6 Коммитов

Автор	SHA1	Сообщение	Дата
Thomas Wisniewski	c10198c6f1	Bug 140562 - Part 3: Fix up reftests to account for the fact that -moz-focus-inner no longer affects button size. r=dbaron ... --HG-- rename : layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-height-child-1-ref.html => layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-height-child-ref.html rename : layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-height-child-1.html => layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-height-child.html rename : layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-width-child-1-ref.html => layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-width-child-ref.html rename : layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-width-child-1.html => layout/reftests/forms/button/percent-width-child.html	2016-11-30 21:43:32 -05:00
L. David Baron	b64dc1a002	Bug 1010675 - Stop allowing button contents to overflow into the CSS padding and border (although still allow them to overflow into our internal focuspadding when the min-content width says the contents don't fit). r=dholbert ... Note that this replaces the code that allows eroding the space with new code that reduces the focusPadding value. (Also, we previously didn't count the focusPadding towards what could be eroded, which meant we wouldn't quite get to the edge of the padding and border, because we weren't counting the extra for the focusPadding.) The existing reftests that I'm changing from == to != are ones that were specifically testing issues related to erosion of padding. The change to 491180-{1,2}-ref.html is because we now *do* erode the focusPadding, which is 3px in the horizontal dimensions (see the button::-moz-focus-inner styles in forms.css), and that was the only nonzero style on the button in 491180-{1,2}.html. CLOSED TREE (per RyanVM)	2015-03-20 10:27:09 -07:00
Ryan VanderMeulen	00a19ca0b0	Backed out changesets f33123f726b6 and c2724e2f9de9 (bug 1010675) for B2G reftest failures. ... CLOSED TREE	2015-03-20 12:25:49 -04:00
L. David Baron	ee83e8e2bc	Bug 1010675 - Stop allowing button contents to overflow into the CSS padding and border (although still allow them to overflow into our internal focuspadding when the min-content width says the contents don't fit). r=dholbert ... Note that this replaces the code that allows eroding the space with new code that reduces the focusPadding value. (Also, we previously didn't count the focusPadding towards what could be eroded, which meant we wouldn't quite get to the edge of the padding and border, because we weren't counting the extra for the focusPadding.) The existing reftests that I'm changing from == to != are ones that were specifically testing issues related to erosion of padding. The change to 491180-{1,2}-ref.html is because we now *do* erode the focusPadding, which is 3px in the horizontal dimensions (see the button::-moz-focus-inner styles in forms.css), and that was the only nonzero style on the button in 491180-{1,2}.html.	2015-03-20 06:47:29 -07:00
Phil Ringnalda	0b8d3e9eb3	Back out ceaac3da2eff (bug 1010675) for Android reftest failures ... CLOSED TREE	2015-03-19 22:49:45 -07:00
L. David Baron	f913231fd1	Bug 1010675 - Stop allowing button contents to overflow into the CSS padding and border (although still allow them to overflow into our internal focuspadding when the min-content width says the contents don't fit). r=dholbert ... Note that this replaces the code that allows eroding the space with new code that reduces the focusPadding value. (Also, we previously didn't count the focusPadding towards what could be eroded, which meant we wouldn't quite get to the edge of the padding and border, because we weren't counting the extra for the focusPadding.) The existing reftests that I'm changing from == to != are ones that were specifically testing issues related to erosion of padding. The change to 491180-{1,2}-ref.html is because we now *do* erode the focusPadding, which is 3px in the horizontal dimensions (see the button::-moz-focus-inner styles in forms.css), and that was the only nonzero style on the button in 491180-{1,2}.html.	2015-03-19 21:10:00 -07:00