We're getting crashes because either there's no CycleCollectedJSContext or it
has a null JSContext. Hard to tell which, and whether this is happening
because our runnable comes really early in thread setup or really late in
thread teardown. In either case, this is restoring the null-check that used to
be there in this code.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D43804
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Some worker debugger runnables (the ones that want to evaluate script against a
debugger sandbox) depend on the JSContext being in a particular Realm before
they run, but don't really store which Realm that should be. Instead of
propagating that state via the current Realm of the JSContext across nested
event loops, we want to propagate it explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41790
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If main thread is busy handling runnables in the normal priority queue, control-type of messages from
workers are possibly postponed to run after those. That can lead to bad performance, if the page
expects workers to be able to proceed simultanously with the main thread.
This patch makes the control messages to use medium high priority queue in order to try to
ensure they are handled in timely manner.
Pref dom.worker.use_medium_high_event_queue can be set to false to disable this new behavior.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22128
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 447dec6dbcccaa0206a1815c21ccf713c523fc91
Remove WorkerPrivate::mQueuedRunnables and its associated functions. The
approach they implement can never be correct, as the parent window gets
'resumed' whenever the debugger resumes execution after a breakpoint. The
interrupted JavaScript invocation has not yet completed, so it is not yet time
to run mQueuedRunnables. Simply re-enqueing them at that point can cause
messages from the worker to arrive out of order.
Instead, we create a separate ThrottledEventQueue,
WorkerPrivate::mMainThreadDebuggeeEventTarget especially for
WorkerDebuggeeRunnables, runnables sent from the worker to the main thread that
should not be delivered to a paused or frozen content window. This queue is
paused and resumed by WorkerPrivate::Freeze, WorkerPrivate::Thaw,
WorkerPrivate::ParentWindowPaused, and WorkerPrivate::ParentWindowResumed.
Since this affects when WorkerDebuggeeRunnables are delivered relative to other
administrative worker runnables, WorkerDebuggeeRunnable must use a
ThreadSafeWorkerRef to ensure that the WorkerPrivate sticks around long enough
for them to run properly.
Depends on D9219
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9220
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This was done automatically replacing:
s/mozilla::Move/std::move/
s/ Move(/ std::move(/
s/(Move(/(std::move(/
Removing the 'using mozilla::Move;' lines.
And then with a few manual fixups, see the bug for the split series..
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jxze3adipUh
The change to RootAccessible.cpp fixes an obvious bug introduced in bug 741707.
The visibility changes in gfx/thebes are because NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS has a
trailing "public:" that those classes were relying on to have public
constructors.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IeB8KIJCGhU
This is a large patch which tries to switch many of the external consumers of
nsGlobalWindow to instead use the new Inner or Outer variants.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 99648Lm46T5
This change avoids lots of false positives for Coverity's CHECKED_RETURN
warning, caused by NS_WARN_IF's current use in both statement-style and
expression-style.
In the case where the code within the NS_WARN_IF has side-effects, I made the
following change.
> NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(FunctionWithSideEffects()));
> -->
> Unused << NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(FunctionWithSideEffects()));
In the case where the code within the NS_WARN_IF lacks side-effects, I made the
following change.
> NS_WARN_IF(!condWithoutSideEffects);
> -->
> NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(condWithoutSideEffects, "msg");
This has two improvements.
- The condition is not evaluated in non-debug builds.
- The sense of the condition is inverted to the familiar "this condition should
be true" sense used in assertions.
A common variation on the side-effect-free case is the following.
> nsresult rv = Fn();
> NS_WARN_IF_(NS_FAILED(rv));
> -->
> DebugOnly<nsresult rv> = Fn();
> NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(NS_SUCCEEDED(rv), "Fn failed");
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 58788245021096efa8372a9dc1d597a611d45611
The new name makes the sense of the condition much clearer. E.g. compare:
NS_WARN_IF_FALSE(!rv.Failed());
with:
NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(!rv.Failed());
The new name also makes it clearer that it only has effect in debug builds,
because that's standard for assertions.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 886e57a9e433e0cb6ed635cc075b34b7ebf81853
Boris Zbarsky
Olli Pettay
Sylvestre Ledru
Jim Blandy
Jan de Mooij
Andrea Marchesini
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Nika Layzell
Bill McCloskey
Carsten "Tomcat" Book
Michael Layzell
Ben Kelly
Wes Kocher
Nicholas Nethercote
Iris Hsiao