1. We will add more shape-like types in the future, so it's better to
use union to reduce the memory usage.
2. Those shape-like types are mutual exclusive, so we could use union to
wrap them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2746
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It used to be this way because of lifetime issues (plus the shadow
datas were in RwLocks at some point IIRC). Now we guarantee that as long as the
element is away the cascade data is as well, so we don't need to thread it
around.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2768
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We only have this so that ::-moz-placeholder keeps serializing as
::-moz-placeholder, but I don't think anybody really cares.
Edge aliases ::-webkit-input-placeholder to ::-ms-input-placeholder at parse
time as well, as can be seen in:
```
let s = document.createElement('style');
s.innerHTML = `input::-webkit-input-placeholder { color: red };`;
document.body.appendChild(s);
document.body.innerHTML = s.sheet.cssRules[0].cssText;
```
And I think this is more consistent with what we do for CSS properties that are
aliases.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2595
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3ImDWamJhxh
This saves about 37 KiB of memory across the UA style sheets.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EoZnlmyWwxX
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cd8ef0ba838618f9a4583b7d9896caa3a0602199
The '-moz-menulist-button' value currently behavies identically to the
'menulist-button' value. This is not implemented as an alias because later
patches in this patch series will change the behavior of our pre-existing
'menulist-button' value to more closely match what Chrome does.
The '-moz-menulist-button' value currently behavies identically to the
'menulist-button' value. This is not implemented as an alias because later
patches in this patch series will change the behavior of our pre-existing
'menulist-button' value to more closely match what Chrome does.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b66bf6427db5be2eb12f4e0aa36d22a4da46555a
Always assume allowed-for-all-content. There are a couple callers which weren't
doing that:
* A unit test -> removed.
* ComputeAnimationDistance: Used for testing (in transitions_per_property), and
for the animation inspector. The animation inspector shouldn't show
non-enabled properties. The transitions_per_property test already relies on
getComputedStyle stuff which only uses eForAllContent.
* GetCSSImageURLs: I added this API for the context menu page and such. It
doesn't rely on non-enabled-everywhere properties, it was only using
eInChrome because it was a ChromeOnly API, but it doesn't really need this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2514
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4VOi5Su3Bos
And general Element logging. We now print all the attributes for comparison.
If this turns out to be too verbose we can change it to diff them or something.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2471
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Gl9AumdnvZ
:root can't change without getting unbound from the tree so no fancy stuff other
than that needed.
This removes a lot of revalidation and attribute invalidation matching from the
Chrome, and looks like it should be a good idea in general.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2462
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9B0EO9teczi
We have a different order in nsCSSPropertyId for no good reason. The only
invariant there is that longhands come before shorthands, and shorthands before
aliases.
Luckily that's also an invariant that NonCustomPropertyId has, so we can reuse
them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2463
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1hsQu6hmqiN
The patch at bug 1478391 comment 6 changed the way the math in Scrollbarbutton*
worked, which pretty surely caused this.
Restore the original order and math to be the same as before bug 1478391.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CK3iOqeX2NW
This builds on bug 1428676 and introduces StyleAppearance, which replaces the
NS_THEME_* constants.
Really sorry for the size of the patch.
There's a non-trivial change in the gtk theme, which I submitted separately as
bug 1478385.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2361
MozReview-Commit-ID: DiSmMWK7Krp
We use the same setup WR uses, which is checking-in the files.
But I think it's much better than keeping the two things in sync manually :)
When you add a new value, you need to add it to the rust source, then run the
command, but since it doesn't need to build the style crate (it uses the Rust
AST, doesn't build) there's no problem.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2354
MozReview-Commit-ID: DnXkNAzP54H
We use the same setup WR uses, which is checking-in the files.
But I think it's much better than keeping the two things in sync manually :)
When you add a new value, you need to add it to the rust source, then run the
command, but since it doesn't need to build the style crate (it uses the Rust
AST, doesn't build) there's no problem.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2354
MozReview-Commit-ID: DnXkNAzP54H
The values in the boolean context depend on its feature. For examples, in the
case of prefers-reduced-motion 'no-preference' means false and 'reduced' mean
true in the boolean context, whereas in the case of prefers-contrast
'no-preference' means false and other two values, 'high' and 'low' means true
in the boolean context. To support it we introduce a child struct of
nsCSSKTableEntry that has an additional field representing the value in the
boolean context and use it when we have no specified value in the media feature
(i.e. in the boolean context).
MozReview-Commit-ID: 79HiW8l5ous
I put Balance as the first item in StyleColumnFill because it is the default
value.
MozReview-Commit-ID: A4DVMLL6XBa
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8c8d07b724bcd49dd4f4057fcbf0ccd46ed591ff
NS_STYLE_COLUMN_COUNT_UNLIMITED is unused, so I remove it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HLHLn9ZbkUY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9bf00e1db00051c4454719e205633717fabde050