With clang-cl and PGO enabled, toolchain.configure automatically turns
on LTO for compatibility with MSVC. However, MOZ_PGO is set for both the
profile-generate and profile-use builds in a 3-tier PGO setup via
imply_option(), but we only want LTO enabled for the profile-use build
(see bug 1483778).
For 1-tier PGO builds, which are still used by local developers, MOZ_PGO
will be set and --enable-profile-generate will be unset, so LTO will be
automatically enabled. The profiledbuild target in make is responsible
for disabling MOZ_LTO on the profile-generate build.
For 3-tier PGO builds, MOZ_PGO will still be set, so we can skip setting
LTO in configure when --enable-profile-generate is set.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34800
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Windows finds llvm-profdata in the PATH, in contrast to Linux or Android
builds that set LLVM_PROFDATA as an environment variable in mozconfigs.
The pgo_profile_path() configure checks should still work in this case.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34799
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In the clang-cl 9 case where we have semicolon-separated paths, the `dirs` variable is never read, so the libclang detection fails.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35825
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
- `info.type in ('clang-cl', 'clang', 'gcc')` is always true since MSVC
support was removed.
- For some reason, we didn't enforce C++14 on GCC.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34990
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We've been relying on frame pointers being indirectly enabled via things
like --enable-profiling for some time, but this doesn't scale because
some things may want frame pointers while wanting --disable-profiling.
So we move MOZ_FRAMEPTR_FLAGS to python configure and add a new option
to decide whether to enable frame pointers or not.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34117
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Bug 1394825 bumped the minimum version of clang we use on automation,
for the base toolchain jobs, and there's a libclang test for bindgen,
but we should reject the compiler in the first place.
The check to do that works in both C and C++, contrary to the original
3.6 test that was checking a C++ feature ; the test was later changed
for 3.9, using a check that would have worked in both C and C++, but
the C exception was left around. We remove it now.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34083
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Stand-alone JS builds now default to without-NSPR on all platforms.
Note that the JS shell builds we do in automation pass --enable-nspr-build so they shouldn't be affected by
the JS shell changes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D33933
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Use the same logic as for --with-android-sdk to use the NDK downloaded
by mach bootstrap by default.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34251
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We make it have a default value only if the corresponding directory exists,
and make it throw a more explicit error when the explicitly given directory
doesn't exist.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34250
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The current logic is that if the compiler somehow uses gold rather than
BFD ld by default, we let it, but if it uses BFD ld, we default to lld.
When doing Android builds, the compiler finds the linker in the NDK, and
the default `ld` binary is gold. So we currently end up using fold for
Android builds.
Here, we change the logic such that we use lld when the default linker
the compiler uses is either BFD ld or gold. We can't go with "is not
lld" because the other possible kind, ld64, is what we actually want to
use on mac, since lld doesn't support mach-o fully just yet.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34040
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The current logic is that if the compiler somehow uses gold rather than
BFD ld by default, we let it, but if it uses BFD ld, we default to lld.
When doing Android builds, the compiler finds the linker in the NDK, and
the default `ld` binary is gold. So we currently end up using gold for
Android builds.
Here, we change the logic such that we use lld when the default linker
the compiler uses is either BFD ld or gold. We can't go with "is not
lld" because the other possible kind, ld64, is what we actually want to
use on mac, since lld doesn't support mach-o fully just yet.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34040
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The current setup for bindgen relies on either finding clang/libclang
from the output of llvm-config, or from the paths given via the
configure flags --with-clang-path/--with-libclang-path.
One _very_ common problem is that the llvm-config we end up using does
not correspond to the clang used for compilation, which has some
undesirable side effect, like failing to build.
So instead of relying on llvm-config, we do the following:
- when the compiler is clang, we just use that
- when the compiler is clang-cl, we use clang from the same directory
- otherwise, we either try to find clang in PATH, or rely on
--with-clang-path.
Once clang is found, we try to deduce the location of the corresponding
libclang via the output of `clang -print-search-dirs`, or rely on
--with-libclang-path.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D33241
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This change is a little bit of a cheat, because of course MSVC doesn't
do cross-language LTO by default, but it seems consistent.
Depends on D33317
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D33318
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
- DISABLE_SHARED_JS and DISABLE_EXPORT_JS have been deprecated for 3
years,
- MOZ_JEMALLOC4 has been deprecated for 2 years.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32928
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This form of instrumentation is more like our other platforms, and also
opens the possibility of interacting properly with Rust IR-level PGO.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31133
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
e10s profiling or IR-based PGO instrumentation will both produce
multiple `.profraw` files that need to be handled in some way. Since
clang's `-fprofile-generate` option takes a directory, it seems fitting
to make `--with-pgo-profile-path` mirror that by taking a directory, and
letting `merge_profdata.py` deal with whatever files it might find in
said directory.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32389
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Our current OS X builds use `--target=x86_64-darwin11` (which
corresponds to OS X 10.7). This target is problematic for two reasons:
* We're actually targeting for OS X 10.9 (`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`);
* It's slightly different from the default Rust target.
Let's address these problems in reverse order: differences from the Rust
target are bad, because the `--target` we provide to `clang` and the
Rust target find their way into LLVM bitcode files and the linker will
refuse to link together bitcode files that have incompatible targets.
