Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
Make the WindowProxyHolder hold a strong reference to a BrowsingContext, as in the future
we might not have a nsPIDOMWindowOuter (if the document is loaded in a different process).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12651
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If class A is derived from class B, then an instance of class A can be
converted to B via a static cast, so a slower QI is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6861
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This changes the fingerprint resistance code to set mIgnoreXULSize and
mIgnoreXULSizeMode even when there isn't yet a primary content container,
if this is a browser window.
It also removes some dead code and reorders some other logic wrt
mIgnoreXULSizeMode to make it more obvious what that code is doing, and
renames the containing method to distinguish it more clearly from some
other Load...Attributes methods.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LJqRWeta6XV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9d83c83aa2ee8d3314e3f94f157b956608e927d8
Add an anonymous XUL tooltip node to toplevel non-XUL windows. Setup a
nsXULTooltipListener on non-XUL nsXULWindows. Make nsXULTooltipListener
always use the default tooltip in the non-XUL case.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Koe5m8PwMQM
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 242180e957758b51c589452e35deadac5ab06d9e
Previously, with early first paint enabled, nsXULWindow incorrectly loaded the
persisted window settings from about:blank and would only load them once.
Instead, load the settings before starting layout.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6K4ofkbmHHb
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7bcd804cfabbd47ee5a747800a2ef81852213889
This should allow us to figure out what's killing the window mid-flight, in case
there's something to fix in the chrome JS code.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1xx1AVdspB2
Using concrete class types with static IIDs in QueryInterface methods is a
pretty common pattern which isn't supported by any existing helper macros.
That's lead to separate ad-hoc implementations, with varying degrees of
dodginess, being scattered around the tree.
This patch adds a helper macro with a canonical (and safe) implementation, and
updates existing ad-hoc users to use it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HaTGF7MN5Cv
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ace930129d85960d22bc3048ca3bb19bbbd4a63e
extra : histedit_source : 03a87f746d957789d41381e4e1bfcc4fd7eebaf2%2C9c5bae9feeeef7721105db67be0f83e0ded66bb7
Move tracking of persistent window state into nsXULWindow. Also, move
special handling of the width/height of the window into nsXULWindow.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LOmHGyYeNSU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bcea16eb6209ff789948644a64968a7325cea4ef
When SetSize etc. are called before OnChromeLoaded has been invoked,
the functions assume that the window initialization code wants to size
the window specifically, and thus ignore the values from the <window>
element.
However, bug 1439875 changes the behavior so that SizeShell is also
invoked before OnChromeLoaded, which confuses the functions above, and
causes some of the attributes not to be loaded properly.
This patch adds a separate flag to avoid ignoring those attributes when
those functions are invoked as part of SizeShell itself.
It can cause extra reflow if the window is opened in maximized state,
and thus the new whitelist items. They may be fixed by bug 1448199.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7jT8w9KGmzy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d970be5b1ae0588f6b0b63e2bd6a711853c82478
I want this behind a pref so that I can investigate other bugs without building
locally.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FWbGUxNbbm
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 546ace867858f17b543bd11ef908c10fa63a022f
When SetSize etc. are called before OnChromeLoaded has been invoked,
the functions assume that the window initialization code wants to size
the window specifically, and thus ignore the values from the <window>
element.
However, bug 1439875 changes the behavior so that SizeShell is also
invoked before OnChromeLoaded, which confuses the functions above, and
causes some of the attributes not to be loaded properly.
This patch adds a separate flag to avoid ignoring those attributes when
those functions are invoked as part of SizeShell itself.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7jT8w9KGmzy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7bcc0b1fe96207561fbfd255c976cce695c1da8f
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8ad309e3f449cea1536bfbff8e8b1585fefbc186
extra : source : f582644f846cee16b554d694d24b4eb8ca3c5106
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
It seems that the layout system assumes those attributes are for size of
the <window> element, i.e. inner window size, not outer window size.
See for example nsContainerFrame::SyncWindowProperties. It reads
{min,max}{width,height} attributes from the element via
nsIFrame::GetXUL{Min,Max}Size, and passes them into SetSizeConstraints.
The latter inflates the sizes with window decoration size before calling
into widget code. It can also be seen that various XUL size related
methods on nsBox and nsIFrame put the same assumption.
The test test_windowminmaxsize.xul apparently puts the same assumption
as the layout system on the meaning of those properties.
(Another test test_resize_move_windows.xul, which tests effectiveness of
features of window.open, also fails if we size the window earlier than
current in bug 1439875, and doesn't fail with this patch on top. It may
indicate that it makes use of the same assumption, but I can't really
figure out how it does so.)
MozReview-Commit-ID: IdMwDc59Ltg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ae46c23e450f556cc4608b512890c4e27cf8623e
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Peter Van der Beken
Sylvestre Ledru
Andrew McCreight
Gijs Kruitbosch
Brian Grinstead
Brendan Dahl
Mike Conley
Kris Maglione
Adrian Wielgosik
Boris Zbarsky
Xidorn Quan
Henri Sivonen
Narcis Beleuzu
Andreea Pavel
Coroiu Cristina
Gurzau Raul
Florian Quèze
Cosmin Sabou
Milan Sreckovic
Cameron McCormack
Nika Layzell