I want this behind a pref so that I can investigate other bugs without building
locally.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FWbGUxNbbm
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 546ace867858f17b543bd11ef908c10fa63a022f
When SetSize etc. are called before OnChromeLoaded has been invoked,
the functions assume that the window initialization code wants to size
the window specifically, and thus ignore the values from the <window>
element.
However, bug 1439875 changes the behavior so that SizeShell is also
invoked before OnChromeLoaded, which confuses the functions above, and
causes some of the attributes not to be loaded properly.
This patch adds a separate flag to avoid ignoring those attributes when
those functions are invoked as part of SizeShell itself.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7jT8w9KGmzy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7bcc0b1fe96207561fbfd255c976cce695c1da8f
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8ad309e3f449cea1536bfbff8e8b1585fefbc186
extra : source : f582644f846cee16b554d694d24b4eb8ca3c5106
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
The only subtle thing is the mCenterAfterLoad stuff, which is gated after a
mChromeLoaded.
Other than that it follows the same pattern as bug 345560.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8qDiA2yn9DB
It seems that the layout system assumes those attributes are for size of
the <window> element, i.e. inner window size, not outer window size.
See for example nsContainerFrame::SyncWindowProperties. It reads
{min,max}{width,height} attributes from the element via
nsIFrame::GetXUL{Min,Max}Size, and passes them into SetSizeConstraints.
The latter inflates the sizes with window decoration size before calling
into widget code. It can also be seen that various XUL size related
methods on nsBox and nsIFrame put the same assumption.
The test test_windowminmaxsize.xul apparently puts the same assumption
as the layout system on the meaning of those properties.
(Another test test_resize_move_windows.xul, which tests effectiveness of
features of window.open, also fails if we size the window earlier than
current in bug 1439875, and doesn't fail with this patch on top. It may
indicate that it makes use of the same assumption, but I can't really
figure out how it does so.)
MozReview-Commit-ID: IdMwDc59Ltg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ae46c23e450f556cc4608b512890c4e27cf8623e
This patch was autogenerated by my decomponents.py
It covers almost every file with the extension js, jsm, html, py,
xhtml, or xul.
It removes blank lines after removed lines, when the removed lines are
preceded by either blank lines or the start of a new block. The "start
of a new block" is defined fairly hackily: either the line starts with
//, ends with */, ends with {, <![CDATA[, """ or '''. The first two
cover comments, the third one covers JS, the fourth covers JS embedded
in XUL, and the final two cover JS embedded in Python. This also
applies if the removed line was the first line of the file.
It covers the pattern matching cases like "var {classes: Cc,
interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu, results: Cr} = Components;". It'll remove
the entire thing if they are all either Ci, Cr, Cc or Cu, or it will
remove the appropriate ones and leave the residue behind. If there's
only one behind, then it will turn it into a normal, non-pattern
matching variable definition. (For instance, "const { classes: Cc,
Constructor: CC, interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu } = Components" becomes
"const CC = Components.Constructor".)
MozReview-Commit-ID: DeSHcClQ7cG
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d9c41878036c1ef7766ef5e91a7005025bc1d72b
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : source : 12fc4dee861c812fd2bd032c63ef17af61800c70
extra : intermediate-source : 34c999fa006bffe8705cf50c54708aa21a962e62
extra : histedit_source : b2be2c5e5d226e6c347312456a6ae339c1e634b0
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : source : 12fc4dee861c812fd2bd032c63ef17af61800c70
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c004a023389f1f6bf3d2f3efe93c13d423b23ccd