Why are the two incompatible? The current `--target` doesn't have a
"vendor" in triple-speak, whereas the Rust one has "apple" as the
vendor (`x86_64-apple-darwin`) We therefore need to change the
`--target` we pass to `clang` to have a vendor of "apple".
This need is behind the {init,toolchain}.configure changes,
but it has ramifications elsewhere, because `clang` looks for
`--target`-prefixed build tools. So we have to change the `--target`
for cctools to get the right tool prefixes and we have to change the
`--target` for building clang ourselves so that *those* builds can find
the newly renamed cctools.
Once we've done, that's really enough; we don't *need to address the
first problem: While the `--target` might be `x86_64-apple-darwin11`,
both `clang` and `rustc` will dynamically choose the target triple that
eventually lands in LLVM bitcode files based on
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, which we set in all builds. But the current
target is slightly misleading, and the cctools don't need to be prefixed
with a particular Darwin version, since they work for all Darwin
targets. Let's just drop the "11" from the `--target` and eliminate a
little bit of confusion.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Our current OS X builds use `--target=x86_64-darwin11` (which
corresponds to OS X 10.7). This target is problematic for two reasons:
* We're actually targeting for OS X 10.9 (`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`);
* It's slightly different from the default Rust target.
Let's address these problems in reverse order: differences from the Rust
target are bad, because the `--target` we provide to `clang` and the
Rust target find their way into LLVM bitcode files and the linker will
refuse to link together bitcode files that have incompatible targets.
Why are the two incompatible? The current `--target` doesn't have a
"vendor" in triple-speak, whereas the Rust one has "apple" as the
vendor (`x86_64-apple-darwin`) We therefore need to change the
`--target` we pass to `clang` to have a vendor of "apple".
This need is behind the {init,toolchain}.configure changes,
but it has ramifications elsewhere, because `clang` looks for
`--target`-prefixed build tools. So we have to change the `--target`
for cctools to get the right tool prefixes and we have to change the
`--target` for building clang ourselves so that *those* builds can find
the newly renamed cctools.
Once we've done, that's really enough; we don't *need to address the
first problem: While the `--target` might be `x86_64-apple-darwin11`,
both `clang` and `rustc` will dynamically choose the target triple that
eventually lands in LLVM bitcode files based on
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, which we set in all builds. But the current
target is slightly misleading, and the cctools don't need to be prefixed
with a particular Darwin version, since they work for all Darwin
targets. Let's just drop the "11" from the `--target` and eliminate a
little bit of confusion.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Our current OS X builds use `--target=x86_64-darwin11` (which
corresponds to OS X 10.7). This target is problematic for two reasons:
* We're actually targeting for OS X 10.9 (`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`);
* It's slightly different from the default Rust target.
Let's address these problems in reverse order: differences from the Rust
target are bad, because the `--target` we provide to `clang` and the
Rust target find their way into LLVM bitcode files and the linker will
refuse to link together bitcode files that have incompatible targets.
Why are the two incompatible? The current `--target` doesn't have a
"vendor" in triple-speak, whereas the Rust one has "apple" as the
vendor (`x86_64-apple-darwin`) We therefore need to change the
`--target` we pass to `clang` to have a vendor of "apple".
This need is behind the {init,toolchain}.configure changes,
but it has ramifications elsewhere, because `clang` looks for
`--target`-prefixed build tools. So we have to change the `--target`
for cctools to get the right tool prefixes and we have to change the
`--target` for building clang ourselves so that *those* builds can find
the newly renamed cctools.
Once we've done, that's really enough; we don't *need to address the
first problem: While the `--target` might be `x86_64-apple-darwin11`,
both `clang` and `rustc` will dynamically choose the target triple that
eventually lands in LLVM bitcode files based on
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, which we set in all builds. But the current
target is slightly misleading, and the cctools don't need to be prefixed
with a particular Darwin version, since they work for all Darwin
targets. Let's just drop the "11" from the `--target` and eliminate a
little bit of confusion.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We need this to auto-generate the copy-constructor for TransformOperation,
without which the patch wouldn't build.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30799
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Having `rustc` be `rustup`'s wrapper for `rustc` means that we may
silently honor `rustup`'s override mechanisms. We noticed this first on
OS X, where we use the "real" `cargo` but `rustup`'s `rustc` wrapper,
and problems ensued when `cargo` thought it was using one version of
`rustc`, but actually wound up using something different.
It seems better to avoid silently interposing `rustup`'s toolchain
override mechanisms everywhere, rather than having to special-case OS
X. So let's factor out a general mechanism for removing the wrappers
`rustup` provides and use that for both `rustc` and `cargo`. The tests
need adjusting because we weren't triggering the unwrapping cases
before; we don't yet test the case where we really do need to unwrap.
That test can be left for a future patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29531
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We've not been checking the clang-cl version in use. This lack of
checking is bad, for a couple of reasons:
* Released versions of clang-cl differ drastically in their robustness;
* Only the most recent version of clang-cl supports aarch64.
We should check for a minimum version of clang-cl, just like our other
supported compilers. As a bonus, we can then start depending on
features that we know appear in the particular minimum clang-cl
version. (The current patch is motivated by `/clang:` command-line
support, but one could pick other things.)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30723
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This option is for performing LTO between C++ code and Rust code. The
actual build pieces for Rust code are coming in the next patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28508
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando