This will save us some time from figuring out what's the best thing to do in
bug 1552587, so that other patches I have in flight (mainly bug 1552708) can
land, since we cannot add a single byte to nsStyleDisplay right now otherwise.
The code removed here is well isolated and not that complicated, so it seems to
me that should be easy to bring back should we have an emergency (and I commit
to doing that while preserving the nsStyleDisplay size limit if we need to :)).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32026
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I did this instead of just (ab)using the fact that every list item has at least
one counter-increment node because:
* I don't have the bullet frame around by the time we initially compute the
counter increment, which means that I'd need to grow nsBlockFrame / add a
frame property for the list item ordinal, which I think would be unfortunate.
* It feels more consistent with the way regular CSS counters work and with the
way we want ::marker to eventually work.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31990
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When you have a ::after::marker, and you compare one against the other we ended
up with the wrong result because of the pseudotype stuff.
I think this is cleaner now that DoCompareTreePosition handles pseudos properly
(which is really the thing this was working around).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31989
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I'm going to need it to fix the counters code in presence of nested
pseudo-elements.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31988
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I thought I was going to need it but turns out I don't. Still this is worth it I
think.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31987
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We don't store post-transform overflow areas for frames within preserve-3d, but we do store pre-transform overflow areas.
Rather than just recomputing the changed overflow for the root, we should recompute overflows for all ancestors up to the 3d root.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31213
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Unpack StyleMotion and move its members into nsStyleDisplay, use
cbindgen to generate StyleOffsetPath.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31164
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This stops nsPrintJob::PrintPreview from duplicating work done in
nsDocumentViewer::PrintPreview.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31811
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 062cbac323a2a1a0bcc85039b3671c650c408efa
extra : amend_source : 39d5b8c316f518aa72d560ae4eeec171561ab8fd
According to the procedure to update animations and send events[1] the UA should
update all timelines first and _then_ run a microtask checkpoint.
As a result, when we run callbacks for the finished promise on an Animation they
should see the fully up-to-date state of all animations, regardless of which
timeline they are attached to.
However, that is currently not the case since we run a microtask checkpoint
after updating each individual timeline.
This difference will become more significant later in this patch series when we
introduce another step--removing replaced animations--that _also_ should happen
before we run the microtask checkpoint (so that the promise callbacks always see
a fully-up-to-date state).
This patch makes our handling a little more in line with the spec. It's not
quite the same because it's possible there may be other refresh driver observers
that trigger a microtask checkpoint in between ticking the different timelines
but that case is expected to be rare and fixing it would require maintaining
a separate queue for timeline observers that we run after all other observers--
so it is probably not necessary to fix that case at this stage.
The test added in this patch fails without the code changes in this patch.
[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#update-animations-and-send-events
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30319
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Most of it is not used at this point, this leaves the parts that are used by
MathML, which are minimal.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31706
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This happens in one test on try server that has some iframes that navigate.
I audited everywhere else that we change the view tree, this seems like the only place it can happen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31399
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We could use ArcSlice if wanted I guess, your call. Though will change is not
supposed to be used very frequently.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30548
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Amend several test files for triggering eval() assertion through simpletest.js
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30474
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This happens in one test on try server that has some iframes that navigate.
I audited everywhere else that we change the view tree, this seems like the only place it can happen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31399
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
However, we continue to only respect a <meta name="viewport"> tag if
dom.meta-viewport.enabled is set.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30988
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If an XPIDL interface has a method or attribute that is [notxpcom],
then it is implicitly treated as [builtinclass], even if it is not
marked as such. For clarity, this patch goes through and marks every
place that relies on this behavior (aside from some test code).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30714
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
There are three test cases;
1) Two iframes are swapped
2) Changing the visibility of the parent document doesn't clobber a child
document's visibility in the case where the child document has been hidden
by another element in the parent document
3) an iframe is initially inside a visibility:hidden element in the parent
document
Depends on D26253
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27842
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Noemi Erli
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Razvan Maries
Daniel Varga
Matt Woodrow
Boris Chiou
Sean Feng
Brendan Dahl
Jonathan Watt
Brian Birtles
Miko Mynttinen
Timothy Nikkel
Csoregi Natalia
Jonas Allmann
Ciure Andrei
Boris Zbarsky
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Botond Ballo
Andrew McCreight
Brad Werth
Nicolas Silva
Masayuki Nakano
Brindusan Cristian