These tests modify details or summary elements in the 'click' event
listener in capturing phase higher up in the DOM tree.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Lp5OzXnNgL4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5772a84795b1b8b6b9bb6cbf928bfb612eb07971
If the main summary element has 'display: none' style, it won't
generates a summary frame as the first child of the details.
However, if a details element have two summaries and the first summary
has 'display: none', the second summary still generates a SummaryFrame
event if it isn't the main summary. So instead of checking on the
SummaryFrame as before, I check the content tree for the main summary by
using the idea in bug 1245424 comment 8. Another reason might be the
potential removal of SummaryFrame in bug 1258657.
MozReview-Commit-ID: H0evZ17zj5k
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 1aad3ad1d31dc277771013f92eace5cefa7d6112
I have confirmed that by adding this, we end up calling SwapElements() on the
mPropertyValues member when we build up the nsTArray<Keyframe> result in
GetKeyframeListFromPropertyIndexedKeyframe. Without this explicit move
constructor (i.e. with only the default move constructor) the copy-constructor
for mPropertyValues is called.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6IWkP97RFUr
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4ac4b6545337810a3047f2cfb1dac86074116cfb
StyleAnimationValue::ComputeValue(s) will automatically look up the style
context of the supplied element. This is mostly fine, but when we start using
this method in scenarios where we are building the initial style context
(as happens later in this patch series) it can easily land us in a situation
where we iterate indefinitely.
It would be better, instead, to just explicitly pass in the style context we
want to use, as we already do for StyleAnimationValue::ExtractComputedValue.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ZoVBlBRRBI
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9012cc2e405fc887f070fbfaa2f9853289882862
Once we tweak moz.build in the next patch, the grouping in the unified build
will change and expose these missing includes so we fix them here, first.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GebEEociwTo
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 18158fdf8a3c1a1dcf446118371cad1a15fd4daf
Specifically, for the 'composite' member on keyframes, we now indicate "use the
composite value specified on the effect" using a missing/undefined 'composite'
member as opposed to a null value.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ZH45GvCTlP
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5acf081fb844f81280765a87ec019b7847ca1885
Before we begin re-arranging KeyframeEffect.h we move ComputedTiming aside
since putting it in a separate file should make navigating the source
easier.
MozReview-Commit-ID: L5GTFAo00sh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e88b6ea092c459afa90831de8469697454e00c5a
The former is only used inconsequentially in tests. The second is not used at
all.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4cfe11f933f1fe8f788e823c5107941085cef92c
This reduces memory usage by up to 3 MiB per process.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Gfs9PIJM4br
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 69ac5acf7f7f0c802a047f5bf72838e5c4d1f123
This was in a previously reviewed patch. I dropped the change because I
thought the underlying warning had been fixed. I was wrong.
MozReview-Commit-ID: J9B34YhJ3z0
--HG--
extra : source : ea446df75d17331a7c0736ef3303bf9a07d8d9f0