Users have much better, easier alternatives, like
DOMWindowUtils.{loadSheetUsingURIString,removeSheet}, which we use to
replace the only caller that exists in mozilla-central (the editor
element, which loads EditorOverride.css).
This allows to clean up the style system and editor. There are other
callers in comm-central, but it seems they can switch to DOMWindowUtils
trivially, as the DOMWindowUtils APIs also use the system principal and
thus they can load any URL.
I'll make sure to give them some time with the migration and/or help
out of course.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D71263
* `nsIHTMLEditor.removeAllInlineProperties`
* `nsIHTMLEditor.increaseFontSize`
* `nsIHTMLEditor.decreaseFontSize`
* `nsIHTMLEditor.setParagraphFormat`
* `nsIHTMLEditor.getBackgroundColorState`
* `nsIHTMLEditor.indent`
* `nsIHTMLEditor.align`
* `nsIEditorStyleSheets.replaceOverrideStyleSheet`
* `nsITableEditor.selectBlockOfCells`
These methods are not used by any Gecko products including comm-central and
BlueGriffon so that we should remove them. Note that only
`HTMLEditor::GetBackgroundColorState()` is used internally so that we need to
keep it as a public method of `HTMLEditor`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D61139
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
* getAttributeValue
* cloneAttribute
* splitNode
* joinNodes
* markNodeDirty
* removeEditorObserver
are not used from script. Therefore, we can get rid of them from `nsIEditor`.
However, `EditorBase::GetAttributeValue()` is referred by
`HTMLEditor::CopyCellBackgroundColor()` and it's just a wrapper of
`Element::GetAttr()`. Therefore, this patch makes
`HTMLEditor::CopyCellBackgroundColor()` use `Element::GetAttr()` directly.
And also `EditorBase::MarkNodeDirty()` is used from some friend classes.
Therefore, this patch redesigns it as `MarkElementDirty()` and make all of
them check whether the method call destroys the editor.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D60796
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`HTMLEditRules::WillMakeDefinitionList()` just calls
`HTMLEditRules::WillMakeList()` and `HTMLEditRules::WillMakeList()` can be
called as `HTMLEditRules::MakeOrChangeListAndListItemAsSubAction()` so that
we should merge them and make `HTMLEditor` call it directly.
This patch also removes default action part of
`HTMLEditor::MakeOrChangeListAsAction()` because it runs only when
`HTMLEditRules::WillDoAction()` does not return canceled nor error but not
handled, however, it's won't occur since `HTMLEditRules::WillMakeList()`
always sets `aHandled` to `true` when it returns `NS_OK`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44195
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch fixes an existing bug with this clean up.
Except `HTMLEditRules::MoveBlock()`, `GetListActionNodes()` is called after
calling `SplitInlinesAndCollectEditTargetNodesInExtendedSelectionRanges()`
or `CollectEditTargetNodesInExtendedSelectionRanges()` **with**
`EditSubAction::eCreateOrChangeList`. I think that `HTMLEditRules::MoveBlock()`
using the edit sub-action is a simple mistake. Perhaps, it should be
`EditSubAction::eCreateOrRemvoeBlock`. However, I'm not 100% sure because
`HTMLEditor::CollectEditTargetNodes()` does special handling for
`EditSubAction::eCreateOrRemvoeBlock` but not so for
`EditSubAction::eCreateOrChangeList`. The behavior of difference between
those edit sub-actions are only here. Therefore, this patch creates new
`EditSubAction` `eMergeBlockContents` for `MoveBlock()`.
Then, this patch makes `HTMLEditor::CollectEditTargetNodes()` handle
`EditSubAction::eCreateOrChangeList` insead of `GetListActionNodes()`.
This causes one logic change in `SplitInlinesAndCollectEditTargetNodes()`.
It calls `MaybeSplitElementsAtEveryBRElement()` after `CollectEditTargetNodes()`
so that this change makes calling `MaybeSplitElementsAtEveryBRElement()` at
last. According to my tests, new behavior must be expected since `<br>`
elements outside and in `<table>` should be handled consistently. Therefore,
this patch adds some simple testcases into WPT.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D43190
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`TextEditRules::WillInsert()` is not used with initial purpose since
`HTMLEditor` always works with `HTMLEditRules` and its `WillDoAction()`
always handles `EditSubAction::eInsertElement`.
