This changeset updates all the test that were wrongly using ok() and wanted to
use is() AND for which the assert is still passing without any modification
required.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8739
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Everything that goes in a PLDHashtable (and its derivatives, like
nsTHashtable) needs to inherit from PLDHashEntryHdr. But through a lack
of enforcement, copy constructors for these derived classes didn't
explicitly invoke the copy constructor for PLDHashEntryHdr (and the
compiler didn't invoke the copy constructor for us). Instead,
PLDHashTable explicitly copied around the bits that the copy constructor
would have.
The current setup has two problems:
1) Derived classes should be using move construction, not copy
construction, since anything that's shuffling hash table keys/entries
around will be using move construction.
2) Derived classes should take responsibility for transferring bits of
superclass state around, and not rely on something else to handle that.
The second point is not a huge problem for PLDHashTable (PLDHashTable
only has to copy PLDHashEntryHdr's bits in a single place), but future
hash table implementations that might move entries around more
aggressively would have to insert compensation code all over the
place. Additionally, if moving entries is implemented via memcpy (which
is quite common), PLDHashTable copying around bits *again* is
inefficient.
Let's fix all these problems in one go, by:
1) Explicitly declaring the set of constructors that PLDHashEntryHdr
implements (and does not implement). In particular, the copy
constructor is deleted, so any derived classes that attempt to make
themselves copyable will be detected at compile time: the compiler
will complain that the superclass type is not copyable.
This change on its own will result in many compiler errors, so...
2) Change any derived classes to implement move constructors instead of
copy constructors. Note that some of these move constructors are,
strictly speaking, unnecessary, since the relevant classes are moved
via memcpy in nsTHashtable and its derivatives.
This is a regression from bug 1450250, which removed a if (!GetCx()) early
return in this function.
That early return was wrong, both because it prevented elements that were in
shadow trees from targeting other elements, but also because that check was not
present in AfterSetAttr, which means that dynamic updates to the attribute would
work.
Pass the SVGAnimationElement itself to resolve references. That's what we do for
attribute mutations, and also it's the same behavior we have, since the ID
lookup IDTracker does only depends on containing shadow root and containing
document, and that's invariant between a kid and it's DOM parent.
Some other code has been updated to take references instead of pointers so the
null-safety of those methods is explicit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4349
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Always assume allowed-for-all-content. There are a couple callers which weren't
doing that:
* A unit test -> removed.
* ComputeAnimationDistance: Used for testing (in transitions_per_property), and
for the animation inspector. The animation inspector shouldn't show
non-enabled properties. The transitions_per_property test already relies on
getComputedStyle stuff which only uses eForAllContent.
* GetCSSImageURLs: I added this API for the context menu page and such. It
doesn't rely on non-enabled-everywhere properties, it was only using
eInChrome because it was a ChromeOnly API, but it doesn't really need this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2514
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4VOi5Su3Bos
Everything that goes in a PLDHashtable (and its derivatives, like
nsTHashtable) needs to inherit from PLDHashEntryHdr. But through a lack
of enforcement, copy constructors for these derived classes didn't
explicitly invoke the copy constructor for PLDHashEntryHdr (and the
compiler didn't invoke the copy constructor for us). Instead,
PLDHashTable explicitly copied around the bits that the copy constructor
would have.
The current setup has two problems:
1) Derived classes should be using move construction, not copy
construction, since anything that's shuffling hash table keys/entries
around will be using move construction.
2) Derived classes should take responsibility for transferring bits of
superclass state around, and not rely on something else to handle
that.
The second point is not a huge problem for PLDHashTable (PLDHashTable
only has to copy PLDHashEntryHdr's bits in a single place), but future
hash table implementations that might move entries around more
aggressively would have to insert compensation code all over the place.
Additionally, if moving entries is implemented via memcpy (which is
quite common), PLDHashTable copying around bits *again* is inefficient.
Let's fix all these problems in one go, by:
1) Explicitly declaring the set of constructors that PLDHashEntryHdr
implements (and does not implement). In particular, the copy
constructor is deleted, so any derived classes that attempt to make
themselves copyable will be detected at compile time: the compiler
will complain that the superclass type is not copyable.
This change on its own will result in many compiler errors, so...
2) Change any derived classes to implement move constructors instead
of copy constructors. Note that some of these move constructors are,
strictly speaking, unnecessary, since the relevant classes are moved
via memcpy in nsTHashtable and its derivatives.
This is probably the last thing we will ship since it needs the most spec work.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LLmDBLCsCBJ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c06752c9201a9ede87e1ac200ab12577bf784ce6
Changing to Stylo for animation of color with currentColor. Stylo uses
a different distance metric for numeric colors to currentColor. The
result is that a different pacing is used in the fill case.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5x8c3IF5owV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fd1656237fd5df03481e410bae29167df2317536
Changing to Stylo for animation of color with currentColor. Stylo uses
a different distance metric for numeric colors to currentColor. The
result is that a different pacing is used in the fill case.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5x8c3IF5owV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 422dfa69644052a4c9cbfb2355a105c8e5c2b50c
This patch is an automatic replacement of s/NS_NOTREACHED/MOZ_ASSERT_UNREACHABLE/. Reindenting long lines and whitespace fixups follow in patch 6b.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5UQVHElSpCr
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4c1b2fc32b269342f07639266b64941e2270e9c4
extra : source : 907543f6eae716f23a6de52b1ffb1c82908d158a
This was done automatically replacing:
s/mozilla::Move/std::move/
s/ Move(/ std::move(/
s/(Move(/(std::move(/
Removing the 'using mozilla::Move;' lines.
And then with a few manual fixups, see the bug for the split series..
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jxze3adipUh
Disable failing SMIL tests for lighting-color with currentcolor until
StyleComplexColor is extended to support addition.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6tbDYPFI9ey
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a8f1e363bd37c40ae2e48ef682a005aafaa27fe5
This patch basically does:
* remove StyleSetHandle and its corresponding files
* revisit #includes of related header files and change correspondingly
* change nsIPresShell::mStyleSet to be UniquePtr<ServoStyleSet>
* change the creating path of ServoStyleSet to pass UniquePtr
* change other mentions of StyleSetHandle to ServoStyleSet*
* remove AsServo() calls on ServoStyleSet
Some unfortunate bits:
* some methods of (Servo)StyleSet only accepts ServoStyleSheet while
many places call into the methods with StyleSheet, so there are many
->AsServo() added to sheets
MozReview-Commit-ID: K4zYnuhOurA
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 459e8efeb171adad089d94272e143e8c244bd279
extra : source : 65ba2f174fcf7dba4e59c00ee8908b1bd0820a48