This "upgrades" various nsLayoutUtils functions which take as inputs
a set of coordinates and a frame that the coordinates are relative to,
to accept a RelativeTo object instead of a frame.
Most of the patch is just dumb propagation, but the few places where
we use an explicit ViewportType::Visual are important. There are
probably a few other places I've overlooked, but this seems to cover
the important ones that come up commonly.
There are undoubtedly other functions into which we can propagate
RelativeTo, in this patch I've propagated it as far as necessary
for my needs in this bug (mainly GetTransformToAncestor() and
GetEventCoordinatesRelativeTo()).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D68919
This "upgrades" various nsLayoutUtils functions which take as inputs
a set of coordinates and a frame that the coordinates are relative to,
to accept a RelativeTo object instead of a frame.
Most of the patch is just dumb propagation, but the few places where
we use an explicit ViewportType::Visual are important. There are
probably a few other places I've overlooked, but this seems to cover
the important ones that come up commonly.
There are undoubtedly other functions into which we can propagate
RelativeTo, in this patch I've propagated it as far as necessary
for my needs in this bug (mainly GetTransformToAncestor() and
GetEventCoordinatesRelativeTo()).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D68919
This patch computes the author-specified properties during the CSS cascade, and
removes the complex rule-tree-based implementation that tries to do the cascade
again.
This changes behavior in two ways, one of them which is not observable to
content, I believe:
* revert now re-enables the native styling. This was brought up in
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4777 and I think it is a bug-fix.
This is observable to content, and I'm adding a test for it.
* We don't look at inherited styles from our ancestors when `inherit` is
specified in a non-author stylesheet. This was introduced for bug 452969 but
we don't seem to inherit background anymore for file controls or such. It
seems back then file controls used to have a text-field.
I audited forms.css and ua.css and we don't explicitly inherit
padding / border / background-color into any nested form control.
We keep the distinction between border/background and padding, because the later
has some callers. I think we should try to align with Chromium in the long run
and remove the padding bit.
We need to give an appearance to the range-thumb and such so that we can assert
that we don't call HasAuthorSpecifiedRules on non-themed stuff. I used a new
internal value for that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D67722
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch computes the author-specified properties during the CSS cascade, and
removes the complex rule-tree-based implementation that tries to do the cascade
again.
This changes behavior in two ways, one of them which is not observable to
content, I believe:
* revert now re-enables the native styling. This was brought up in
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4777 and I think it is a bug-fix.
This is observable to content, and I'm adding a test for it.
* We don't look at inherited styles from our ancestors when `inherit` is
specified in a non-author stylesheet. This was introduced for bug 452969 but
we don't seem to inherit background anymore for file controls or such. It
seems back then file controls used to have a text-field.
I audited forms.css and ua.css and we don't explicitly inherit
padding / border / background-color into any nested form control.
We keep the distinction between border/background and padding, because the later
has some callers. I think we should try to align with Chromium in the long run
and remove the padding bit.
We need to give an appearance to the range-thumb and such so that we can assert
that we don't call HasAuthorSpecifiedRules on non-themed stuff. I used a new
internal value for that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D67722
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I thought this would fix <input type=number style="user-select: none">, but
turns out it doesn't.
<input type=number> doesn't have the editor root as a root of the anonymous
subtree, so the current hack wouldn't work, as the anon root wouldn't have the
editable flag. So tweak the code a bit to handle stuff in a simpler way than
setting the flags after the fact, and set the NAC-root flag earlier to avoid
the mOuterWrapper->AppendChildTo(root) call forgetting about root's flags.
I had to tweak one AccessibleCaret test, but that's because it uses <textarea>
with user-select: none, and our behavior there is not particularly sane. It just
happened to work because that test-case also had a bunch of contenteditable
elements, and we stop matching this rule:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/220a3bd6063fcbe5ca50e88dcabdc7dee0aca448/layout/style/contenteditable.css#22
Because the anonymous div now properly matches :-moz-read-write, which made the
rule apply and the test work. See comment 4 of this bug.
I'll fix this stuff up and add some tests for our behavior here in bug 1611699.
I refactored the dragdrop tests to cover more input types, but I ended up not
being able to use them because they're dependent on the content.
Instead I added an extra test and changed the refactor so that it applies to
<input type=search>, as there's layout work going on in bug 558594, and it'd be
unfortunate to regress this there too.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D61094
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Instead, subclass nsTextControlFrame. This simplifies the code and avoids
correctness issues.
I kept the localization functionality though it is not spec compliant. But I
filed a bug to remove it in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D57193
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Instead, subclass nsTextControlFrame. This simplifies the code and avoids
correctness issues.
I kept the localization functionality though it is not spec compliant. But I
filed a bug to remove it in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D57193
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The inclusions were removed with the following very crude script and the
resulting breakage was fixed up by hand. The manual fixups did either
revert the changes done by the script, replace a generic header with a more
specific one or replace a header with a forward declaration.
find . -name "*.idl" | grep -v web-platform | grep -v third_party | while read path; do
interfaces=$(grep "^\(class\|interface\).*:.*" "$path" | cut -d' ' -f2)
if [ -n "$interfaces" ]; then
if [[ "$interfaces" == *$'\n'* ]]; then
regexp="\("
for i in $interfaces; do regexp="$regexp$i\|"; done
regexp="${regexp%%\\\|}\)"
else
regexp="$interfaces"
fi
interface=$(basename "$path")
rg -l "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" . | while read path2; do
hits=$(grep -v "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" "$path2" | grep -c "$regexp" )
if [ $hits -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Removing ${interface} from ${path2}"
grep -v "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" "$path2" > "$path2".tmp
mv -f "$path2".tmp "$path2"
fi
done
fi
done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D55443
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It seems better to convert this before adding a new flag (in bug
1547759) and risking replacing the wrong 0 with a flag.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40562
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We previously (in bug 1491235) adjusted some utility code to make
layout-contained frames behave as if they have no baseline.
