Notice as TimeStamp is not an integral type, it can't be wrapped by
mozilla::Atomic. However, we wrap it in MainThreadData to assure it only
is accessed from the main thread.
Another issue is that TimeStamp class does allow some operations on a
Null value, with assertions on debug builds.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9GPNDUooQmI
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e2b5fe81a4c5c696425583a04395f2ae79aeaccc
Same approach as the other bug, mostly replacing automatically by removing
'using mozilla::Forward;' and then:
s/mozilla::Forward/std::forward/
s/Forward</std::forward</
The only file that required manual fixup was TestTreeTraversal.cpp, which had
a class called TestNodeForward with template parameters :)
MozReview-Commit-ID: A88qFG5AccP
This was done automatically replacing:
s/mozilla::Move/std::move/
s/ Move(/ std::move(/
s/(Move(/(std::move(/
Removing the 'using mozilla::Move;' lines.
And then with a few manual fixups, see the bug for the split series..
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jxze3adipUh
Some of the less trivial changes:
* When we allocated a symbol, we used the atom realm's RNG to create a hash code [0]. Instead of this I added a RNG for this to the runtime.
* IsCompilingWasm returned true if the JitContext's realm is nullptr, but that's now also true when we initialize the trampolines stored in the atoms zone. To fix that I added a CompileZone* to JitContext, in addition to the CompileRuntime and CompileRealm, and we now check the zone instead of the realm in IsCompilingWasm.
* JSContext::hasEnteredRealm is only called in DEBUG builds so I made hasEnteredRealm and enterRealmDepth_ #ifdef DEBUG.
Based on similar functionality for ICU. Define a GMPReporter class and
use its methods for libgmp allocation.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4b536f8a331146109f1cbecf7246f5d4063ec457
This also changes many references to the 'pseudo stack' to refer to the 'label
stack' instead. The label stack is one of the two stacks that are managed by
the profiling stack, the other stack being the JS interpreter stack.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Ed0YMMeCBY8
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5675d670f424c7d7dda04bafc2b3431fa2485e3c
The term "entry" is already used for elements in the profile buffer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1aB22V6veQh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c664eb4d6bed6cb74ba8a1b67ea99bd8ca57bcf7
extra : source : 3264c0cc0027b240b55bd3aebf27263b1e1d1cc0
The name Cpp was confusing, because C++ functions are in the native stack, not
in the pseudo stack. The pseudo stack only contains frames for manually
instrumented code that uses AutoProfilerLabel, and JS frames.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9ptfhREo0qy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 76a1a32acb4c946aeb2ad45e904e419c1c9e2ad1
For some reason, the CC spends a lot of time tracing jsids on
ObjectGroups when an addon is installed. This patch avoids that by
adding a canSkipJsids flag to JSTracer, and using it in
ObjectGroup::traceChildren. If this is true, then the tracer is free
to not report every jsid. This flag is set to true for the two CC
tracers.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CWFqQEr0SxV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cc31c22717f8990166454db191e0d40c145e09f0
This was used to label IndexedDB work and work in storage/mozStorage*.
I don't think this deserves its own category; categories are most useful for
the main thread, and most of the time-consuming database-related work happens
on helper threads. The main thread pieces are mostly for asynchronicity-
coordination and don't usually take up time.
This patch labels IndexedDB work as DOM instead (which is maybe debatable) and
the rest as OTHER.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3UYhFFbi3Ry
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5c88dfd67274103de01fe44191f49776017738f9
The next changeset is going to move over more annotations that Gecko developers
would count as "layout" into the LAYOUT category, and which is currently marked
as GRAPHICS.
We can add a subcategory for style resolution once we have subcategories, but
for now I think it makes more sense to put style resolution into the same bucket
as reflow and display list building.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7r9eICVBA1Z
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ce2df7a07522e99b0ccb59e40a8eae590ebfe834
Categories are useful to indicate: This much % of time was spent in this category.
The EVENTS category isn't a very good match for this. This category is currently
only set on labels of functions that handle the processing of an event. But
those functions are usually closer to the base of the stack, and the actual CPU
work during the processing of an event is usually in another category closer to
the top of the stack, e.g. in JS if we're running an event handler, or in LAYOUT
if we're hit testing the position of the event.
