Граф коммитов

11 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Kyle Huey 0c33e75160 Bug 788999: Disable the test on Mountain Lion. 2013-03-13 09:40:55 -07:00
Matthew Schranz 5e505cd07f Bug 725289 - Removed moz prefix in Blob.mozSlice. r=sicking
--HG--
rename : dom/workers/test/fileReadMozSlice_worker.js => dom/workers/test/fileReadSlice_worker.js
rename : dom/workers/test/fileMozSlice_worker.js => dom/workers/test/fileSlice_worker.js
rename : dom/workers/test/test_fileReadMozSlice.xul => dom/workers/test/test_fileReadSlice.xul
rename : dom/workers/test/test_fileMozSlice.xul => dom/workers/test/test_fileSlice.xul
2012-02-16 11:22:25 +01:00
Matt Woodrow db33b0ef0e Bug 718334 - Fix some tests to make them work with Skia. r=roc 2012-01-23 14:08:17 +13:00
Malini Das ee09d54d6f Bug 367393 - Add a packed MochiKit that contains only SimpleTest dependencies- plain 1/1. r=jmaher, a=test-only 2011-08-12 12:21:42 -04:00
Kyle Huey 27d8e6cbb0 Bug 648997: Implement BlobBuilder spec as MozBlobBuilder. r=sicking.
Note that there is one key difference between this implementation and the spec.  In this patch MozBlobBuilder.getBlob("content/type"); returns a Blob and clears the MozBlobBuilder.  In the spec the BlobBuilder is not cleared.  Thus,

let bb = new MozBlobBuilder();
MozBlobBuilder.append("foo");
let blob1 = MozBlobBuilder.getBlob("content/type");
// blob1 contains "foo"
MozBlobBuilder.append("bar");
let blob2 = MozBlobBuilder.getBlob("content/type");
// blob2 contains "bar", the spec says it should contain "foobar".

IMO, the spec behavior optimizes for the wrong case.  BlobBuilder will probably be used mostly as a one-shot API.  Additionally, the spec requires the BlobBuilder to hang on to potentially large amounts of memory between the getBlob() call and when the BlobBuilder is GCd.

These issues have been raised on the listserv.
2011-05-20 10:18:45 -07:00
Kyle Huey 18e6d04d41 Backed out changeset b8404a1d3153 2011-05-20 17:00:13 -07:00
Kyle Huey c8f3d0d068 Bug 648997: Implement BlobBuilder spec as mozBlobBuilder. r=sicking.
Note that there is one key difference between this implementation and the spec.  In this patch mozBlobBuilder.getBlob("content/type"); returns a Blob and clears the mozBlobBuilder.  In the spec the BlobBuilder is not cleared.  Thus,

let bb = new mozBlobBuilder();
mozBlobBuilder.append("foo");
let blob1 = mozBlobBuilder.getBlob("content/type");
// blob1 contains "foo"
mozBlobBuilder.append("bar");
let blob2 = mozBlobBuilder.getBlob("content/type");
// blob2 contains "bar", the spec says it should contain "foobar".

IMO, the spec behavior optimizes for the wrong case.  BlobBuilder will probably be used mostly as a one-shot API.  Additionally, the spec requires the BlobBuilder to hang on to potentially large amounts of memory between the getBlob() call and when the BlobBuilder is GCd.

These issues have been raised on the listserv.
2011-05-20 10:18:45 -07:00
Jonas Sicking 3815106388 Bug 649672: Make File.slice arguments match Array.slice and prefix File.slice. r=khuey 2011-04-13 14:34:36 -07:00
Serge Gautherie 48464bae5d Bug 621414 - mochitests-1: test_fileapi_slice.html logs 12 _very_ (too) long lines; (Av1a) Better differentiate check logs, Stop generating raw-binary and/or over-long log lines.
rs=jonas a=(test only).
2011-01-05 12:35:55 +01:00
Jonas Sicking abf5fa5994 Bug 609030: Update createBlobURL/revokeBlobURL to it's final name. r=jst a=blocker 2010-11-23 00:50:55 -08:00
Jonas Sicking 1dee38609c Bug 575946: Implement File.slice. r=khuey sr=biesi a=beltzner 2010-10-13 16:25:33 -07:00