This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is pretty much the same as ScrollStyles::IsSmoothScroll right now,
but in the next commit, we will no longer propagate scroll-behavior on <body> to
the root element so that nsIScrollableFrame::IsSmoothScroll will be changed
to reflect it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35737
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Per the discussion in:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/P79pwa9z5m8/iPYPAWPHCAAJ
They should be CamelCase, and that's what most of them already do. This converts
the rest, which are a few.
For the ones that already used `e` or `k` prefixes, I've mostly done:
for file in $(rg Type::e layout | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq); do sed -i 's#Type::e#Type::#g' $file; done
For the ones that used uppercase, I've removed the prefix if it was already in
the type name, and turn them into CamelCase.
Depends on D28680
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28681
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In the case where scroll-snap-type is specified for the scroll container, the
scroll-padding is also factored into in ScrollFrameHelper::ComputeScrollSnapInfo
which is called via ScrollFrameHelper::ScrollToWithOrigin. It doesn't double
the scroll-padding value, but it's actually redundant, we should avoid it.
We could separate the functionality of ScrollToWithOrigin, one is to scroll
to a given element, the other is to scroll to a given position. The former will
be used for Element.scrollIntoElement and relevant stuff, the latter will be
used for Element.scrollTo and relevant stuff. That's being said, as of now, we
have still the old scroll snap implementation, so the separation will introduce
complexity, the separation should be done once after the old implementation
removed.
There are 9 call sites of nsIPresShell::ScrollContentIntoView:
nsIPresShell::GoToAnchor
nsIPresShell::ScrollToAnchor
Element::ScrollIntoView
We definitely needs scroll-padding and scroll-margin for these functions.
nsCoreUtils::ScrollTo
This is used for Accesible::ScrollTo which scrolls to a given accesible node,
probably we should behave as what Element::ScrollIntoView does.
Accessible::DispatchClickEvent
Similar to the above, similated various mouse events on a given target node.
PresShell::EventHandler::PrepareToUseCaretPosition
PresShell::EventHandler::GetCurrentItemAndPositionForElement
Both are for context menu, we shouldn't consider scroll-padding and
scroll-margin.
nsFormFillController::SetPopupOpen
This is used for autocompletion popup, we shouldn't consider scroll-padding
and scroll-margin.
nsFocusManager::ScrollIntoView
This is bit unfortunate, we should use scroll-padding and scroll-margin
depending on call site of this function. Bug 1535232 is for this case.
cssom-view/scrollIntoView-scrollPadding.html which has some tests that is
actually testing scroll-padding with scrollIntoView passes with this change.
The reftest in this change is a test case that the browser navigates to an
element with specifying the anchor to the element.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23084
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
From the spec [1];
Using the scroll-snap-type property on the relevant scroll container, the
author can request a particular bias for the scrollport to land on a snap
position after scrolling operations (including programmatic scrolls such
as the scrollTo() method).
The target here are functions exposed in web contents other than
Element.scrollIntoView which will be changed in the next commit.
[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap-1/#overview
Depends on D21624
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D21625
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This allows this enumeration to be used from nsIPresShell.h without introducing
a circular dependency.
Its new home in layout/base/ScrollTypes.h, included as mozilla/ScrollTypes.h.
Others similar enums can be added to that file if desired.
This patch also makes ScrollMode an enum class (as it's no longer nested
inside a class) and switches its enumerators to the |eName| naming convention.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24796
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch renames nsIPresShell::SetPendingVisualScrollUpdate() to
ScrollToVisual(), and adds an instant vs. smooth option.
SetPendingVisualScrollUpdate() still exists, as a helper for the instant case.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24553
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is what Chrome does.
documentElement-clientWidth-on-minimum-scale-size.tentative.html was the test
case for this but unfortunately it was disabled in bug 1515043. And it seems
that the test case failed on Android in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19461
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This commit adds a barebones class called 'ScrollAnchorContainer' that will
contain most of the logic for scroll anchoring. It is owned as a member of
ScrollFrameHelper, and has the same lifetime.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13267
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 41f6f7691af60401f18f98a89f1878cfad2e74d3
extra : source : 3033401ef320414ef5f489c53526d015c38a89d7
This commit adds a barebones class called 'ScrollAnchorContainer' that will
contain most of the logic for scroll anchoring. It is owned as a member of
ScrollFrameHelper, and has the same lifetime.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13267
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4d58b51aa6b893392d7c152d27750ebda059f784
extra : histedit_source : 9a2841931c47c4358e15d2fa6514ed347e3d0dad
This adds a notification from APZ to the scrollbar's slider frame to
inform it of APZ starting an async scrollbar drag. This is useful
because APZ can start a scrollbar drag and even change the scroll
position before the scrollbar frame even handles the mousedown event. In
such a case, the mousedown can land on where the scrollthumb *used to
be* before it was dragged away. This can result in scroll-to-click
behavior getting triggered and the scrollthumb glitching.