This changeset removes the EVENTS category and replaces all uses of it with the
OTHER category.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JPm5hQiBkvp
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 66f8ee003d2f70111f4cff16d6e2d906ef4bf10b
They're very similar as far as most users of the profiler are concerned, I'd
say, and I don't believe it's worth giving them two different colors in the
activity graphs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HTqjp56naL3
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cf8d64bc3e76ed9bb07100081aebfc404845b8bc
This was used to label IndexedDB work and work in storage/mozStorage*.
I don't think this deserves its own category; categories are most useful for
the main thread, and most of the time-consuming database-related work happens
on helper threads. The main thread pieces are mostly for asynchronicity-
coordination and don't usually take up time.
This patch labels IndexedDB work as DOM instead (which is maybe debatable) and
the rest as OTHER.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3UYhFFbi3Ry
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f83946138d8311ea5aa91f537a1d8e420e784068
The next changeset is going to move over more annotations that Gecko developers
would count as "layout" into the LAYOUT category, and which is currently marked
as GRAPHICS.
We can add a subcategory for style resolution once we have subcategories, but
for now I think it makes more sense to put style resolution into the same bucket
as reflow and display list building.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7r9eICVBA1Z
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f447dcbb9d81be81a418c7464ef814ce4778073b
Categories are useful to indicate: This much % of time was spent in this category.
The EVENTS category isn't a very good match for this. This category is currently
only set on labels of functions that handle the processing of an event. But
those functions are usually closer to the base of the stack, and the actual CPU
work during the processing of an event is usually in another category closer to
the top of the stack, e.g. in JS if we're running an event handler, or in LAYOUT
if we're hit testing the position of the event.
This changeset removes the EVENTS category and replaces all uses of it with the
OTHER category.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JPm5hQiBkvp
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fb1ff20aeebb7ac494227e62ba2101039578808c
They're very similar as far as most users of the profiler are concerned, I'd
say, and I don't believe it's worth giving them two different colors in the
activity graphs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HTqjp56naL3
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ed1dc54efd143ad64bc21cfc39853ae90477cc9d
This was used to label IndexedDB work and work in storage/mozStorage*.
I don't think this deserves its own category; categories are most useful for
the main thread, and most of the time-consuming database-related work happens
on helper threads. The main thread pieces are mostly for asynchronicity-
coordination and don't usually take up time.
This patch labels IndexedDB work as DOM instead (which is maybe debatable) and
the rest as OTHER.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3UYhFFbi3Ry
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 16abc3c4bd8ed9ac55b5c188bd10ee26b0566330
The next changeset is going to move over more annotations that Gecko developers
would count as "layout" into the LAYOUT category, and which is currently marked
as GRAPHICS.
We can add a subcategory for style resolution once we have subcategories, but
for now I think it makes more sense to put style resolution into the same bucket
as reflow and display list building.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7r9eICVBA1Z
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 53ce9912d3219ce8ce5dc411e03bb5ef5e2c7b64
Categories are useful to indicate: This much % of time was spent in this category.
The EVENTS category isn't a very good match for this. This category is currently
only set on labels of functions that handle the processing of an event. But
those functions are usually closer to the base of the stack, and the actual CPU
work during the processing of an event is usually in another category closer to
the top of the stack, e.g. in JS if we're running an event handler, or in LAYOUT
if we're hit testing the position of the event.
This changeset removes the EVENTS category and replaces all uses of it with the
OTHER category.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JPm5hQiBkvp
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 34fb2ca94151403a6d7ffd5a8b840f00a8bb4afb
They're very similar as far as most users of the profiler are concerned, I'd
say, and I don't believe it's worth giving them two different colors in the
activity graphs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HTqjp56naL3
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f172424042fab18a514201ba4b6c67c03c209cdb
Jeff Walden
Wander Lairson Costa
Jan de Mooij
André Bargull
Ted Campbell
Jon Coppeard
Tom Schuster
Steve Fink
Andreea Pavel
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Philip Chimento
Robin Templeton
Andi-Bogdan Postelnicu
Markus Stange
Csoregi Natalia
Narcis Beleuzu
Greg Tatum
Brindusan Cristian
Andrew McCreight
Luke Wagner
Ciure Andrei
Paul Bone
Noemi Erli