Most users of JSONWriter want to fill a string, so instead of having all these
similar implementations, we now have central reusable implementations:
- JSONStringWriteFunc contains a string and writes to it.
- JSONStringRefWriteFunc references a string and writes to it. This is most
useful when the string already exists somewhere, or needs to be returned from
a function (so we avoid another conversion when returning).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154618
Most users of JSONWriter want to fill a string, so instead of having all these
similar implementations, we now have central reusable implementations:
- JSONStringWriteFunc contains a string and writes to it.
- JSONStringRefWriteFunc references a string and writes to it. This is most
useful when the string already exists somewhere, or needs to be returned from
a function (so we avoid another conversion when returning).
Depends on D154617
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D154618
These constructors are unnecessary and can be defined with a `using` statement,
making it easier to change all constructors simultaneously.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D153620
This improves consistency with the child process case, and will make it easier
to attach additional state without needing to thread it through every child
process callsite manually.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D153619
This type is also used in other places to start non-initial actors, and will
allow us to attach additional state more easily without needing to thread it
through every child process callsite manually.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D153618
Add support for the oculus-touch-v3 (Quest2) input profile. As specified
in the XR input profile we're setting oculus-touch-v2, oculus-touch, and
generic-trigger-squeeze-thumbstick as fallback profiles.
Update the externalVR VRControllerType enum as well.
Co-authored-by: Imanol Fernandez <ifernandez@igalia.com>
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D147519
In the following patch we are going to change the signature of
ShouldSanitizePreference to take a Pref object. Pref is only
known to the Preferences compilation unit; so to keep this member
(whose signature will change) we would need to expose the Pref
class. However it will only be a forward declaration, one could
not construct a Pref object in e.g. the gtest.
It is simpler to just remove the member entirely and call
ShouldSanitizePreference unconditionally - the member was only
used for the gtest, and while the gtest will be less robust
because of this change, it will still do some testing.
Depends on D141419
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141420
To do the correct thing in Preferences::SerializePreferences
(which is used during subprocess startup) we need to know if
the destination process is a web content process or not.
We add parameters to
SharedPreferenceSerializer::SerializeToSharedMemory that let
us figure that out.
In Preferences::SerializePreferences we fix the call to
aShouldSanitizeFn to pass the correct destination.
Depends on D141415
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141416
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
dom/media/ipc/RDDProcessManager.cpp(320,21): error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'base::ProcessId' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
gpuProcessPid != -1 ? gpuProcessPid : base::GetCurrentProcId();
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~
dom/media/ipc/RDDProcessManager.cpp(332,21): error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'base::ProcessId' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
if (gpuProcessPid != -1) {
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~
gfx/layers/ipc/SharedSurfacesParent.cpp(360,38): error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'base::ProcessId' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
if (!gpm || gpm->GPUProcessPid() != -1) {
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~
ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp(2145,13): error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int32_t' (aka 'int') and 'const base::ProcessId' (aka 'const unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
if (pid != base::kInvalidProcessId &&
~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D144688
In the following patch we are going to change the signature of
ShouldSanitizePreference to take a Pref object. Pref is only
known to the Preferences compilation unit; so to keep this member
(whose signature will change) we would need to expose the Pref
class. However it will only be a forward declaration, one could
not construct a Pref object in e.g. the gtest.
It is simpler to just remove the member entirely and call
ShouldSanitizePreference unconditionally - the member was only
used for the gtest, and while the gtest will be less robust
because of this change, it will still do some testing.
Depends on D141419
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141420
To do the correct thing in Preferences::SerializePreferences
(which is used during subprocess startup) we need to know if
the destination process is a web content process or not.
We add parameters to
SharedPreferenceSerializer::SerializeToSharedMemory that let
us figure that out.
In Preferences::SerializePreferences we fix the call to
aShouldSanitizeFn to pass the correct destination.
Depends on D141415
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141416
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
In the following patch we are going to change the signature of
ShouldSanitizePreference to take a Pref object. Pref is only
known to the Preferences compilation unit; so to keep this member
(whose signature will change) we would need to expose the Pref
class. However it will only be a forward declaration, one could
not construct a Pref object in e.g. the gtest.
It is simpler to just remove the member entirely and call
ShouldSanitizePreference unconditionally - the member was only
used for the gtest, and while the gtest will be less robust
because of this change, it will still do some testing.
Depends on D141419
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141420
To do the correct thing in Preferences::SerializePreferences
(which is used during subprocess startup) we need to know if
the destination process is a web content process or not.
We add parameters to
SharedPreferenceSerializer::SerializeToSharedMemory that let
us figure that out.
In Preferences::SerializePreferences we fix the call to
aShouldSanitizeFn to pass the correct destination.
Depends on D141415
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141416
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
In the following patch we are going to change the signature of
ShouldSanitizePreference to take a Pref object. Pref is only
known to the Preferences compilation unit; so to keep this member
(whose signature will change) we would need to expose the Pref
class. However it will only be a forward declaration, one could
not construct a Pref object in e.g. the gtest.
It is simpler to just remove the member entirely and call
ShouldSanitizePreference unconditionally - the member was only
used for the gtest, and while the gtest will be less robust
because of this change, it will still do some testing.
Depends on D141419
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141420
To do the correct thing in Preferences::SerializePreferences
(which is used during subprocess startup) we need to know if
the destination process is a web content process or not.
We add parameters to
SharedPreferenceSerializer::SerializeToSharedMemory that let
us figure that out.
In Preferences::SerializePreferences we fix the call to
aShouldSanitizeFn to pass the correct destination.
Depends on D141415
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141416
Now that we send everything (except sometimes the user value
is sanitized) we should no longer perform this check.
This is also good because it eliminates security code you
have to have (and thus accidently omitting it is a
vulnerability) and changes it to security code that happens
automatically, and is enforced by the compiler (via mandatory
ctor argument.)
Depends on D141414
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141415
PreferenceUpdate is the IPC message notifying a child process
that a preference has been updated. To correctly decide whether
or not a value should be sanitized in it, we need to know
what type of destination process it is; we add parameters to
Preferences::GetPreference indicating that.
Inside of ToDomPref we call ShouldSanitizePreference to
correctly populate the sanitized bit.
Depends on D141412
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141413
This simplifies the number of negations needed,
and makes things easy to understand. I think
anyway; I know that without renaming it I made
several annoying-to-diagnose negation errors...
Depends on D141411
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141412
A couple places where it might be a web content process
still pass 'false' - this will be corrected in a later
patch.
Depends on D141410
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141411
This check seems to fail even if the VR pref is enabled. I think this is
because we are running this code while very early in process startup.
I think it will not introduce risk because the other process in this case
will be the parent process, so if that's been taken over then we've already
lost.
This also seems to fix the leak that I had to ignore before, probably
because the VR process wasn't even starting up properly before, so I've
removed the leak threshold I had to add.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141170
Gerald Squelart
Iulian Moraru
Nika Layzell
Sergio Villar Senin
Mike Hommey
Tom Ritter
Butkovits Atila
Cristian Tuns
Randell Jesup
Noemi Erli
Andrew McCreight