.. |
animate-display-table-opacity-ref.html
|
Bug 1245075 patch 2 - Fix EffectSet::GetEffectSet(nsIFrame*) and EffectCompositor::GetAnimationElementAndPseudoForFrame to only return effects when the frame is the style frame for its content. r=birtles
|
2016-02-07 08:43:49 -08:00 |
animate-display-table-opacity.html
|
Bug 1245075 patch 2 - Fix EffectSet::GetEffectSet(nsIFrame*) and EffectCompositor::GetAnimationElementAndPseudoForFrame to only return effects when the frame is the style frame for its content. r=birtles
|
2016-02-07 08:43:49 -08:00 |
animate-opacity-ref.html
|
…
|
|
animate-opacity.html
|
…
|
|
animate-preserves3d-ref.html
|
Bug 1206418 - Fix origin of animations and scissors for preserves3d. r=roc
|
2015-09-28 03:43:00 -04:00 |
animate-preserves3d.html
|
Bug 1206418 - Fix origin of animations and scissors for preserves3d. r=roc
|
2015-09-28 03:43:00 -04:00 |
background-position-after-finish.html
|
Bug 1292441 - Part 2: Reftest for backround-position-x animation. r=mstange
|
2016-08-08 12:54:05 +09:00 |
background-position-important.html
|
Bug 1292441 - Part 2: Reftest for backround-position-x animation. r=mstange
|
2016-08-08 12:54:05 +09:00 |
background-position-in-delay.html
|
Bug 1292441 - Part 2: Reftest for backround-position-x animation. r=mstange
|
2016-08-08 12:54:05 +09:00 |
background-position-ref.html
|
Bug 1292441 - Part 2: Reftest for backround-position-x animation. r=mstange
|
2016-08-08 12:54:05 +09:00 |
background-position-running.html
|
Bug 1292441 - Part 2: Reftest for backround-position-x animation. r=mstange
|
2016-08-08 12:54:05 +09:00 |
in-visibility-hidden-animation-pseudo-element-ref.html
|
Bug 1166500 - Part 0: Test that offscreen animation optimization does not throttle visible animations. r=dbaron
|
2016-05-24 12:57:42 +09:00 |
in-visibility-hidden-animation-pseudo-element.html
|
Bug 1166500 - Part 0: Test that offscreen animation optimization does not throttle visible animations. r=dbaron
|
2016-05-24 12:57:42 +09:00 |
in-visibility-hidden-animation-ref.html
|
Bug 1166500 - Part 0: Test that offscreen animation optimization does not throttle visible animations. r=dbaron
|
2016-05-24 12:57:42 +09:00 |
in-visibility-hidden-animation.html
|
Bug 1166500 - Part 0: Test that offscreen animation optimization does not throttle visible animations. r=dbaron
|
2016-05-24 12:57:42 +09:00 |
no-stacking-context-animation-ref.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
partially-out-of-view-animation-ref.html
|
Bug 1166500 - Part 0: Test that offscreen animation optimization does not throttle visible animations. r=dbaron
|
2016-05-24 12:57:42 +09:00 |
partially-out-of-view-animation.html
|
Bug 1166500 - Part 0: Test that offscreen animation optimization does not throttle visible animations. r=dbaron
|
2016-05-24 12:57:42 +09:00 |
print-no-animations-notref.html
|
…
|
|
print-no-animations-ref.html
|
…
|
|
print-no-animations.html
|
…
|
|
reftest-stylo.list
|
Bug 1288350 - Temporary reftest list for Stylo vs Gecko test r=heycam,manishearth
|
2016-09-05 11:45:39 +08:00 |
reftest.list
|
Bug 1292441 - Part 2: Reftest for backround-position-x animation. r=mstange
|
2016-08-08 12:54:05 +09:00 |
screen-animations-notref.html
|
…
|
|
screen-animations-ref.html
|
…
|
|
screen-animations.html
|
…
|
|
stacking-context-animation-ref.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-lose-opacity-1.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-lose-transform-none.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-opacity-1-animation.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-opacity-1-in-delay.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-opacity-1-with-fill-backwards.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-opacity-1-with-fill-forwards.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-paused-on-opacity-1.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-paused-on-transform-none.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-animation-on-svg.html
|
Bug 1277991 - We don't need to check ShouldBlockAsyncTransformAnimations() when we just want to know whether the frame has transform animations or not. r=birtles
|
2016-06-06 11:27:27 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-animation-with-backface-visibility.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-animation-with-preserve-3d.html
|
Bug 1277991 - We don't need to check ShouldBlockAsyncTransformAnimations() when we just want to know whether the frame has transform animations or not. r=birtles
|
2016-06-06 11:27:27 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-animation.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-in-delay.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-with-fill-backwards.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |
stacking-context-transform-none-with-fill-forwards.html
|
Bug 1278136 - Part 2: We should not check whether the animation can run on the compositor or it's paused when determining if we should create a stacking context. r=birtles,mattwoodrow
|
2016-06-27 12:52:53 +09:00 |