It's always work with `Selection` ranges. Then, it should be treated within
`AutoRangeArray` which can be initialized with `Selection` ranges automatically.
Then, we can making `HTMLEditor` simpler.
Note tha this tries to make it get editing host when the corresponding
public method is called (after dispatched `beforeinput` event if handling a
users' operation). However, as commented in
`HTMLEditor::SetParagraphFormatAsAction`, it breaks a tricky crash test.
Therefore, only the format block path computes it after the preparation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D149079
It's currently computes the corresponding editing host from the focus node of
`Selection` with climbing up the DOM tree. So, it does not just return a stored
element. Therefore, some callers use it multiple times. For avoiding it, we
should rename it to explain that it computes the editing host.
Note that I think that we should make it takes a node to compute editing host
without `Selection` for solving the case of no selection ranges. Therefore,
I don't like to include more information into the name.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D147504
It returns the anonymous `<div>` element if the instance is a `TextEditor`, and
compute editing host otherwise. So it's unclear what it returns. Additionally,
all users except `EditorBase::CreateTransactionForCollapsedRange` are the
methods of `HTMLEditor`. Therefore, we should remove it and unwrap the code
which it's done.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D147503
None of the consumer need to mutate styles, and this saves some ugly
const_casting on the next patch.
Doesn't change behavior.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D147555
At initializing new element which has not been connected, undo transactions
are not necessary because just removing the new element gets same result for
users. Therefore, they should be able to work without transactions.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D140468
This will make implementing the new behavior behind a pref
really straight-forward, and is generally nicer.
Depends on D121858
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D121705
The testcase hits the assertion because `CreateNodeTransaction::DoTransaction()`
returns error, but it's not handled by `HandledInsertParagraphInParagraph()`
so that we should make `InsertBRElementWithTransaction()` and its callees
should return error if they meet unexpected cases.
Depends on D113471
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D113472
When the grabber to move absolutely positioned element is disabled,
`HTMLEditor::HideGrabberInternal()` is called to delete it. However,
it does not reset dragging state. Therefore, `mousemove` event listener
will try to handle drag even after the grabber is removed.
This patch makes `HideGrabberInternal()` reset the dragging state to
make the event listener stop handling the drag action.
However, I hit a buggy assertion in `EventStateManager`. It tries to
set active state to parent of the grabber (in this case, absolutely positioned
element). However, editable element in `contenteditable` cannot have
active state. Therefore, `leaf` becomes `nullptr`, but `newleaf` is the
absolutely positioned element. Therefore, this patch adds this condition
into the `MOZ_ASSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D93632
Although we use CSS property for Inline table editing UI, we use edit
transaction for it unfortunately. When hiding this UI, since removing
element doesn't use edit transaction, transaction will be canceled before
showing this UI.
It is unnecessary to use edit transaction for UI, so we shouldn't use it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D90056
The editor modules does QI too many times when it sets or removes some style
with `execCommand` or XPCOM API. Therefore, there should be an API to
retrieve `nsStyledElement` pointer from `nsINode*`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D87990
The root cause of this bug is a bug of async `ScrollSelectionIntoView` that
is what it won't be canceled even if web app changes scroll position with
any API. Fixing it is really risky and this bug affects an existing website.
Therefore, this patch makes the constructors of `AutoPlaceholderBatch` take
whether do or do not `ScrollSelectionIntoView` when it's destructed. And
makes `HTMLEditor::SetInlinePropertyAsAction()` not request
`ScrollSelectionIntoView` for taking back the traditional behavior.
Note that this patch does not make it an optional argument because it's hard to
guess that it'll run `ScrollSelectionIntoView` automatically.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D87819
When it refers computed value of style, it may flush pending notifications.
Therefore, they should be marked as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70151
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When it refers computed value of style, it may flush pending notifications.
Therefore, they should be marked as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70151
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The inclusions were removed with the following very crude script and the
resulting breakage was fixed up by hand. The manual fixups did either
revert the changes done by the script, replace a generic header with a more
specific one or replace a header with a forward declaration.
find . -name "*.idl" | grep -v web-platform | grep -v third_party | while read path; do
interfaces=$(grep "^\(class\|interface\).*:.*" "$path" | cut -d' ' -f2)
if [ -n "$interfaces" ]; then
if [[ "$interfaces" == *$'\n'* ]]; then
regexp="\("
for i in $interfaces; do regexp="$regexp$i\|"; done
regexp="${regexp%%\\\|}\)"
else
regexp="$interfaces"
fi
interface=$(basename "$path")
rg -l "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" . | while read path2; do
hits=$(grep -v "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" "$path2" | grep -c "$regexp" )
if [ $hits -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Removing ${interface} from ${path2}"
grep -v "#include.*${interface%%.idl}.h" "$path2" > "$path2".tmp
mv -f "$path2".tmp "$path2"
fi
done
fi
done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D55443
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Surprisingly, its `aChildOnly` is never set to `true` and if it were set to
`true`, it does unnecessary recursive calls. Therefore, we can make it
simpler.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47860
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Now, we can get rid of `TextEditRules` and `HTMLEditRules` completely.
