()` to represents a color value and
using same rule to serializing color value for CSS OM matches Safari's behavior
and can represent any valid color values.
This patch makes given color value parsed and then serialized with same code
in style system. If the value is `currentcolor`, `inherit`, `initial` or `reset`, sets
the value as-is for now. Additionally, when given value is invalid, sets the value
as-is for forward compatibility.
Note that automated tests will be added into input-events-exec-command.html
by the last patch.
1. https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/94#issuecomment-461061517
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19295
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When InputEvent.inputType is "formatSetBlockTextDirection" or
"formatSetInlineTextDirection", InputEvent.data value should be one of
"ltr", "rtl", "auto" or "null".
https://rawgit.com/w3c/input-events/v1/index.html#dfn-datahttps://w3c.github.io/input-events/#dfn-data
We only supports "ltr" and "rtl" when user switches the direction with
Accel + Shift + X. Therefore this patch makes EditorBase set the data
to "ltr" or "rtl".
Oddly, with synthesizing the shortcut keys, the command is not executed
properly in the automated test. Therefore, this patch dispatches the
command directly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19288
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
GitLab's comment calls scrollTop on input event handler. The scollTop may cause
reflow. When causing reflow, editor is destroyed and initialized again. Then
nsTextEditorState will set current value to editor. But this is failure.
By bug 1465702, selection is cached in edit action. When initializing editor,
selection controller is updated, so selection into cache becomes invalid. It
means that all selection methods will return error since document is different.
So we should update selection cache when initializing editor.
Also, I cannot create test case for this situation since we have to cause reflow
in input and/or composition event. Do you have any idea?
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D16944
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch implements InputType.inputType which is declared by Input Events.
The attribute has already been implemented by Chrome and Safari. Chrome
implements Input Events Level 1, but Safari implements Input Events Level 2.
Difference between them is only whether it supports "insertFromComposition",
"deleteByComposition" and "deleteCompositionText". This patch makes the
level switchable with pref and takes Level 1 by default because Level 2 is
still unstable around event order with composition events.
For reducing string copy cost at dispatching "input" event, this patch
makes EditorInternalInputEvent store valid input-type as enum class,
EditorInputType and resolves it to string value when
dom::InputEvent::GetInputType() is called. Note that the reason why
this patch names the enum class as EditorInputType is, there is InputType
enum class already for avoiding conflict the name, this appends "Editor"
prefix because "input" and "beforeinput" events are fired only when an
editor has focus.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
There's a few subtle behavior changes here, which I'll try to break down in the
commit message.
The biggest one is the EditableDescendantCount stuff going away. This
was added in bug 1181130, to prevent clicking on the non-editable div from
selecting the editable div inside. This is problematic for multiple reasons:
* First, I don't think non-editable regions of an editable element should
be user-select: all.
* Second, it just doesn't work in Shadow DOM (the editable descendant count is
not kept up-to-date when not in the uncomposed doc), so nested
contenteditables behave differently inside vs. outside a Shadow Tree.
* Third, I think it's user hostile to just entirely disable selection if you
have a contenteditable descendant as a child of a user-select: all thing.
WebKit behaves like this patch in the following test-case (though not Blink):
https://crisal.io/tmp/user-select-all-contenteditable-descendant.html
Edge doesn't seem to support user-select: all at all (no pun intended).
But we don't allow to select anything at all which looks wrong.
* Fourth, it's not tested at all (which explains how we broke it in Shadow DOM
and not even notice...).
In any case I've verified that this doesn't regress the editor from that bug. If
this regresses anything we can fix it as outlined in the first bullet point
above, which should also make us more compatible with other UAs in that
test-case.
The other change is `all` not overriding everything else. So, something like:
<div style="-webkit-user-select: all">All <div style="-webkit-user-select: none">None</div></div>
Totally ignores the -webkit-user-select: none declaration in Firefox before this
change. This doesn't match any other UA nor the spec, and this patch aligns us
with WebKit / Blink.
This in turn makes us not need -moz-text anymore, whose only purpose was to
avoid this.
This also fixes a variety of bugs uncovered by the previous changes, like the
SetIgnoreUserModify(false) call in editor being completely useless, since
presShell->SetCaretEnabled ended in nsCaret::SetVisible, which overrode it.
This in turn uncovered even more bugs, from bugs in the caret painting code,
like not checking -moz-user-modify on the right frame if you're the last frame
of a line, to even funnier bits where before this patch you show the caret but
can't write at all...
In any case, the new setup I came up with is that when you're editing (the
selection is focused on an editable node) moving the caret forces it to end up
in an editable node, thus jumping over non-editable ones.
This has the nice effect of not completely disabling selection of
-moz-user-select: all elements that have editable descendants (which was a very
ad-hoc hack for bug 1181130, and somewhat broken per the above), and also
not needing the -moz-user-select: all for non-editable bits in contenteditable.css
at all.
This also fixes issues with br-skipping like not being able to insert content in
the following test-case:
<div contenteditable="true"><span contenteditable="false">xyz </span><br>editable</div>
If you start moving to the left from the second line, for example.
I think this yields way better behavior in all the relevant test-cases from bug
1181130 / bug 1109968 / bug 1132768, shouldn't cause any regression, and the
complexity is significantly reduced in some places.
There's still some other broken bits that this patch doesn't fix, but I'll file
follow-ups for those.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12687
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Similar to EditorBase::mSavedSel, we can move EditorBase::mRangeUpdater too
because of it's referred only when there is AutoEditActionDataSetter instance
so that it also does not need to be in the cycle collection.
