`= {}` can now be used to indicate that an optional dictionary should have the
default value of 'default-initialized dictionary'
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36504
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`= {}` can now be used to indicate that an optional dictionary should have the
default value of 'default-initialized dictionary'
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36504
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`= {}` can now be used to indicate that an optional dictionary should have the
default value of 'default-initialized dictionary'
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36504
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The bounds attribute has been deprecated and shown zero use, and thus this change removes it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36005
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch was generated by my modeline.py script.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EbVjPLwiUAT
Depends on D4159
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D4161
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I've made the returned object from .bounds not live. If that's not OK, I'll
resurrect DOMBounds (removed in a previous patch). This also forces
DOMQuad.toJSON() to only return the points.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 10TY5oJUmTN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f965bd0593b512ec57ffc5268eecf3b4fe8e820a
Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec.
Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make
css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous
patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the
way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why
the harness was falling over.
The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now
that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid
wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's
should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its
points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting
the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never
update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch
(and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug
to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended
the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the
DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice.
I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly
class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them
public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly
version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make
them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 44489693afebff571a415b487e29fa6153288421
I've made the returned object from .bounds not live. If that's not OK, I'll
resurrect DOMBounds (removed in a previous patch). This also forces
DOMQuad.toJSON() to only return the points.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 10TY5oJUmTN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ab209d584390c584aa0d0814b4dd2bbf48c6cca3
Some notes: this does not fully bring us to compliance to the current spec.
Instead, these are the fixes that I needed to make in order to make
css/geometry/interfaces.html pass with the DOMPoint changes in the previous
patches. I don't fully understand why that patch caused the test to fail the
way it did, but it ended up being easier to fix our code than understand why
the harness was falling over.
The DOMQuad::QuadBounds class was the source of some confusion for me. Now
that DOMRectReadOnly is a concrete class with members, I wanted to avoid
wasting them. However, the spec is unclear as to whether a DOMQuad's bound's
should be live -- that is because DOMQuad exposes DOMPoint, we can set its
points after retrieving a QuadBounds object. Our current code is live, setting
the points changes the QuadBounds. Chromium's current behavior is to never
update the QuadBounds object. I've left our behavior untouched in this patch
(and waste 4 doubles per QuadBounds object), but I am intending to file a bug
to understand what the intent of the spec is. I wonder if the author intended
the points to be DOMPointReadOnly instead. If so, we could simplify the
DOMRectReadOnly code and get rid of the virtual getters, which would be nice.
I also wasn't thrilled to put the DOMMatrix setters on the DOMMatrixReadOnly
class, but for brevity and simplicity of implementation, I've made them
public. I briefly considered making the setters protected on the ReadOnly
version of the class, but I'm not convinced that having to explicitly make
them public on the derived class is worth the extra copies of the names.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CjdW4Nbnc6A
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 97e9386cfb17319242913d28117c8b1b8b6fbbbe
Boris Zbarsky
Cosmin Sabou
Mihai Alexandru Michis
Kagami Sascha Rosylight
Andrew McCreight
Blake Kaplan
Narcis Beleuzu
Robert O'Callahan
Ryan VanderMeulen
Carsten "Tomcat" Book