And also this patch renames their cpp files to `TextEditSubActionHandler`
and `HTMLEditSubActionHandler`.
`TextEditor::Init()` and `HTMLEditor::Init()` are still complicated due to
`AutoEditInitRulesTrigger`. The following patch will remove it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45792
--HG--
rename : editor/libeditor/HTMLEditRules.cpp => editor/libeditor/HTMLEditSubActionHandler.cpp
rename : editor/libeditor/TextEditRules.cpp => editor/libeditor/TextEditSubActionHandler.cpp
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Oddly, absolute position is handled as following steps.
1. `WillAbsolutePosition()` calls `PrepareToMakeElementAbsolutePosition()`
to consider the target element.
2. Set TopLevelEditSubActionData::mNewBlockElement to it.
3. `DidAbsolutePosition()` makes it absolute-positioned.
So that, all of them can be done in `WillAbsolutePosition()` like other
edit sub-action handling.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45290
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`HTMLEditRules::MakeSureElemStartsOrEndsOnCR()` is unclear what it does.
And fortunately, its job is simple if we split it to each mode. Therefore,
this patch splits it to `EnsureHardLineBeginsWithFirstChildOf()` and
`EnsureHardLineEndsWithLastChildOf()`. Finally, the batch caller of them,
`HTMLEditRules::MakeSureElemStartsAndEndsOnCR()` is removed since directly
calling both of them is clearer.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44787
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The members of `HTMLEditRules` which are used only while `WillDoAction()` and
`DidDoAction()` are called should be moved to specific stack only struct
`EditorBase::EditSubActionData`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D42106
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Stopping using attribute for "moz-br", `IMEContentObserver` cannot know when
new `<br>` element is changed to padding element for empty last line.
Therefore, editor needs to insert padding `<br>` element after setting the
flag properly. Then, `IMEContentObserver` does not need to recompute the
length of `<br>` element (if it's for padding, it computes the length as 0).
Unfortunately, `TextEditor::InsertBrElementWithTransaction()` is used in too
many places and it already has optional argument. Therefore, it's difficult
to change it. However, we should share the preparation before creating `<br>`
element in it with new method. Therefore, this patch creates
`EditorBase::PrepareToInsertBRElement()` to share the preparation point (almost
just moved from the method). Then, new method is created as
`EditorBase::InsertPaddingBRElementForEmptyLastLineWithTransaction()` because
it's used both in `TextEditor` and `HTMLEditor`. Finally, `TextEditor` won't
insert `<br>` element with `InsertBrElementWithTransaction()`. Therefore, it's
moved to `HTMLEditor` with renaming to `InsertBRElementWithTransaction()`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39860
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`Document::ExecCommand()` knows subject principal. This patch makes it tell
`EditorCommand::DoCommand()` and `EditorCommand::DoCommandParam()`. Then,
makes they tell each editor public methods which may cause dispatching
`beforeinput` event once we implement it. Finally, each editor public
method sets it to the constructor of `EditorBase::AutoEditActionDataSetter`.
This means that when editor tries to dispatch `beforeinput` event, editor
can check whether it's called by JS or not from everywhere.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29635
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I think this is a good change regardless of other discussion in bug 1552587. If
we decide to move `mColor` to the top-level of the struct that can be done
separately.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32726
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`nsIDocumentStateListener` is a scriptable interface and each method may run
any script. So, we should mark them as `can_run_script`. Then, we need to
mark a lot of editing methods because we need to mark
`EditorBase::EndTransactionInternal()` and `EditorBase::DoTransactionInternal()`
as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30360
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It'd be better to change copy constructor of `EditorDOMPointBase` to explicit,
but it'd require too many changes in editor code. So, this patch just changes
each method callers only.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30054
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Masayuki Nakano
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Kagami Sascha Rosylight
Andi-Bogdan Postelnicu
Simon Giesecke
Makoto Kato
Olli Pettay
Bogdan Tara
Razvan Maries
Gabriele Svelto
Mirko Brodesser
Sylvestre Ledru