I did not add a separate macro for `MOZ_TRIVIAL_DTOR` as I could not really
think of a use case for it. Let me know if you prefer that I add it as a
distinct macro.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39719
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I did not add a separate macro for `MOZ_TRIVIAL_DTOR` as I could not really
think of a use case for it. Let me know if you prefer that I add it as a
distinct macro.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39719
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I did not add a separate macro for `MOZ_TRIVIAL_DTOR` as I could not really
think of a use case for it. Let me know if you prefer that I add it as a
distinct macro.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39719
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is a best effort attempt at ensuring that the adverse impact of
reformatting the entire tree over the comments would be minimal. I've used a
combination of strategies including disabling of formatting, some manual
formatting and some changes to formatting to work around some clang-format
limitations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13193
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
As per bug 1487622, annotations have side effects on codegen, one of
which changes a leak signature that the wpt harness doesn't match
against its whitelist anymore.
Interestingly, while looking at the issue, I found multiple moz_*
annotations that weren't actually looked for by the clang plugin,
making them useless. Even more interestingly, removing them changes
codegen in such a way that the leak signature mentioned above is not
altered anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5000
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
--HG--
rename : xpcom/ds/nsIAtom.h => xpcom/ds/nsAtom.h
extra : rebase_source : ac3e904a21b8b48e74534fff964f1623ee937c67
/home/worker/workspace/build/src/mozglue/build/WindowsDllBlocklist.cpp:816:1: error: 'noreturn' function does return [-Werror]
MozReview-Commit-ID: SYgPDW0sMV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 27b1dda404b3fc5fab95dd524677387bad921751
The generic fallback MOZ_FALLTHROUGH definition is insufficient for GCC 7 and
above, resulting in --enable-warnings-as-errors builds failing.
The check for clang support is changed to use the __has_cpp_attribute macro,
which is more robust than checking the __cplusplus version.
Also, MOZ_FALLTHROUGH is now only defined in C++ code, since GCC errors out if
it encounters a scoped attribute being used with __has_cpp_attribute in C code.
No C code uses MOZ_FALLTHROUGH or derivatives at the moment.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4nKFBRD5jSF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0c37ae39c806ca24a3271d3ec19531dd16e05daf
The -fsanitize=integer analysis from UBSan can be helpful to detect signed and unsigned integer overflows in the codebase. Unfortunately, those occur very frequently, making it impossible to test anything with it without the use of a huge blacklist. This patch includes a blacklist that is broad enough to silence everything that would drain performance too much. But even with this blacklist, neither tests nor fuzzing is "clean". We can however in the future combine this with static analysis to limit ourselves to interesting places to look at, or improve the dynamic analysis to omit typical benign overflows.
It also adds another attribute that can be used on functions. It is not used right now because it was initially easier to add things to the compile-time blacklist to get started.
Finally, it includes a runtime suppression list and patches various parts in the test harnesses to support that. It is currently empty and it should not be used on frequent overflows because it is expensive. However, it has the advantage that it can be used to differentiate between signed and unsigned overflows while the compile-time blacklist cannot do that. So it can be used to e.g. silence unsigned integer overflows on a file or function while still reporting signed issues. We can also use this suppression list for any other UBSan related suppressions, should we ever want to use other features from that sanitizer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: C5ofhfJdpCS
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 952043a441b41b2f58ec4abc51ac15fa71fc142f
The -fsanitize=integer analysis from UBSan can be helpful to detect signed and unsigned integer overflows in the codebase. Unfortunately, those occur very frequently, making it impossible to test anything with it without the use of a huge blacklist. This patch includes a blacklist that is broad enough to silence everything that would drain performance too much. But even with this blacklist, neither tests nor fuzzing is "clean". We can however in the future combine this with static analysis to limit ourselves to interesting places to look at, or improve the dynamic analysis to omit typical benign overflows.
It also adds another attribute that can be used on functions. It is not used right now because it was initially easier to add things to the compile-time blacklist to get started.
Finally, it includes a runtime suppression list and patches various parts in the test harnesses to support that. It is currently empty and it should not be used on frequent overflows because it is expensive. However, it has the advantage that it can be used to differentiate between signed and unsigned overflows while the compile-time blacklist cannot do that. So it can be used to e.g. silence unsigned integer overflows on a file or function while still reporting signed issues. We can also use this suppression list for any other UBSan related suppressions, should we ever want to use other features from that sanitizer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: C5ofhfJdpCS
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 64aa804965d24bb90b103c00c692a2ac6859e408
This annotates vsprintf-like functions with MOZ_FORMAT_PRINTF. This may
provide some minimal checking of such calls (the GCC docs say that it
checks for the string for "consistency"); but in any case shouldn't
hurt.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HgnAK1LiorE
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9c8d715d6560f89078c26ba3934e52a2b5778b6a