Additionally, its name is too generic since it does non-related 3 things.
One is checking whether the editor is readonly or disabled. However, this
may not be necessary since its callers may have already checked it or
just ignored the result. So, this should be check by each caller.
Next one is masking password if auto-masking is enabled. This is `TextEditor`
specific feature so that this patch moves the code into
`TextEditor::MaybeDoAutoPasswordMasking()`.
Final one is removing empty `<br>` element for empty editor if there is.
This is common feature so that this patch moves this code into
`EditorBase::EnsureNoPaddingBRElementForEmptyEditor()`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41156
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Editor creates a `<br>` element when it's root element is empty.
Then, it's stored by `TextEditRules::mBogusNode` and used for checking
whether the editor is empty quickly. However, this `<br>` element has
`mozeditorbogusnode` attribute whose value is `true`. However, adding or
removing the attribute is not cheap and web apps can refer such illegal
attribute.
Therefore, this patch makes `HTMLBRElement` take a specific flag whether
it's a bogus node or not. However, this means that this hacky thing will be
exposed outside editor module. For making what is the bogus node clearer,
this patch calls the such `<br>` elements as "padding `<br>` element for
empty editor". So, this patch also includes a lot of renaming methods and
variables, and modifying related comments.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39857
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This requires replacing inclusions of it with inclusions of more specific prefs
files.
The exception is that StaticPrefsAll.h, which is equivalent to StaticPrefs.h,
and is used in `Codegen.py` because doing something smarter is tricky and
suitable for a follow-up. As a result, any change to StaticPrefList.yaml will
still trigger recompilation of all the generated DOM bindings files, but that's
still a big improvement over trigger recompilation of every file that uses
static prefs.
Most of the changes in this commit are very boring. The only changes that are
not boring are modules/libpref/*, Codegen.py, and ServoBindings.toml.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39138
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Only Firefox has an operation to paste clipboard data as quoted text
(Control + middle button paste). Input Events Level 1 and Level 2 declared
new inputType value for this operation. Therefore, we should support it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22067
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch implements InputType.inputType which is declared by Input Events.
The attribute has already been implemented by Chrome and Safari. Chrome
implements Input Events Level 1, but Safari implements Input Events Level 2.
Difference between them is only whether it supports "insertFromComposition",
"deleteByComposition" and "deleteCompositionText". This patch makes the
level switchable with pref and takes Level 1 by default because Level 2 is
still unstable around event order with composition events.
For reducing string copy cost at dispatching "input" event, this patch
makes EditorInternalInputEvent store valid input-type as enum class,
EditorInputType and resolves it to string value when
dom::InputEvent::GetInputType() is called. Note that the reason why
this patch names the enum class as EditorInputType is, there is InputType
enum class already for avoiding conflict the name, this appends "Editor"
prefix because "input" and "beforeinput" events are fired only when an
editor has focus.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Even when execCommand("insertorderedlist") and
execCommand("insertunorderedlist") remove existing lists, we need to set
InputEvent.inputType value to "insertOrderedList" or "insertUnorderedList".
Fortunately, the XPCOM method is used only for handling
execCommand("insertorderedlist") and execCommand("insertunorderedlist") on
Firefox. Therefore, we should make it set EditAction to
EditAction::eRemoveOrderedListElement or EditAction::RemoveUnorderedListElement.
Note that comm-central uses this method directly and uses "cmd_removeList"
which causes calling the XPCOM method with empty string. However, input
events for them won't be exposed to the web. Therefore, it's okay to set
EditAction::eRemoveListElement for the other cases.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11439
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch creates new path to insert a line break in TextEditor.
Declares new EditSubAction::eInsertLineBreak and makes the path use
EditAction::eInsertLineBreak instead of EditAction::eInsertParagraphSeparator.
Unfortunately, this patch makes TextEditor::InsertLineBreakAsAction() as
a virtual method for keeping this change as small as possible.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10524
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch creates new path to insert a line break in TextEditor.
