Граф коммитов

15 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Bill McCloskey 9edd615af7 Bug 1382922 - Refactor event queue to allow multiple implementations (r=erahm)
This patch refactors the nsThread event queue to clean it up and to make it easier to restructure. The fundamental concepts are as follows:

Each nsThread will have a pointer to a refcounted SynchronizedEventQueue. A SynchronizedEQ takes care of doing the locking and condition variable work when posting and popping events. For the actual storage of events, it delegates to an AbstractEventQueue data structure. It keeps a UniquePtr to the AbstractEventQueue that it uses for storage.

Both SynchronizedEQ and AbstractEventQueue are abstract classes. There is only one concrete implementation of SynchronizedEQ in this patch, which is called ThreadEventQueue. ThreadEventQueue uses locks and condition variables to post and pop events the same way nsThread does. It also encapsulates the functionality that DOM workers need to implement their special event loops (PushEventQueue and PopEventQueue). In later Quantum DOM work, I plan to have another SynchronizedEQ implementation for the main thread, called SchedulerEventQueue. It will have special code for the cooperatively scheduling threads in Quantum DOM.

There are two concrete implementations of AbstractEventQueue in this patch: EventQueue and PrioritizedEventQueue. EventQueue replaces the old nsEventQueue. The other AbstractEventQueue implementation is PrioritizedEventQueue, which uses multiple queues for different event priorities.

The final major piece here is ThreadEventTarget, which splits some of the code for posting events out of nsThread. Eventually, my plan is for multiple cooperatively scheduled nsThreads to be able to share a ThreadEventTarget. In this patch, though, each nsThread has its own ThreadEventTarget. The class's purpose is just to collect some related code together.

One final note: I tried to avoid virtual dispatch overhead as much as possible. Calls to SynchronizedEQ methods do use virtual dispatch, since I plan to use different implementations for different threads with Quantum DOM. But all the calls to EventQueue methods should be non-virtual. Although the methods are declared virtual, all the classes used are final and the concrete classes involved should all be known through templatization.

MozReview-Commit-ID: 9Evtr9oIJvx
2017-08-16 20:55:43 -07:00
Bill McCloskey c6c1f4bbc9 Bug 1385413 - Remove thread parameter from onDispatchedEvent (r=erahm)
This parameter isn't used by any implementation of onDispatchedEvent,
and keeping the parameter makes later refactorings in this bug more difficult.

MozReview-Commit-ID: 90VY2vYtwCW
2017-07-28 13:09:06 -07:00
Bill McCloskey 5ddda3bb77 Bug 1361164 - Add infallible IsOnCurrentThread to nsIEventTarget (r=froydnj)
MozReview-Commit-ID: 12bk9hQ7Wnv
2017-06-12 20:20:08 -07:00
Xidorn Quan f569fa65f9 Bug 1238404 - Use 'using' directive instead of having separate Dispatch impl in subclasses of nsIEventTarget. r=froydnj
--HG--
extra : source : 76255b192a7d6dae74f19c68653537d5f8f39775
2016-01-12 15:18:47 +11:00
Kyle Huey 76e3009ab8 Bug 1179909: Refactor stable state handling. r=smaug
This is motivated by three separate but related problems:

1. Our concept of recursion depth is broken for things that run from AfterProcessNextEvent observers (e.g. Promises). We decrement the recursionDepth counter before firing observers, so a Promise callback running at the lowest event loop depth has a recursion depth of 0 (whereas a regular nsIRunnable would be 1). This is a problem because it's impossible to distinguish a Promise running after a sync XHR's onreadystatechange handler from a top-level event (since the former runs with depth 2 - 1 = 1, and the latter runs with just 1).

2. The nsIThreadObserver mechanism that is used by a lot of code to run "after" the current event is a poor fit for anything that runs script. First, the order the observers fire in is the order they were added, not anything fixed by spec. Additionally, running script can cause the event loop to spin, which is a big source of pain here (bholley has some nasty bug caused by this).

3. We run Promises from different points in the code for workers and main thread. The latter runs from XPConnect's nsIThreadObserver callbacks, while the former runs from a hardcoded call to run Promises in the worker event loop. What workers do is particularly problematic because it means we can't get the right recursion depth no matter what we do to nsThread.

The solve this, this patch does the following:

1. Consolidate some handling of microtasks and all handling of stable state from appshell and WorkerPrivate into CycleCollectedJSRuntime.
2. Make the recursionDepth counter only available to CycleCollectedJSRuntime (and its consumers) and remove it from the nsIThreadInternal and nsIThreadObserver APIs.
3. Adjust the recursionDepth counter so that microtasks run with the recursionDepth of the task they are associated with.
4. Introduce the concept of metastable state to replace appshell's RunBeforeNextEvent. Metastable state is reached after every microtask or task is completed. This provides the semantics that bent and I want for IndexedDB, where transactions autocommit at the end of a microtask and do not "spill" from one microtask into a subsequent microtask. This differs from appshell's RunBeforeNextEvent in two ways:
a) It fires between microtasks, which was the motivation for starting this.
b) It no longer ensures that we're at the same event loop depth in the native event queue. bent decided we don't care about this.
5. Reorder stable state to happen after microtasks such as Promises, per HTML. Right now we call the regular thread observers, including appshell, before the main thread observer (XPConnect), so stable state tasks happen before microtasks.
2015-08-11 06:10:46 -07:00
Ben Turner 3233aad341 Bug 939196 - Allow nsThread to have nested event queues, r=bsmedberg.
--HG--
extra : transplant_source : %DE%AF%BF%7E%94%5E%07%CDL%9C%01%28%9F6%8D%90%12%95%06s
2013-11-14 10:06:17 -08:00
Ben Turner 4d2b15f34c Bug 939182 - Add 'eventWasProcessed' argument to nsIThreadObserver::afterProcessNextEvent(), r=bsmedberg.
--HG--
extra : transplant_source : %5E%80p%D6%C6A%23%0AZ%06%23%16%155%DB%CE%F5%5CEx
2013-10-23 05:01:20 -07:00
Gervase Markham 82ff7027aa Bug 716478 - update licence to MPL 2. 2012-05-21 12:12:37 +01:00
Benjamin Smedberg d14fc6c435 Bug 719154, remove the implementation of chained and filtered event queues now that they are no longer needed, r=jlebar
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 54e3f130dfaf59e67974019e39bf85471b22b4bf
2012-03-23 14:45:41 -04:00
Ben Turner 257389646e Bug 665579: Merge nsIThreadInternal and nsIThreadInternal2. r=bsmedberg 2011-06-24 14:12:54 -07:00
Ben Turner 72ea70e7b6 Bug 612807 - 'IndexedDB: Transaction thread observer isn't quite safe'. r=jst, a=blocking+. 2010-11-18 14:19:19 -08:00
Ben Turner 488481b966 Bug 608186 - 'IndexedDB: Transactions should expire when we return to the event loop'. r=sicking, a=blocking+ 2010-11-15 13:49:49 -08:00
ben turner abb2a26ac0 Bug 498010 - Threads should release their observers when they are shut down; r=benjamin 2009-06-22 15:08:04 +02:00
mark%moxienet.com a6b04ae8c0 340032 nsIThreadObserver needs a method called after processing an event to support Cocoa autorelease pools. r=darin sr=bryner 2006-06-07 00:06:11 +00:00
darin%meer.net 0318b8c707 landing patch for bug 326273 "Implement nsIThreadManager" (Mac portions by Mark Mentovai) with reviews from bienvenu, bsmedberg, bzbarsky, josh, roc, and ssieb 2006-05-10 17:30:15 +00:00