Currently, `nsIEditActionListener::WillDeleteSelection()` notifies
`FinderHighliter` of deleting selection ranges. But it's referred only
the ranges, not selection object itself and editor shouldn't modify
`Selection` as far as possible for reducing the runtime cost.
Therefore, it should be replaced with this new API. Then,
`EditorBase::WillDeleteSelectionWithTransaction()` can be rewritten as
`EditorBase::WillDeleteRangesWithTransaction()` later.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D85681
It's not used by mozilla-central, comm-central nor BlueGriffon, and it cannot
work with replacing content, mutation event listener's changes. Therefore,
we should remove this for now. If we need to support this **feature** in some
business reasons, we should provide better API than this anyway.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D76080
The attributes for an interface should be on the line right before the
interface.
Interface attributes should be separated by spaces.
Clean up some trailing whitespace in widget/.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28234
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch goes through and changes a bunch of places in our tree which mention
this bug to use the new feature, making the methods more strongly typed.
There are probably more places in tree which could be changed, but I didn't try
to find them.
Most nsIEditActionListener::Will*() are not implemented, except
WillDeleteText() and WillDeleteSelection() which are implemented by
FinderHighlighter. So, we can get rid of the other Will*() from it.
This patch removes a lot of unnecessary virtual calls and copy of strong
pointers to edit action listeners of EditorBase.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EsqI2tZoBG1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cf78eb8d33b12ca65177b0676f6e45d02e7c0688
Although nsIEditActionListener::WillInsertNode() nobody implements actually,
we should remove it in a follow up bug.
nsIEditActionListener::DidInsertNode() is implemented only by HTMLEditRules.
So, if we make it not use nsIEditActionListener, we can remove it too.
However, keep it for now.
On the other hand, they don't need to receive index of the insertion point.
WillInsertNode() needs next sibling of the insert point, but DidInsertNode()
needs nothing because listener can compute it with new inserted node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GiTKkVyZJlN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9ee38c28217d25d1a3f79b0b458c7b2121350a76
nsIEditActionListner::DidSplitNode() takes 4 arguments, the right node,
old offset in the old right node before splitting, the new left node and
nsresult.
Computing offset for this doesn't make sense because it's always same as
the length of the left node. Additionally, nobody currently use nsersult.
So, we can get rid of it now.
Fortunately, nobody including comm-central and BlueGriffon implements
WillSplitNode(). So, we can get rid of it. However, removing interface
method should be done in a follow up bug. So, we can remove offset computation
in EditorBase::SplitNode() completely in the future.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JWj34SjBNJh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f0e1ed0e466dc8217c1a0ab1722790883a7efd1f
nsIEditActionListener::WillCreateElement() and
nsIEditActionListener::DidCreateElement() are implemented only by m-c.
So, we can remove a set of container node and offset in it from their argument.
Instead, WillCreateElement() should take a node which will be next sibling of
the new node.
Note that only implementation of them is, HTMLEditRules::DidCreateElement().
So, we can get rid of them and can call HTMLEditRules::DidCreateElement()
directly from EditorBase::CreateNode(). However, such change should be done
in another bug which checks all nsIEditActionListener method implementations.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4LQEs2WwrVC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ee1bee1413c578b2873a291c712b8ef46221db0f
Masayuki Nakano
Andrew McCreight
Nicholas Nethercote
Boris Zbarsky
Nika Layzell
Birunthan Mohanathas