This is an extension protocol that can be used for platform specific
API (ie. AccessibleWrap methods).
I'm not thrilled with the seperate constructor for the sub-protocol.
This means that the parent won't have the actor upon DocAccessibleParent
construction, and some timing bugs can arise because of the extra round
trip. It would be cool if both actors could be co-created, but that
would require ManagedEndpoint, and for PBrowser to manage them both. I
don't want to expose this to PBrowser.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37955
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is an extension protocol that can be used for platform specific
API (ie. AccessibleWrap methods).
I'm not thrilled with the seperate constructor for the sub-protocol.
This means that the parent won't have the actor upon DocAccessibleParent
construction, and some timing bugs can arise because of the extra round
trip. It would be cool if both actors could be co-created, but that
would require ManagedEndpoint, and for PBrowser to manage them both. I
don't want to expose this to PBrowser.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37955
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is an extension protocol that can be used for platform specific
API (ie. AccessibleWrap methods).
I'm not thrilled with the seperate constructor for the sub-protocol.
This means that the parent won't have the actor upon DocAccessibleParent
construction, and some timing bugs can arise because of the extra round
trip. It would be cool if both actors could be co-created, but that
would require ManagedEndpoint, and for PBrowser to manage them both. I
don't want to expose this to PBrowser.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37955
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This change will bring us on par with what Chrome does. However, if the author makes an error in applying a landmark role to an interactive element, or other element where the landmark role is illegal, as defined in the [WAI-ARIA in HTML specification section 2](https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/#document-conformance-requirements-for-use-of-aria-attributes-in-html), the accessible properties will now be that of the landmark role, no longer that of the native host language element. This might make some elements less accessible due to author error than before, but we currently do not know of examples in the wild that actually expose this problem. This could only be solved by applying the rules from said table also in the user agents, but that is not specified anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41923
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously, if a hidden, aria-owned subtree was shown and aria-activedescendant was simultaneously targeted inside it, aria-activedescendant would fail.
This occurred because when we processed insertions, the presence of aria-owns meant we didn't create the subtree.
This meant that when we processed aria-activedescendant (which occurred before relocations), the active descendant didn't exist yet.
To fix this, we now process generic notifications (including aria-activedescendant) *after* relocations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40579
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We naively remove and then recreate accessibles when their content's
frame is reconstructed. By delaying the removal until we are certain the
content does not have a new layout frame, we can cut down on redundant
recreations.
When reconstructed content is re-inserted we can check it and its
subtree for missing frames and prune those accessibles from the tree.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38380
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It seems a bit more sensible to me that if any filtering needs to happen
from content insertions, it should happen in the doc and not the
notification controller.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40132
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In FocusManager::ProcessFocusEvent, after firing the event, we get the anchor jump from the target Accessible's document.
However, it seems the Accessible can be shut down during the call to nsEventShell::FireEvent, resulting in a crash when we try to get the anchor jump.
Protect against this by checking whether the target is defunct after firing the event.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39450
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This was an oversight in the checkin for bug 1461244. tfoot was duplicated due to a copy and paste error, thead was not mapped at all. It is now properly mapped, and the test adjusted accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39305
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
IDRefsIterator::GetElem was previously an instance method which could only be used if you instantiated IDRefsIterator.
This is overkill for attributes which can only take a single id reference (rather than an id reference list).
Now, there is a static version of IDRefsIterator::GetElem which can be called with an arbitrary source element.
Any accessibility code should henceforth be using this instead of calling GetElementById directly, as this deals with shadow DOM, etc.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38832
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously, BrowserBridgeChild::SendSetEmbedderAccessible was only called when an OuterDocAccessible was constructed.
However, it's also possible that the BrowserBridgeChild is created *after* the OuterDocAccessible.
Therefore, we must also do this when a BrowserBridgeChild is created if the OuterDocAccessible already exists.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34474
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I think this is a good change regardless of other discussion in bug 1552587. If
we decide to move `mColor` to the top-level of the struct that can be done
separately.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32726
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If the DOM focus is removed before something else is focused, the document gets DOM focus, but no blur event is fired (bug 559561).
This means that no a11y focus event is fired, so clients aren't notified.
This is particularly problematic for screen readers when dismissing some ARIA dialogs, as the screen reader doesn't know that focus has returned to the top level document.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31024
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The previous commit removed the dependence on the discriminant value, so we
don't need to keep discriminants different from text-align anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29361
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`nsIPresShell::ScrollAxis` can be used anywhere and it's used by some
utils actually. So, it should be in `mozilla` namespace and perhaps,
`PresShellForwards.h` is a good place to move it rather than creating
new header file.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29110
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Per the discussion in:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/P79pwa9z5m8/iPYPAWPHCAAJ
They should be CamelCase, and that's what most of them already do. This converts
the rest, which are a few.
For the ones that already used `e` or `k` prefixes, I've mostly done:
for file in $(rg Type::e layout | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#Type::e#Type::#g' $file; done
For the ones that used uppercase, I've removed the prefix if it was already in
the type name, and turn them into CamelCase.
Depends on D28680
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28681
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch moves some `enum` in `nsIPresShell` which are in public scope into
`mozilla` namespace and change them as `enum class`es.
Unfortunately, only "where to scroll" enum is just defines constants of
percentages of scroll destination. Therefore, this patch makes only them
as `static const`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28606
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Similarly to nsITabParent, TabChild is exposed to frontend code via nsITabChild. It's not clear what the future of this interface will be, but for now we can just rename it to nsIBrowserChild.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28134
--HG--
rename : dom/interfaces/base/nsITabChild.idl => dom/interfaces/base/nsIBrowserChild.idl
extra : rebase_source : a6c42a661e35b19e46c60f6f6a6f3dab64c0a1bc
extra : histedit_source : 1eb475bd840bf37a3f86294685c9b3c250684e79