WebRender is an experimental GPU accelerated rendering backend for Servo.
The WebRender backend can be specified by running Servo with the -w option (otherwise the default rendering backend will be used).
WebRender has many bugs, and missing features - but it is usable to browse most websites - please report any WebRender specific rendering bugs you encounter!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ab07b06823ea9748a6091aee2281495f86f00bce
--HG--
rename : servo/tests/unit/net_traits/lib.rs => servo/resources/shaders/clear.fs.glsl
rename : servo/tests/unit/net_traits/lib.rs => servo/resources/shaders/debug_color.fs.glsl
rename : servo/tests/unit/net_traits/lib.rs => servo/resources/shaders/mask.fs.glsl
Was done while implementing sequence arguments.
Depends on #9056.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c13e84010d1dd33c5532cdfa2937dddd4db4dd26
The core feature is marked as stable and gives this nice warning:
```
servo/components/canvas_traits/lib.rs:7:12: 7:16 warning: this feature is stable. attribute no longer needed, #[warn(stable_features)] on by default
/servo/components/canvas_traits/lib.rs:7 #![feature(core)]
```
This commit removes the usage of this feature.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 996c0a60b81e7d7e0fbfea81a546771ea9327df6
Depends on servo/rust-azure#201 and pcwalton/ipc-channel#10.
Closes#7422.
r? @mbrubeck (don't r+ until the upstream dependencies have landed)
cc @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e2048d57c4c0602c5a6b82db8cb76e6c3e5467fa
This is a direct extract from my abandoned PR for a lint (#7546), along with some rather clumsy modifications (only on `components/script/dom/mod.rs` and `components/style/lib.rs`), because I had to sort some of the files again to make peace with tidy, which hasn't been educated about sorting yet!
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a7208869f2903e36f9b2f540b55b50283d7df466
Since it probably won't merge until multiprocess lands, I plan to use this PR to keep improving WebGL support until it can land.
Main TODOs are integration of tests, since it seems https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/issues/1105 is going nowhere, adding missing calls and proper painting via native surfaces instead of readback.
I can't resolve conflicts right now because of time but I will do it soon.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a109a333f1f95d4fc677b29e3613b2615514c080
Expands on the work by @wilmoz and cleans up the existing errors. Closes#7180. Closes#7111.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e74825f9fde8e222f4ba9bb24b2c2a3864c73e5f
Also adds HeapSizeOf implementations/derive for some types. I've used "Cannot calculate Heap size" as a reason everywhere, because my imagination is rather limited. If you'd like me to change this message for specific types, please write something like this: "Trusted - Cannot calculate Heap size for Trusted" so that it would be easier for me to replace them through a script :)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a03616f379c255cc6c9b6e1d04dd7d98bd9926ce
To actually make the multiprocess communication work, we'll need to
reroute the task creation to the pipeline or the compositor. But this
works as a first step.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1764267379a00b96a1df89f3917299a0c6fd325c
The idea here is to land this before making images and canvas IPC-safe,
because this will shake out bugs relating to the shared memory. There
are currently test timeouts that are preventing multiprocess images and
canvas from landing, and I believe those are due to the inefficiency of
sending large amounts of data in the unoptimized builds we test with. By
moving to shared memory, this should drastically reduce the number of
copies and `serde` serialization.
Under the hood, this uses Mach OOL messages on Mac and temporary
memory-mapped files on Linux.
r? @jdm
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ed1b6a3513e7546b580693f554a081bc0c7c478a
This improves the encapsulation and consistency in our WebGL
implementation.
Also allows to implement new methods such as `getShaderSource()`.
It will also allow us to use `delete()` in the destructors of them (note
that we will probably want to keep track of them from the context before).
Some concerns:
**Trait method repetition**:
I'm aware that the traits `WebGL{Buffer,Renderbuffer,Framebuffer,Texture}Helpers` are basically the same, but `delete()` and `id()` methods are everywhere. I've thought something like:
```rust
pub trait WebGLIdentifiable {
type WebGLId; // id is sometimes i32 (see WebGLUniformLocation)
fn id(&self) -> Self::WebGLId;
}
pub trait WebGLBindable {
fn bind(&self);
}
pub trait WebGLDeletable {
fn delete(&self);
}
```
But I'd want to know your opinion first.
