Generate the C++ and JS code to handle UniFFI bindings. The WebIDL code
is completely static and doesn't need to be generated.
There's support for both synchronus and async functions, but we haven't
decided the how we want this to be configured. In practice, almost all
functions will need to be async, so for now we're just forcing all
functions to be.
The `uniffi-bindgen-gecko-js` crate builds the binary that generates the
bindings. This binary needs to be fed a list of UDL files, the path of
the .cpp file to generate, and the directory to generate .jsm files in
(and also all of those arguments again, but for the test fixtures).
This is quiet a horrible UI, but it's going to be wrapped in a mach
command.
The `uniffi-js` directory contains shared C++ code for
`uniffi-bindgen-gecko-js`. As much as possible we tried to put the
functionality here and have the generated code simply forward function
calls here.
Still Todo:
- CallbackInterfaces
- Custom and external types
- Datetime and TimeInterval
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D144472
Generate the C++ and JS code to handle UniFFI bindings. The WebIDL code
is completely static and doesn't need to be generated.
There's support for both synchronus and async functions, but we haven't
decided the how we want this to be configured. In practice, almost all
functions will need to be async, so for now we're just forcing all
functions to be.
The `uniffi-bindgen-gecko-js` crate builds the binary that generates the
bindings. This binary needs to be fed a list of UDL files, the path of
the .cpp file to generate, and the directory to generate .jsm files in
(and also all of those arguments again, but for the test fixtures).
This is quiet a horrible UI, but it's going to be wrapped in a mach
command.
The `uniffi-js` directory contains shared C++ code for
`uniffi-bindgen-gecko-js`. As much as possible we tried to put the
functionality here and have the generated code simply forward function
calls here.
Still Todo:
- CallbackInterfaces
- Custom and external types
- Datetime and TimeInterval
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D144472
Generate the C++ and JS code to handle UniFFI bindings. The WebIDL code
is completely static and doesn't need to be generated.
There's support for both synchronus and async functions, but we haven't
decided the how we want this to be configured. In practice, almost all
functions will need to be async, so for now we're just forcing all
functions to be.
The `uniffi-bindgen-gecko-js` crate builds the binary that generates the
bindings. This binary needs to be fed a list of UDL files, the path of
the .cpp file to generate, and the directory to generate .jsm files in
(and also all of those arguments again, but for the test fixtures).
This is quiet a horrible UI, but it's going to be wrapped in a mach
command.
The `uniffi-js` directory contains shared C++ code for
`uniffi-bindgen-gecko-js`. As much as possible we tried to put the
functionality here and have the generated code simply forward function
calls here.
Still Todo:
- CallbackInterfaces
- Custom and external types
- Datetime and TimeInterval
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D144472
This patch is introducing the machinery to automatically generate/check some
stubs used by Reps.
We're focusing on stubs that shouldn't be represented by a front as it's easier
to deal with; we should then have follow up and incremental patches for each
stubs.
Some data can't be retrieved after being serialized/deserialized (`-0`, unsafe int, …),
and in such case the associated test was modified to directly pass the object.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D139933
Depends on D123655
With this patch, the MessageHandler can immediately check if a command is implemented by the modules, and therefore reject as early as possible.
This is implemented via a checkCommand method on MessageHandler.
Other required changes:
- ModuleRegistry now owns the logic to import BiDi modules.
- ModuleCache exposes a `getAllModuleClasses` to get all the relevant modules for a moduleName+destination pair.
Error messages have been improved and are verified with a dedicated test
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D123655
These documents and scripts were used to generate the add-ons for the tresize
and tart Talos tests before the great WebExtension conversion.
Nowadays, if people really want to install these tests locally, they can
go to about:debugging, use Load Temprary Add-on, and browse to the manifest
of the add-on folder.
Depends on D122378
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D122379
There are some complications here to handle unpackaged and packaged
builds. In addition, there could be a difference between App prefs
and GRE prefs. Since the underlying backgroundtasks code is built as
part of Gecko (i.e., `toolkit/...` rather than `browser/...`) I have
favoured GRE prefs. I think, however, that what is written will work
for App-specific prefs, but I'm not concerned with that detail at this
time.
This also add tests for backgroundtask-specific prefs, which are
structured as both xpcshell and mochitest-chrome tests because
locally, the former tests unpackaged builds and the latter can
accommodate testing packaged builds. We could use mochitest-chrome
for both, but this has been pleasant to work with locally.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D97510
There are some complications here to handle unpackaged and packaged
builds. In addition, there could be a difference between App prefs
and GRE prefs. Since the underlying backgroundtasks code is built as
part of Gecko (i.e., `toolkit/...` rather than `browser/...`) I have
favoured GRE prefs. I think, however, that what is written will work
for App-specific prefs, but I'm not concerned with that detail at this
time.
This also add tests for backgroundtask-specific prefs, which are
structured as both xpcshell and mochitest-chrome tests because
locally, the former tests unpackaged builds and the latter can
accommodate testing packaged builds. We could use mochitest-chrome
for both, but this has been pleasant to work with locally.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D97510
There are some complications here to handle unpackaged and packaged
builds. In addition, there could be a difference between App prefs
and GRE prefs. Since the underlying backgroundtasks code is built as
part of Gecko (i.e., `toolkit/...` rather than `browser/...`) I have
favoured GRE prefs. I think, however, that what is written will work
for App-specific prefs, but I'm not concerned with that detail at this
time.
This also add tests for backgroundtask-specific prefs, which are
structured as both xpcshell and mochitest-chrome tests because
locally, the former tests unpackaged builds and the latter can
accommodate testing packaged builds. We could use mochitest-chrome
for both, but this has been pleasant to work with locally.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D97510
Ben Dean-Kawamura
Butkovits Atila
Mark Banner
criss
Nicolas Chevobbe
Alexandre Poirot
Scott
Csoregi Natalia
Alexandre Lissy
Alexandru Michis
wartmanm
Julian Descottes
Mike Conley
Markus Stange
Henrik Skupin
Andre Natal
Iulian Moraru
Kajal Sah
Falguni Islam
Ted Campbell
Nick Alexander
Michael Froman
Razvan Maries
Narcis Beleuzu