The difference is that PostRestyleEventForCSSRuleChanges sets
mRestyleForCSSRuleChanges true. In a subsequent patch,
we propagate a new TraversalRestyleBehavior flag to servo side
if mRestyleForCSSRuleChanges is true.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IKsBbm09uT9
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5014c0a978f98e81543ec7766d2daa415317069c
Some changes to animations don't affect the computed style and yet still
require the layer to be updated. Therefore, we also need to call
AddLayerChangesForAnimation in ServoRestyleManager. In this patch, we
factor out this function from GeckoRestyleManager, so we can reuse it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LL7D1oGS65l
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cd028a3d8f5dc251ec6615918a0f9569f0af44f5
nsStyleContext::CalcDifference had an optimization where, when we knew
that the old and new style context have the same rule node, we knew that
the only change hints that would need to be handled are those in the
"not handled for descendants" category, generated due to explicit
'inherit' values on reset properties. This was because any changes due
to differences in inherited properties should only have generated
"handled for descendants" change hints (and thus would already have been
handled on an ancestor).
Before bug 931668, this let us avoid calling CalcDifference on structs
that only would have generated hints that we knew we already would have
handled. However, after bug 931668, we compare all structs anyway so
that we can set the aEqualStructs outparam, so we don't gain anything
from this optimization. We can still return these change hints we know
will not need to be handled, and rely on ElementRestyler::CaptureChange
to filter them out.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Ld1s2Js0i6r
This changes ElementRestyler::CaptureChange so that it avoids generating the
current frame's entire set of change hints, if only some of the hints were
handled by ancestors, and instead to remove the hints that we know are
subsumed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JvhxeQC6MmQ
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Boris Chiou
Cameron McCormack