зеркало из https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
186 строки
8.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
186 строки
8.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
How To Contribute Code To Firefox
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
The whole process can be a bit long, and it might take time to get things right.
|
|
If at any point you are stuck, please don't hesitate to ask at `https://chat.mozilla.org <https://chat.mozilla.org>`_
|
|
in the `#introduction <https://chat.mozilla.org/#/room/#introduction:mozilla.org>`_ channel.
|
|
|
|
We make changes to Firefox by writing patches, testing them and pushing them into "the tree", the
|
|
term we use for all the code in Mozilla-Central. Let's get started.
|
|
|
|
Please see the :ref:`Firefox Contributors Quick Reference <Firefox Contributors' Quick Reference>` for simple check list.
|
|
|
|
Finding something to work on
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
| Bugs listed as 'Assigned' are not usually a good place to start,
|
|
unless you're sure you have something worthy to contribute. Someone
|
|
else is already working on it!
|
|
| Even with no assignee, it is polite to check if someone has recently
|
|
commented that they're looking at fixing the issue.
|
|
| Once you have found something to work on, go ahead and comment! Let
|
|
the bug submitter, reviewer, and component owner know that you'd like
|
|
to work on the bug. You might receive some extra information, perhaps
|
|
also made the assignee.
|
|
|
|
Find a bug we've identified as a good fit for new contributors.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
With more than a million bugs filed in Bugzilla, it can be hard to know
|
|
where to start, so we've created these bug categories to make getting
|
|
involved a little easier:
|
|
|
|
- `Codetribute <https://codetribute.mozilla.org/>`_ - our site for
|
|
finding bugs that are mentored, some are good first bugs, some are
|
|
slightly harder. Your mentor will help guide you with the bug fix and
|
|
through the submission and landing process.
|
|
- `Good First Bugs <https://mzl.la/2yBg3zB>`_
|
|
- are the best way to take your first steps into the Mozilla
|
|
ecosystem. They're all about small changes, sometimes as little as a
|
|
few lines, but they're a great way to learn about setting up your
|
|
development environment, navigating Bugzilla, and making
|
|
contributions to the Mozilla codebase.
|
|
- `Student Projects <https://bugzil.la/kw:student-project>`_ - are
|
|
larger projects, such as might be suitable for a university student
|
|
for credit. Of course, if you are not a student, feel free to fix one
|
|
of these bugs. We maintain two lists: one for projects `based on the
|
|
existing codebase <https://bugzil.la/kw:student-project>`_.
|
|
|
|
Fix that one bug
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
If there's one particular bug you'd like to fix about Firefox, Thunderbird, or
|
|
your other favorite Mozilla application, this can be a great place to
|
|
start. There are a number of ways to do this:
|
|
|
|
- `Search bugzilla <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/query.cgi>`_ for
|
|
relevant keywords. See pages on
|
|
`Bugzilla and Searching Bugzilla <https://bmo.readthedocs.io/en/latest/using/finding.html>`_ for further
|
|
help
|
|
- Learn the `bugzilla
|
|
component <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi>`_,
|
|
with which your pet bug is implemented, using the components list.
|
|
Browse this component on bugzilla for related bugs
|
|
|
|
Fixing your bug
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
We leave this in your hands. Here are some further resources to help:
|
|
|
|
- Check out
|
|
:ref:`Our Developer_Guide and its parent document <Working on Firefox>`
|
|
- Our :ref:`reviewer checklist <Reviewer Checklist>` is very
|
|
useful, if you have a patch near completion, and seek a favorable
|
|
review
|
|
- Utilize our build tool :ref:`mach`, its linting,
|
|
static analysis, and other code checking features
|
|
|
|
Getting your code reviewed
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
Once you fix the bug, you can advance to having your code reviewed.
|
|
|
|
Mozilla uses
|
|
`Phabricator <https://moz-conduit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/phabricator-user.html>`_
|
|
for code review.
|
|
|
|
Who is the right person to ask for a review?
|
|
|
|
- If you have a mentored bug: ask your mentor. They will help, or can
|
|
easily find out. It might be them!
|
|
- Run ``hg blame`` on the file and look for the people who have touched
|
|
the functions you're working on. They too are good candidates.
|
|
Running ``hg log`` and looking for regular reviewers might be a
|
|
solution too.
