This is split from the previous changeset since if we include dom/ the file size is too
large for phabricator to handle.
This is an autogenerated commit to handle scripts loading mochitest harness files, in
the simple case where the script src is on the same line as the tag.
This was generated with https://bug1544322.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=9058170
using the `--part 2` argument.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27457
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Disabled plugin related tests.
Added `crashreporter` dependency for browser_restore_isAppTab.js.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25504
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If user disables clipboard events, it means that they don't want to expose
clipboard data to web apps even if web apps cannot handle "paste" operation.
Therefore, they must not want to leak clipboard data with `InputEvent.data`
and `InputEvent.dataTransfer`.
This patch makes `InputEvent::GetData()` and `InputEvent::GetDataTransfer()`
returns empty string or new `DataTransfer` object which has only empty string
if:
- They are called by content JS.
- The event is a trusted event.
- `inputType` value is `insertFromPaste` or `insertFromPasteAsQuotation`.
The reason why we don't return null for both is, Input Events spec declares
`data` or `dataTransfer` shouldn't be null in the `inputType` values. And
the reason why we don't return empty `DataTransfer` is, web apps may expect
at least one data is stored in non-null `dataTransfer` value.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25350
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Per the thread "Intent-to-Ship: Backward-Compatibility FIDO U2F support for
Google Accounts" on dev-platform [0], this bug is to:
1. Enable the security.webauth.u2f by default, to ride the trains
2. Remove the aOp == U2FOperation::Sign check from EvaluateAppID in
WebAuthnUtil.cpp, permitting the Google override to work for Register as
well as Sign.
This would enable Firefox users to use FIDO U2F API on most all sites, subject
to the algorithm limitations discussed in the section "Thorny issues in
enabling our FIDO U2F API implementation" of that post.
[0] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/q5cj38hGTEA/lC834665BQAJ
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25241
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
1. If an object needs a custom function to |write|, it will be added to |memory|
in |JSStructuredCloneWriter| before calling the custom function. But in
JSStructuredCloneReader::startRead we did the opposite. This will cause
out-of-order if the custom function also writes some objects (e.g.
WriteStructuredCloneImageData). We fix this by keeping the same order in
|startRead|.
2. |JS_WriteTypedArray| should not call |writeTypedArray| directly, because it
will miss an entry in |memory| for the typed array itself. We fix this by calling
|startWrite| instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24670
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Let's skip all these sw_reroute tests temporarily, while we continue investigating,
so that fewer failures are reported and fewer alerts/needinfos are generated!
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25159
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Looks like these three APIs slipped through when shipping v1, but no other
vendor supports them, so no reason to be here.
I don't think there's any harm in letting the implementations keep living in
DocumentOrShadowRoot, but let me know if you think otherwise and I'll move them
to Document.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23577
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
You can mess up stuff pretty badly if that happens, and we want to do this
anyway for the shared UA sheet stuff, so...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22554
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The main behavior changes are:
1) We no longer create a new Window when doing document.open(). We use the
same Window but remove all the event listeners on it and on the existing DOM
tree before removing the document's existing kids.
2) We no longer create a new session history entry. The existing one always
gets replaced instead.
3) We now support document.open on documents that are not in a Window.
The reasons for the various test changes are as follows:
The change to browser_modifiedclick_inherit_principal.js is because we no
longer set the docshell to a wyciwyg URL when document.open() happens and the
test was depending on that to terminate.
browser_wyciwyg_urlbarCopying.js is being removed because it's trying to test
wyciwyg URIs, which no longer exist.
The changes in docshell/test/navigation are because document.open() no longer
affects session history. One of the tests was testing the interactions there
and is being removed; another is being repurposed to just test that
document.open() does not affect history.length.
The change to test_x-frame-options.html is because document.open() now removes
event listeners on the window, which it didn't use to do (and in the specific
case in this test reused the existing inner too, so the listener was still
around in practice). The new behavior matches other browsers.
The removal of test_bug172261.html is because document.open() no longer affects
session history, so you can't go back across it or forward to the "opened"
state, so the situation that test is trying to test no longer exists.
The changes to test_bug255820.html are because reloading a document after
document.open() will now just load the URL of the document that was the entry
document for the open() call, not reload the written content. So there's not
much point testing reload behavior, and in this test it was just reloading the
toplevel test file inside the frames.
The change to test_bug346659.html is because now we no longer create a new
Window on document.open().
The change to test_bug1232829.html is because document.open() (implicit in this
test) no longer adds history entries, so the back() was just leaving the test
page instead of going back across the document.open(). The test is a
crashtest in practice, so might still be testing something useful about how
document.open() interacts with animations.
The change to test_bug715739.html is because the URL of the document after
document.open() is now the URL of the entry document, not a wyciwyg URL, so
reload() has different behavior than it used to.
The change to test_bug329869.html is because now when we go back we're
reloading the original document we had, not doing a wyciwyg load, and the
security info now doesn't include the untrusted script.
The changes to the wpt expectations are removing a bunch of expected failures
now that we pass those tests and disabling some tests that are fundamentally
racy and hence fail randomly. The latter all have github issues filed for the
test problem.
The change to testing/web-platform/tests/common/object-association.js is fixing
tests that were not matching the spec (and were failing in other browsers).
The change to parser-uses-registry-of-owner-document.html is fixing tests that
were not matching the spec (and were failing in other browsers).
The change to document-write.tentative.html is because the test was buggy: it
was using the same iframe element for all its tests and racing loads from some
tests against API calls from other tests, etc. It's a wonder it ever managed
to pass, independent of these patches (and in fact it doesn't pass according to
wpt.fyi data, even in Firefox).
The changes in html/browsers/history/the-history-interface are because
document.open() no longer adds history entries. The test was failing in all
other browsers for the same reason.
The changes in html/browsers/history/the-location-interface are because
reloading a document.open()-created thing now loads the URL of the page that
was the entry document for the open() call. The test was failing in all other
browsers.
The change to reload_document_open_write.html is because we now reload the url
of the document that entered the script that called open() when we reload, not
the written content. Other browsers were failing this test too; Gecko with
the old document.open implementation was the only one that passed.
The change to http-refresh.py is to fix a test bug: it was not returning a
Content-Type header, so we were putting up helper app dialogs, etc.
The change to test_ext_contentscript.js is because we no create a new global
for document.open() calls. Kris Maglione OKed this part.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17323
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
There are few things that are either Fennec-specific or don't work
currently under GeckoView w/ e10s under TestRunnerActivity. Disable
these so we can get some testing going in automation.
This also replaces 'isFennec' with the more correct 'is_fennec'.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19016
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Brian Grinstead
Mike Conley
Csoregi Natalia
Marco Bonardo
Léo Paquet
Will Hawkins
Andreea Pavel
Robin Templeton
Noemi Erli
Edwin Gao
Masayuki Nakano
Cosmin Sabou
J.C. Jones
violet
Geoff Brown
Mark Banner
Andy Wingo
Sebastian Hengst
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Dorel Luca
Andrea Marchesini
Jan Varga
Boris Zbarsky
Brian Hackett
Neil Deakin
Ciure Andrei
James Willcox
Gurzau Raul
arthur.iakab