gecko-dev/xpcom/tests/SizeTest01.cpp

108 строки
3.0 KiB
C++

// Test01.cpp
#include "nsIDOMNode.h"
#include "nsCOMPtr.h"
#include "nsString.h"
NS_DEF_PTR(nsIDOMNode);
/*
This test file compares the generated code size of similar functions between raw
COM interface pointers (|AddRef|ing and |Release|ing by hand) and |nsCOMPtr|s.
Function size results were determined by examining dissassembly of the generated code.
mXXX is the size of the generated code on the Macintosh. wXXX is the size on Windows.
For these tests, all reasonable optimizations were enabled and exceptions were
disabled (just as we build for release).
The tests in this file explore only the simplest functionality: assigning a pointer
to be reference counted into a [raw, nsCOMPtr] object; ensuring that it is
|AddRef|ed and |Release|d appropriately; calling through the pointer to a function
supplied by the underlying COM interface.
Windows:
raw_optimized 31 bytes
raw, nsCOMPtr* 34
nsCOMPtr_optimized* 38
nsCOMPtr_optimized 42
nsCOMPtr 46
Macintosh:
raw_optimized, nsCOMPtr_optimized 112 bytes (1.0000)
nsCOMPtr 120 (1.0714) i.e., 7.14% bigger than raw_optimized et al
raw 140 (1.2500)
The overall difference in size between Windows and Macintosh is caused by the
the PowerPC RISC architecture where every instruction is 4 bytes.
On Macintosh, nsCOMPtr generates out-of-line destructors which are
not referenced, and which can be stripped by the linker.
*/
void
Test01_raw( nsIDOMNode* aDOMNode, nsString* aResult )
// m140, w34
{
/*
This test is designed to be more like a typical large function where,
because you are working with several resources, you don't just return when
one of them is |nullptr|. Similarly: |Test01_nsCOMPtr00|, and |Test01_nsIPtr00|.
*/
nsIDOMNode* node = aDOMNode;
NS_IF_ADDREF(node);
if ( node )
node->GetNodeName(*aResult);
NS_IF_RELEASE(node);
}
void
Test01_raw_optimized( nsIDOMNode* aDOMNode, nsString* aResult )
// m112, w31
{
/*
This test simulates smaller functions where you _do_ just return
|nullptr| at the first sign of trouble. Similarly: |Test01_nsCOMPtr01|,
and |Test01_nsIPtr01|.
*/
/*
This test produces smaller code that |Test01_raw| because it avoids
the three tests: |NS_IF_...|, and |if ( node )|.
*/
// -- the following code is assumed, but is commented out so we compare only
// the relevent generated code
// if ( !aDOMNode )
// return;
nsIDOMNode* node = aDOMNode;
NS_ADDREF(node);
node->GetNodeName(*aResult);
NS_RELEASE(node);
}
void
Test01_nsCOMPtr( nsIDOMNode* aDOMNode, nsString* aResult )
// m120, w46/34
{
nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMNode> node = aDOMNode;
if ( node )
node->GetNodeName(*aResult);
}
void
Test01_nsCOMPtr_optimized( nsIDOMNode* aDOMNode, nsString* aResult )
// m112, w42/38
{
// if ( !aDOMNode )
// return;
nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMNode> node = aDOMNode;
node->GetNodeName(*aResult);
}