**`renderer` repetition**:
Thought of moving the field: `renderer: Sender<CanvasMsg>` to `WebGLObject`, but I think it makes it way more complicated to read, and also a bit unnecessary, at least IMO (`WebGLObject` will never interact with the field directly). It would also mean that all `WebGLObject`s should have one, which is true at this moment, but maybe not with WebGL 2, for example.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0f8095b950dd144497919cfea65a1f154ed3ae9a
Sorry for not doing it yesterday, I couldn't.
cc @metajack @SimonSapin
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 4ebb95ccd8e034007eacb447a054919ef4af2bf7
It seems @hyowon uploaded her canvas shadow patch faster than me; I've handled the color dependency a bit different, this way `gfx_traits` is not required by the script module.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c8c7bd900dde73d4fddafea8239f44440f1c863b
The first step of the implementation for shadows in canvas.
r? @nox @jdm
cc @yichoi
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: f163f2bf0d32861ea20470d405bb517ed5b09e84
This commit implements:
* WebGLFramebuffer
* WebGLRenderbuffer
* WebGLTexture
And adds the following methods to `WebGLRenderingContext`:
* create{Texture,Framebuffer,Renderbuffer}
* bind{Texture,Framebuffer,Renderbuffer}
* destroy{Buffer,Texture,Framebuffer,Renderbuffer}
Fixes:
* WebGLUniform location shouldn't inherit from WebGLObject.
Known Issues:
* WebGL objects have to be destroyed on drop, we may want to keep a reference to the context, or maybe a clone of the renderer to achieve this
Also refactors a huge part of the current implementation, to allow
failing on creation of different WebGL objects.
Blocked on https://github.com/servo/gleam/pull/22
A reftest for most of the added functionality is not doable right now,
we need a few more functions in order to upload a texture, for example.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e09c555a41b0803388e54013ac8885fb789a0fa6
This implements the `canvas`, `drawingBufferHeight` and `drawingBufferWidth` getters to `WebGLRenderingContext`, and an initial version of `getParameter`.
r? @jdm or @nox?
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 042737793b1995ad93dc093ea12ec986b99e64b8
r? @jdm
I couldn't add the `getContextAttributes` method since `CodegenRust`
doesn't know how to return a dictionary value, I'll take a look at it ASAP.
I think the helper functions can return directly the renderer, since they're used just for that, but I wanted to hear your opinions about this.
By the way I'm interested in adding more serious tests for WebGL, and I think the [khronos conformance suit](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/tree/master/conformance-suites/1.0.3) should be the best option.
Should I try to integrate it in wpt, or making a `tests/webgl` directory (or similar) inside the servo tree? (Maybe this question should be for @Ms2ger)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0de09b936e5e37c15b7865157a98ad78b1077659
I've done a bit of job to get this done. Right now readback is still used, but we have a `LayerId` -> `CanvasRenderer` map on the paint task, that we can use to get rid of that.
I'd want review, to see if this is a good approach (I know it's not the initial `CanvasId` -> renderer approach, but it's pretty similar, since a canvas involves a `PaintLayer`).
I had to do a bit of refactoring to avoid cyclic dependencies between canvas and gfx. I'd want you to review them too.
It's mergeable and doesn't break any tests :P
Some of my main concerns:
* Does the canvas render really need to be behind an `Arc<Mutex<T>>`?
* I can't clone a `NativeSurface` right now (that's why the `SendNativeSurface()` msg is unimplemented in the WebGL task). It should be easy to add that to rust-layers, supposing the caller is responsible to mark it as non-leaking, any reason to not do it?
cc @jdm @pcwalton
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ad53e95080144485e74cd9b9d48ce75e20de4e36
--HG--
rename : servo/components/gfx/color.rs => servo/components/gfx_traits/color.rs
Glenn Watson
Anthony Ramine
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Simon Martin
David Zbarsky
Roman Klauke
Patrick Walton
Ravi Shankar
Thiago Pontes
Johann Tuffe
Josh Matthews
Bogdan Cuza
Ms2ger
Corey Farwell
Hyowon Kim
Mátyás Mustoha