But that's not sufficient. To make frames fully report lack-of-a-baseline,
we now do the following for layout-contained frames, as of this patch:
(a) We now leave the ReflowOutput outparam's BlockStartAscent member at its
default value (which is what we do for frames without a baseline like
e.g. nsCheckboxRadioFrame and nsHTMLCanvasFrame). And if the parent cares
about the baseline, it'll then ask directly, using a baseline getter.
(b) We now return 'false' in more implementations of bool-returning
baseline-getter-methods (where 'false' indicates 'no baseline').
(c) We now return the margin-box-bottom edge, in the nscoord-returning
'GetLogicalBaseline()' getter method. (We typically do this by deferring
to the inherited method, which ultimately comes from nsFrame's
implementation). It's appropriate to use the margin-box-bottom edge when
there's no baseline, per the definition of 'vertical-align: baseline',
here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
Depends on D32182
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We previously (in bug 1491235) adjusted some utility code to make
layout-contained frames behave as if they have no baseline.
But that's not sufficient. To make frames fully report lack-of-a-baseline,
we now do the following for layout-contained frames, as of this patch:
(a) We now leave the ReflowOutput outparam's BlockStartAscent member at its
default value (which is what we do for frames without a baseline like
e.g. nsCheckboxRadioFrame and nsHTMLCanvasFrame). And if the parent cares
about the baseline, it'll then ask directly, using a baseline getter.
(b) We now return 'false' in more implementations of bool-returning
baseline-getter-methods (where 'false' indicates 'no baseline').
(c) We now return the margin-box-bottom edge, in the nscoord-returning
'GetLogicalBaseline()' getter method. (We typically do this by deferring
to the inherited method, which ultimately comes from nsFrame's
implementation). It's appropriate to use the margin-box-bottom edge when
there's no baseline, per the definition of 'vertical-align: baseline',
here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
Depends on D32182
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Additionally, this patch makes `nsFrame.h` stop including `nsIPresShell.h`
and makes each users include `mozilla/PresShell.h` instead. So, this improves
rebuild performance of `nsIPresShell.h` (and `mozilla/PresShell.h` in the
future).
Note that due to `nsIFrame::PresShell()`, `mozilla::` prefix is necessary for
`PresShell` in a lot of classes which are derived from `nsIFrame` even in
`.cpp` files.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27476
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
- Remove expectation that 'preventScroll.html' fails.
- Use '[NoInterfaceObject] interface' workaround to simulate missing 'mixin' support.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26922
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is more consistent with what the Rust bits of the style system do, and
removes a pointer from ComputedStyle which is always nice.
This also aligns the Rust bits with the C++ bits re. not treating xul pseudos as
anonymous boxes. See the comment in nsTreeStyleCache.cpp regarding those.
Can't wait for XUL trees to die.
Depends on D19001
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19002
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
This builds on bug 1428676 and introduces StyleAppearance, which replaces the
NS_THEME_* constants.
Really sorry for the size of the patch.
There's a non-trivial change in the gtk theme, which I submitted separately as
bug 1478385.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2361
MozReview-Commit-ID: DiSmMWK7Krp
It's not needed anymore, since we tag the pseudo-elements at creation time for
styling.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2330
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7j4DVEHXYIC
This patch basically does:
* remove StyleSetHandle and its corresponding files
* revisit #includes of related header files and change correspondingly
* change nsIPresShell::mStyleSet to be UniquePtr<ServoStyleSet>
* change the creating path of ServoStyleSet to pass UniquePtr
* change other mentions of StyleSetHandle to ServoStyleSet*
* remove AsServo() calls on ServoStyleSet
Some unfortunate bits:
* some methods of (Servo)StyleSet only accepts ServoStyleSheet while
many places call into the methods with StyleSheet, so there are many
->AsServo() added to sheets
MozReview-Commit-ID: K4zYnuhOurA
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 459e8efeb171adad089d94272e143e8c244bd279
extra : source : 65ba2f174fcf7dba4e59c00ee8908b1bd0820a48
I left some IgnoredErrorResults for now where people warn on failure. We could
consider adding a WarnOnError() thing or something.
MozReview-Commit-ID: L5ttZ9CGKg0
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Tim Nguyen
Cameron McCormack
Simon Giesecke
Botond Ballo
Csoregi Natalia
Razvan Maries
Mihai Alexandru Michis
Oana Pop Rus
pbz
Gabriele Svelto
Mats Palmgren
L. David Baron
Ting-Yu Lin
Daniel Holbert
Andreea Pavel
Masayuki Nakano
Mirko Brodesser
Ryan Hunt
Ehsan Akhgari
Sylvestre Ledru
Zhang Junzhi
Jeff Gilbert
Boris Zbarsky
Xidorn Quan