Raw Cr.ERROR don't get stack information, same as throwing JS literals instead
of `new Error()`s.
This was done automatically with a new eslint rule that will be introduced in
the next commit. One instance of a raw Cr.ERROR was not replaced since it is
used in a test that specifically checks the preservation of raw Cr values in
XPCJS. The rule will be disabled for that instance.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28073
When starting a load via the ParentProcessDocumentChannel, the event http-on-modify-request will be fired before the DocumentLoadListener has a chance to set the notificationCallback attribute.
When using a DocumentChannel, this test will not trigger the expected codepath as the DOMWindowCreated event will be fired once the channel is fully up and running; which in effect is also a fix of the original bug 1339722
Instead we use the document-on-modify-request event when the DocumentChannel is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70011
When starting a load via the ParentProcessDocumentChannel, the event http-on-modify-request will be fired before the DocumentLoadListener has a chance to set the notificationCallback attribute.
When using a DocumentChannel, this test will not trigger the expected codepath as the DOMWindowCreated event will be fired once the channel is fully up and running; which in effect is also a fix of the original bug 1339722
Instead we use the document-on-modify-request event when the DocumentChannel is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70011
When starting a load via the ParentProcessDocumentChannel, the event http-on-modify-request will be fired before the DocumentLoadListener has a chance to set the notificationCallback attribute.
When using a DocumentChannel, this test will not trigger the expected codepath as the DOMWindowCreated event will be fired once the channel is fully up and running; which in effect is also a fix of the original bug 1339722
Instead we use the document-on-modify-request event when the DocumentChannel is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70011
This commit:
- removes sendRpcMessage, which was unused;
- removes the CPOW argument to sendAsyncMessage, broadcastAsyncMessage, and
sendSyncMessage;
- removes the aIsSync argument used internally to distinguish sendRpcMessage
and sendSyncMessage;
- removes CPOW tests;
- updates the few remaining callsites that use more than 2 arguments in
sendAsyncMessage for the removal of the cpows argument.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D71514
When starting a load via the ParentProcessDocumentChannel, the event http-on-modify-request will be fired before the DocumentLoadListener has a chance to set the notificationCallback attribute.
When using a DocumentChannel, this test will not trigger the expected codepath as the DOMWindowCreated event will be fired once the channel is fully up and running; which in effect is also a fix of the original bug 1339722
Instead we use the document-on-modify-request event when the DocumentChannel is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70011
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch adds a lot of `beforeinput` event tests into existing mochitests
which test `input` events. But this does not add tests of canceling
`beforeinput` event because it requires really complicated path until
implementing `beforeinput` actually.
Note that `beforeinput` event is not fired with `Document.execCommand()`.
Therefore, this patch does not add WPT for testing `beforeinput` event.
And unfortunately, WPT cannot test most cases of the new tests.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58123
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch adds a lot of `beforeinput` event tests into existing mochitests
which test `input` events. But this does not add tests of canceling
`beforeinput` event because it requires really complicated path until
implementing `beforeinput` actually.
Note that `beforeinput` event is not fired with `Document.execCommand()`.
Therefore, this patch does not add WPT for testing `beforeinput` event.
And unfortunately, WPT cannot test most cases of the new tests.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58123
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is generally pretty straightforward, and rewrites nearly all calls. It
skips the ones that it can detect using frame script globals like
`sendAsyncMessage`, though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53740
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Sonia Singla
Kris Maglione
Anny Gakhokidze
Dorel Luca
Junior Hsu
Razvan Maries
Ian Moody
sagudev
Jean-Yves Avenard
Csoregi Natalia
Andreea Pavel
Gijs Kruitbosch
Ciure Andrei
Stefan Hindli
Henri Sivonen
Bogdan Tara
Masayuki Nakano
Julian Descottes
Johann Hofmann