With this patch, the new notification follows the same path as the
request-repaint message, and so is guaranteed to arrive at the scrollbar
before any request-repaint messages. It sets some state that can be used
to correct the behaviour described above.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12364
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This commit attempts to lower the pain of modifying FrameMetrics.h.
It looks like most includes really only want ViewID or
ScrollableLayerGuid, so this commit factors them out into a separate
header. In the process FrameMetrics::ViewID is changed to
ScrollableLayerGuid::ViewID, which personally seems like a better
place for it now that we have RepaintRequest. Unfortunately that
requires a lot of places to be updated.
After this commit there are still a couple of major places that
FrameMetrics is included.
* nsDisplayList.h
* nsIScrollableFrame.h
* Layers.h
Those are going to be more tricky or impossible to fix so they're
not in this commit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10722
--HG--
rename : gfx/layers/FrameMetrics.h => gfx/layers/ScrollableLayerGuid.h
rename : gfx/layers/FrameMetrics.h => gfx/layers/ZoomConstraints.h
extra : rebase_source : 29ac79f91460a181bf7437af5c371207e22858e2
extra : source : c2e70e531075493fc6e374dcec862827f0bc6e77
This commit adds a scroll origin, nsGkAtoms::relative, which can be used to
mark main thread scrolling that can be combined with a concurrent APZ scroll.
The behavior of this is controlled by a pref, apz.relative-update. This pref
is initially activated and is intended as an aid to narrowing down causes
of regressions for users in bug reports.
Relative scroll updates work by tracking the last sent or accepted APZ
scroll offset. This is sent along with every FrameMetrics. Additionally,
a flag is added to FrameMetrics, mIsRelative, indicating whether the
scroll offset can be combined with a potential APZ scroll. When this
flag is set, AsyncPanZoomController will apply the delta between the sent
base scroll offset, and sent new scroll offset.
This flag is controlled by the last scroll origin on nsGfxScrollFrame. The
new origin, `relative`, is marked as being able to clobber APZ updates,
but can only be set if all scrolls since the last repaint request or
layers transaction have been relative.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8234
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 51351a84c9cda228a0975e22eda3fd3bd8d261c4
extra : histedit_source : 4b564c19b16fe2bd26adc671b62b7cb6106e8163
This commit changes `Window::ScrollBy` and `Element::ScrollBy` to use
ScrollByCSSPixels in preparation for marking ScrollByCSSPixels as a
relative scroll API.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8233
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fa82acc12395569bd332573718f8a8013ac20b60
extra : histedit_source : 7ac061e65a2522051ed73f3ba6349d5ea696e15f
We need to correctly populate the cumulative resolution field in the
ScrollMetadata in order to support zooming. Without this, the cumulative
resolution doesn't include the presShell resolution, and that results in
APZ getting into an inconsistent state.
Currently, the cumulative resolution is populated from the
ContainerLayerParameters object's scale, but in the case of WebRender,
we call ComputeScrollMetadata with an empty ContainerLayerParameters
since don't actually do layer building or rasterization in Gecko.
This patch makes this more explicit by changing the argument to a
Maybe<ContainerLayerParameters> and passing Nothing() from the WebRender
call sites.
In this scenario, we just use the cumulative presShell resolution as
the cumulative resolution, which should be correct for WebRender as
we won't have an "extra" CSS-derived resolution applied on the Gecko
side.
Depends on D9120
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9121
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This change also renames several related functions, as well as fields,
and the header is moved into EXPORTS.mozilla given it is defined under
mozilla namespace.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LqCdcW8fmUN
--HG--
rename : layout/base/ScrollbarStyles.cpp => layout/base/ScrollStyles.cpp
rename : layout/base/ScrollbarStyles.h => layout/base/ScrollStyles.h
extra : rebase_source : 8933f3bca88d5db4b9508e3947f695ecf7511b3e
Currently in ContainerState::SetupScrollingMetadata we call
ComputeScrollMetadata for every layer and for each ASR in the layer's
clip chain. If there are many sibling layers with the same clip then
this is largely wasted work.