|
|
- The bug itself may contain a clear indication of the best person to
|
|
ask for a review
|
|
- Are there related bugs on similar topics? The reviewer in those bugs
|
|
might be another good choice
|
|
- We have an out of date `list of
|
|
modules <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules>`_, which lists peers and
|
|
owners for the module. Some of these will be good reviewers. In a
|
|
worst case scenario, set the module owner as the reviewer, asking
|
|
them in the comments to pick someone more suitable
|
|
|
|
Please select only one reviewer.
|
|
|
|
Following up and responding
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Once you've asked for a review, a reviewer will often respond within a
|
|
day or two, reviewing the patch, or saying when they will be able to
|
|
review it, perhaps due to a backlog. If you don't hear back within this
|
|
time, naturally reach out to them: add a comment to the bug saying
|
|
'review ping?', check the "Need more information from" box, and add the
|
|
reviewer's name. If they don't respond within a day or two, you can ask
|
|
for help on Matrix in the
|
|
`#introduction:mozilla.org <https://riot.im/app/#/room/#introduction:mozilla.org>`_
|
|
or
|
|
`#developers:mozilla.org <https://chat.mozilla.org/#/room/#developers:mozilla.org>`_
|
|
channels, or contact `Mike
|
|
Hoye <mailto:mhoye@mozilla.com?subject=Code%20Review%20Request%20&body=URL%3A%20%20%5Bplease%20paste%20a%20link%20to%20your%20patch%20here.%5D>`_
|
|
directly.
|
|
|
|
Don't hesitate to contact your mentor as well if this isn't moving.
|
|
|
|
For most new contributors, and even for long-time Mozillians, the first
|
|
review of your patch will be "Requested Changes" (or an "r-" in
|
|
Bugzilla). This does not mean you've done bad work. There is more work
|
|
to do before the code can be merged into the tree. Your patch may need
|
|
some changes - perhaps minor, perhaps major - and your reviewer will
|
|
give you some guidance on what needs to be done next.
|
|
|
|
This is an important process, so don't be discouraged! With our
|
|
long-lived codebase, and hundreds of millions of users, the care and
|
|
attention helping contributors bring good patches is the cornerstone of
|
|
the Mozilla project. Make any changes your reviewer seeks; if you're
|
|
unsure how, be sure to ask! Push your new patch up to Phabricator again and
|
|
ask for a further review from the same reviewer. If they accept your
|
|
changes, this means your patch can be landed into the tree!
|
|
|
|
Getting code into Firefox
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
Once your patch has been accepted, it is ready to go. Before it can be
|
|
merged into the tree, your patch will need to complete a successful run
|
|
through our `try
|
|
server <https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/TryServer>`_,
|
|
making sure there are no unexpected regressions. If you don't have try
|
|
server access already, your mentor, or the person who reviewed your
|
|
patch, will be able to help.
|
|
|
|
Ask the reviewer to land the patch for you.
|
|
For more details, see :ref:`push_a_change`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do it all again!
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Thank you. You've fixed your very first bug, and the Open Web is
|
|
stronger for it. But don't stop now.
|
|
|
|
Go back to step 3, as there is plenty more to do. Your mentor might
|
|
suggest a new bug for you to work on, or `find one that interests
|
|
you <http://www.whatcanidoformozilla.org/>`_. Now that you've got your
|
|
first bug fixed you should request level 1 access to the repository to
|
|
push to the try server and get automated feedback about your changes on
|
|
multiple platforms. After fixing a nontrivial number of bugs you should
|
|
request level 3 access so you can land your own code after it has been
|
|
reviewed.
|
|
|
|
More information
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
We're in the process of improving information on this page for newcomers
|
|
to the project. We'll be integrating some information from these pages
|
|
soon, but until then you may find them interesting in their current
|
|
form:
|
|
|
|
- `A guide to learning the Firefox
|
|
codebase <http://www.joshmatthews.net/blog/2010/03/getting-involve-with-mozilla/>`_
|
|
- `A beginner's guide to SpiderMonkey, Mozilla's Javascript
|
|
engine <https://wiki.mozilla.org/JavaScript:New_to_SpiderMonkey>`_
|
|
- `Mozilla platform development
|
|
cheatsheet <https://web.archive.org/web/20160813112326/http://www.codefirefox.com:80/cheatsheet>`_
|
|
(archive.org)
|