HSTS priming changes the order of mixed-content blocking and HSTS
upgrades, and adds a priming request to check if a mixed-content load is
accesible over HTTPS and the server supports upgrading via the
Strict-Transport-Security header.
Every call site that uses AsyncOpen2 passes through the mixed-content
blocker, and has a LoadInfo. If the mixed-content blocker marks the load as
needing HSTS priming, nsHttpChannel will build and send an HSTS priming
request on the same URI with the scheme upgraded to HTTPS. If the server
allows the upgrade, then channel performs an internal redirect to the HTTPS URI,
otherwise use the result of mixed-content blocker to allow or block the
load.
nsISiteSecurityService adds an optional boolean out parameter to
determine if the HSTS state is already cached for negative assertions.
If the host has been probed within the previous 24 hours, no HSTS
priming check will be sent.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ES1JruCtDdX
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2ac6c93c49f2862fc0b9e595eb0598cd1ea4bedf
* Add PAltDataOutputStream.ipdl to be able to open an OutputStream to the cache entry in the child process
* AltDataOutputStreamChild/Parent are Main Thread only for now.
* Adds methods for reading and writing alt-data to nsICacheInfoChannel.idl
* Keep a ref of the cache entry after OnStopRequest in case the consumer tries to open the alt-data output stream
MozReview-Commit-ID: jlraDI97Hg
The functions aren't necessary now that we have BitwiseCast.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2nzOuwAop4Y
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0cb2c16f484a81b2e77384564973b58ac2d10fb9
The functions aren't necessary now that we have BitwiseCast.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2nzOuwAop4Y
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 196449249eec75b8eb10e59662231c3f4e83c268
This change avoids lots of false positives for Coverity's CHECKED_RETURN
warning, caused by NS_WARN_IF's current use in both statement-style and
expression-style.
In the case where the code within the NS_WARN_IF has side-effects, I made the
following change.
> NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(FunctionWithSideEffects()));
> -->
> Unused << NS_WARN_IF(NS_FAILED(FunctionWithSideEffects()));
In the case where the code within the NS_WARN_IF lacks side-effects, I made the
following change.
> NS_WARN_IF(!condWithoutSideEffects);
> -->
> NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(condWithoutSideEffects, "msg");
This has two improvements.
- The condition is not evaluated in non-debug builds.
- The sense of the condition is inverted to the familiar "this condition should
be true" sense used in assertions.
A common variation on the side-effect-free case is the following.
> nsresult rv = Fn();
> NS_WARN_IF_(NS_FAILED(rv));
> -->
> DebugOnly<nsresult rv> = Fn();
> NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(NS_SUCCEEDED(rv), "Fn failed");
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 58788245021096efa8372a9dc1d597a611d45611
The new name makes the sense of the condition much clearer. E.g. compare:
NS_WARN_IF_FALSE(!rv.Failed());
with:
NS_WARNING_ASSERTION(!rv.Failed());
The new name also makes it clearer that it only has effect in debug builds,
because that's standard for assertions.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 886e57a9e433e0cb6ed635cc075b34b7ebf81853
This function is an infallible alternative to nsIURI::GetSpec(). It's useful
when it's appropriate to handle a GetSpec() failure with a failure string, e.g.
for log/warning/error messages. It allows code like this:
nsAutoCString spec;
uri->GetSpec(spec);
printf("uri: %s", spec.get());
to be changed to this:
printf("uri: %s", uri->GetSpecOrDefault().get());
This introduces a slight behavioural change. Previously, if GetSpec() failed,
an empty string would be used here. Now, "[nsIURI::GetSpec failed]" will be
produced instead. In most cases this failure string will make for a clearer
log/warning/error message than the empty string.
* * *
Bug 1297961 (part 1b) - More GetSpecOrDefault() additions. r=hurley.
I will fold this into part 1 before landing.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ddc19a5624354ac098be019ca13cc24b99b80ddc