This change makes us cache the most recently calculated result, and
only recalculate if the ASR or clip is different.
There was a small portion of ComputeScrollMetadata that must actually
be executed for every layer and ASR in its clip chain. This has been moved
to a separate function, ClipLayerToDisplayPort, that is still called
every time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7Zzblmimtc5
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 85ee310ceaaff5fa8a1ccb513ffaf90904ace19d
Currently in ContainerState::SetupScrollingMetadata we call
ComputeScrollMetadata for every layer and for each ASR in the layer's
clip chain. If there are many sibling layers with the same clip then
this is largely wasted work.
This change makes us cache the most recently calculated result, and
only recalculate if the ASR or clip is different.
There was a small portion of ComputeScrollMetadata that must actually
be executed for every layer and ASR in its clip chain. This has been moved
to a separate function, ClipLayerToDisplayPort, that is still called
every time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7Zzblmimtc5
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4554f908f42f761ddb2fca9be6bbe688c194c756
Currently in ContainerState::SetupScrollingMetadata we call
ComputeScrollMetadata for every layer and for each ASR in the layer's
clip chain. If there are many sibling layers with the same clip then
this is largely wasted work.
This change makes us cache the most recently calculated result, and
only recalculate if the ASR or clip is different.
There was a small portion of ComputeScrollMetadata that must actually
be executed for every layer and ASR in its clip chain. This has been moved
to a separate function, ClipLayerToDisplayPort, that is still called
every time.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7Zzblmimtc5
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d39908b2be2565d22079b3e5e8df56316159a918
This patch was generated automatically by the "modeline.py" script, available
here: https://github.com/amccreight/moz-source-tools/blob/master/modeline.py
For every file that is modified in this patch, the changes are as follows:
(1) The patch changes the file to use the exact C++ mode lines from the
Mozilla coding style guide, available here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Mode_Line
(2) The patch deletes any blank lines between the mode line & the MPL
boilerplate comment.
(3) If the file previously had the mode lines and MPL boilerplate in a
single contiguous C++ comment, then the patch splits them into
separate C++ comments, to match the boilerplate in the coding style.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EuRsDue63tK
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3356d4b80ff6213935192e87cdbc9103fec6084c
Most of this change is just fiddling with function signatures so that they take
a LayerManager* instead of a Layer* (or in some cases, both). This allows
the WebRender codepaths to pass a WebRenderLayerManager* instead of having to
produce a Layer* which it doesn't have.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Fb0C8OUVDin
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e4c3324cfa20c295db85d5c09df8d8d77865bb6a
2017-10-25 13:22:04 -04:00
Matt Woodrow ext:(%2C%20Miko%20Mynttinen%20%3Cmikokm%40gmail.com%3E%2C%20Timothy%20Nikkel%20%3Ctnikkel%40gmail.com%3E)
Find the scrollframe for a scrollbar thumb and use it to determine if the scrollthumb is an AGR, instead of recording if the associated scrollframe is active on a frame property during display list building.
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
--HG--
rename : xpcom/ds/nsIAtom.h => xpcom/ds/nsAtom.h
extra : rebase_source : ac3e904a21b8b48e74534fff964f1623ee937c67
NotifyApproximateFrameVisibilityUpdate gets the displayport so we want the base rect set before calling it.
We also don't want to record the displayport if we ignored it in the actual visibility pass.
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Coroiu Cristina
Narcis Beleuzu
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Botond Ballo
Ryan Hunt
Jan Henning
Bogdan Tara
Sylvestre Ledru
Kartikaya Gupta
Jeremy Lempereur
Cosmin Sabou
Xidorn Quan
Jamie Nicol
Andreea Pavel
abhinav
Daniel Holbert
Matt Woodrow ext:(%2C%20Miko%20Mynttinen%20%3Cmikokm%40gmail.com%3E%2C%20Timothy%20Nikkel%20%3Ctnikkel%40gmail.com%3E)
Timothy Nikkel
Nicholas Nethercote
Alexis Beingessner
Sebastian Hengst