Declares new EditSubAction::eInsertLineBreak and makes the path use
EditAction::eInsertLineBreak instead of EditAction::eInsertParagraphSeparator.
Unfortunately, this patch makes TextEditor::InsertLineBreakAsAction() as
a virtual method for keeping this change as small as possible.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10524
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Input Events Level 2 declares "deleteByComposition" for empty composition
removes selected content and "deleteCompositionText" for canceling composition.
https://w3c.github.io/input-events/#interface-InputEvent-Attributes
Therefore, TextEditor::OnCompositionChange() should use a new EditAction for
the former only when new composition string is empty, there is no composition
string and there is non-collapsed Selection.
And also TextEditor::OnCompositionEnd() should use another new EditAction for
the latter when composition is canceled with empty string (we don't restore
selected content which is removed by the composition).
Additionally, due to bug 1305387, we don't dispatch "input" event when
we handle TextEditor::OnCompositionChange(). Instead, we dispatch it
when we handle TextEditor::OnCompositionEnd(). Therefore, we need to
use EditAction::eCommitComposition in TextEditor::OnCompositionEnd().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10520
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch makes public methods of EditorBase create AutoEditActionDataSetter
as far as possible. However, does not do so for some public methods if they are
not necessary to create it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10006
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Like TextEditRules, EditorBase should have a stack class which cache necessary
objects and current handling edit action. The edit action will be necessary
when we implement InputEvent.inputType.
Different from TextEditRules, this adds |const RefPtr<Selection>&| instead
of |Selection&|. The reason is, when I add MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT to some methods,
it's not allowed like this:
> foo->CanRunScriptMethod(SelectionRef());
I'll update TextEditRules for consistency in the following patches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10005
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
EditSubAction::ignore is declared for making HTMLEditRules::AfterEditInner()
ignores post-processing of handling edit action. Currently, this is used only
by TextEditRules::CreateBogusNodeIfNeeded() and
HTMLEditor::ReplaceHeadContentsWithHTML(). So, we should make them use
specific EditSubAction values which explain what they do and make
HTMLEditRules::AfterEditInner() ignore both of them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JSHcgPfTrOE
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c054c2db257dda7e1e3ace01f8e8831e07268f7e
According to this usage, perhaps, we can remove this from EditSubAction and
this should be moved to new EditAction.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HzfcC051rNB
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e42cade8436b082b4dc2adfcbbac75e17779cfd7
And the odd number assign does not make sense anymore. So, removes it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JSyMNcrNhpP
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : efdb31d94d0fcae50cd72b5ee0d27041a454887a
Although, there might be no reason to have those edit sub-actions separately.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BaaNCqfk4V4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 061bc85c85489b6b2617e05bd91254667ddedb1a
When we implement InputEvent.inputType, we need to set a stack class to record
which edit action is currently handled. However, currently, we call smaller
jobs as edit action. For example, when user types a character at selecting
some characters, then, EditAction::deleteSelection is performed first, then,
EditAction::insertText is performed. However, for the InputEvent.inputType,
we need inserText information. So, for making new enum EditAction, we need
to rename current EditAction to EditSubAction.
And also this renames related stuff:
EditorBase::mIsInEditAction -> EditorBase::mIsInEditSubAction
EditorBase::IsInEditAction() -> EditorBase::IsInEditSubAction()
EditorBase::mAction -> EditorBase::mTopLevelEditSubAction
TextEditRules::mTheAction -> TextEditRules::mTopLevelEditSubAction
EditorBase::StartOperation() ->
EditorBase::OnStartToHandleTopLevelEditSubAction()
EditorBase::EndOperation() ->
EditorBase::OnEndHandlingTopLevelEditSubAction()
AutoRules -> AutoTopLevelEditSubActionNotifier
RulesInfo -> EditSubActionInfo
MozReview-Commit-ID: cvSkPUjFm1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : baf527a3e353b7a8ebe9a46be2243b059c500234
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Masayuki Nakano
Razvan Maries
Nicholas Nethercote
Sylvestre Ledru
Cosmin Sabou