And now, it can be marked as MOZ_STACK_CLASS and remove cycle collection
support.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12402
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
EditorBase::mSavedSel is used only by EditorBase methods which are called only
by AutoSelectionRestorer. Additionally, AutoSelectionRestorer requires
AutoEditActionDataSetter instance. So, we don't need to keep create for
editor instance anymore. And also we don't need to keep it in the cycle
collection.
Note that SelectionState class is also used by PlaceholderTransaction.
Therefore, we cannot make it MOZ_STACK_CLASS.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12401
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
EditorBase::mDirection is set and clear only when
EditorBase::AutoEditActionDataSetter::SetTopLevelEditSubAction(). So, the
direction is related to the top level edit sub action, and we can move it
into AutoEditActionDataSetter.
Note that except EditSubAction::eDeleteSelectedContent, the relation between
sub-action and direction is fixed so that this patch checks the relation with
MOZ_ASSERT. If we could replace EditSubAction::eDeleteSelectedContent with
information of direction, we'd remove the new member of
AutoEditActionDataSetter, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12400
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
EditorBase::mTopLevelEditSubAction is set only by
EditorBase::OnStartToHandleTopLevelEditSubAction() and
EditorBase::OnEndToHandleTopLevelEditSubAction() and they are called only by
AutoTopLevelEditSubActionNotifier().
So, this is used only in stack when a public method of editor is called.
Therefore, we can move it into EditorBase::AutoEditActionDataSetter. Then,
we can reduce heap allocation for editor instances.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12399
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
There's a few subtle behavior changes here, which I'll try to break down in the
commit message.
The biggest one is the EditableDescendantCount stuff going away. This
was added in bug 1181130, to prevent clicking on the non-editable div from
selecting the editable div inside. This is problematic for multiple reasons:
* First, I don't think non-editable regions of an editable element should
be user-select: all.
* Second, it just doesn't work in Shadow DOM (the editable descendant count is
not kept up-to-date when not in the uncomposed doc), so nested
contenteditables behave differently inside vs. outside a Shadow Tree.
* Third, I think it's user hostile to just entirely disable selection if you
have a contenteditable descendant as a child of a user-select: all thing.
WebKit behaves like this patch in the following test-case (though not Blink):
https://crisal.io/tmp/user-select-all-contenteditable-descendant.html
Edge doesn't seem to support user-select: all at all (no pun intended).
But we don't allow to select anything at all which looks wrong.
* Fourth, it's not tested at all (which explains how we broke it in Shadow DOM
and not even notice...).
In any case I've verified that this doesn't regress the editor from that bug. If
this regresses anything we can fix it as outlined in the first bullet point
above, which should also make us more compatible with other UAs in that
test-case.
The other change is `all` not overriding everything else. So, something like:
<div style="-webkit-user-select: all">All <div style="-webkit-user-select: none">None</div></div>
Totally ignores the -webkit-user-select: none declaration in Firefox before this
change. This doesn't match any other UA nor the spec, and this patch aligns us
with WebKit / Blink.
This in turn makes us not need -moz-text anymore, whose only purpose was to
avoid this.
This also fixes a variety of bugs uncovered by the previous changes, like the
SetIgnoreUserModify(false) call in editor being completely useless, since
presShell->SetCaretEnabled ended in nsCaret::SetVisible, which overrode it.
This in turn uncovered even more bugs, from bugs in the caret painting code,
like not checking -moz-user-modify on the right frame if you're the last frame
of a line, to even funnier bits where before this patch you show the caret but
can't write at all...
In any case, the new setup I came up with is that when you're editing (the
selection is focused on an editable node) moving the caret forces it to end up
in an editable node, thus jumping over non-editable ones.
This has the nice effect of not completely disabling selection of
-moz-user-select: all elements that have editable descendants (which was a very
ad-hoc hack for bug 1181130, and somewhat broken per the above), and also
not needing the -moz-user-select: all for non-editable bits in contenteditable.css
at all.
This also fixes issues with br-skipping like not being able to insert content in
the following test-case:
<div contenteditable="true"><span contenteditable="false">xyz </span><br>editable</div>
If you start moving to the left from the second line, for example.
I think this yields way better behavior in all the relevant test-cases from bug
1181130 / bug 1109968 / bug 1132768, shouldn't cause any regression, and the
complexity is significantly reduced in some places.
There's still some other broken bits that this patch doesn't fix, but I'll file
follow-ups for those.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12687
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Currently, a lot of code dispatch "input" event and some of them dispatch
"input" event with wrong interface and/or values. Therefore this patch
creates nsContentUtils::DispatchInputEvent() to make all of them dispatch
correct event.
Unfortunately, due to bug 1506439, we cannot set pointer to refcountable
classes of MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT method to nullptr. Therefore, this patch
creates temporary RefPtr<TextEditor> a lot even though it makes damage to
the performance if it's in a hot path.
This patch makes eEditorInput event dispatched with
InternalEditorInputEvent when "input" event should be dispatched with
dom::InputEvent. However, this patch uses WidgetEvent whose message is
eUnidentifiedEvent and setting WidgetEvent::mSpecifiedEventType to
nsGkAtoms::oninput when "input" event should be dispatched with
dom::Event because we need to keep that eEditorInput and
InternalEditorInputEvent are mapped each other.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12244
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
DocumentResizeEventListener listens to only "resize" events of the window
and when it fired, it just calls HTMLEditor::RefreshResizers(). Fortunately,
neither EditorEventListener nor HTMLEditorEventListener listens to "resize"
events. Therefore, we can move this implementation into
HTMLEditorEventListener.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10866
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Masayuki Nakano
Mirko Brodesser
Ehsan Akhgari
Oana Pop Rus
Noemi Erli
Boris Zbarsky
Makoto Kato
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Sylvestre Ledru
Brindusan Cristian