We don't need to expose on both Window and System anymore, as Window now
implies System. I don't remove unnecessary [Exposed=Window] annotations, as
WebIDL upstream has removed PrimaryGlobal.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9399
We don't need to expose on both Window and System anymore, as Window now
implies System. I don't remove unnecessary [Exposed=Window] annotations, as
WebIDL upstream has removed PrimaryGlobal.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9399
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0e4d66fb7eab68c14fad10e3c5876bc491452e22
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6b5101e05d2f0588e831c0a7d1239a3dcb65ddcb
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cb13b24696ee97b611c318b407ea9c31215df3f6
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cb13b24696ee97b611c318b407ea9c31215df3f6
See the design doc[1] for further info. We would like to redesign
the places observer system to be more performant and more friendly
to consume. WebIDL was recommended as it simplifies creating simple
dictionary payloads while allowing dynamic typing with `any`.
There were some difficulties with WebIDL though, most of which
revolved around allowing consumers to be weakly referenced, from
both C++ and JS. The simplest solution I could come up with was to
create a simple native interface for the C++ case, and a WebIDL
wrapper for a JS callback in the JS case. Suggestions for simpler
alternatives are very welcome though.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G45vfd6RXFXwNz7i4FV40lDCU0ao-JX_bZdgJV4tLjk/edit?usp=sharing
MozReview-Commit-ID: ACnAEfa5WxO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7e140df5961c5a01c13b1fd2489905f61c83959f
Siddhant085
shindli
Boris Zbarsky
Nika Layzell
Daniel Varga
Doug Thayer
Cosmin Sabou
Andrew McCreight
Dorel Luca
Bogdan Tara
arthur.iakab