Schemas for Mozilla's data ingestion pipeline and data lake outputs
Перейти к файлу
Toshihito Kikuchi 603b5583ed Add is_admin_without_uac to the launcher-process-failure ping 2019-09-06 10:55:23 -07:00
.circleci
.github
schemas
templates
tests/hindsight
validation
.dockerignore
.gitignore
CMakeLists.txt
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Dockerfile
LICENSE.txt
README.md
README.pioneer.md
README.shield.md

README.md

Mozilla Pipeline Schemas

This repository contains schemas for Mozilla's data ingestion pipeline and data lake outputs.

The JSON schemas are used to validate incoming submissions at ingestion time. The RapidJSON library is used for JSON Schema Validation. This has implications for what kinds of string patterns are supported, see the Conformance section in the linked document for further details.

To learn more about writing JSON Schemas, Understanding JSON Schema is a great resource.

The Parquet-MR schemas are used for direct to parquet output; some examples of Parquet-MR schemas can be found here: Parquet Schema Examples

Adding a new schema

  • Create the JSON Schema in the templates directory first. Make use of common schema components from the templates/include directory where possible, including things like the telemetry environment, clientId, application block, or UUID patterns. The filename should be templates/<namespace>/<doctype>/<doctype>.<version>.schema.json.
  • If the data will be saved in parquet form, also add a Parquet-MR schema at templates/<namespace>/<doctype>/<doctype>.<version>.parquetmr.txt.
  • Build the rendered schemas using the instructions below, and check those artifacts (in the schemas directory) in to the git repo as well. See the rationale for this in the "Notes" section below.
  • Add one or more example JSON documents to the validation directory.
  • Run the tests (either via Docker or directly) using the instructions below.
  • Once all tests pass, submit a PR to the github repository against the master branch.

Note that Pioneer studies have a slightly amended process.

Build

Prerequisites

On MacOS, these prerequisites can be installed using homebrew:

brew install cmake
brew install jq
brew install rust && cargo install --git https://github.com/trink/parquetfmt
brew cask install docker

CMake Build Instructions

git clone https://github.com/mozilla-services/mozilla-pipeline-schemas.git
cd mozilla-pipeline-schemas
mkdir release
cd release

cmake ..  # this is the build process (the schemas are built with cmake templates)

Running Tests via Docker

The tests expect example pings to be in the validation/<namespace>/ subdirectory, with files named in the form <ping type>.<version>.<test name>.pass.json for documents expected to be valid, or <ping type>.<version>.<test name>.fail.json for documents expected to fail validation. The test name should match the pattern [0-9a-zA-Z_]+

To run the tests:

# build the container with the pipeline schemas
docker build -t mps .

# run the tests
docker run --rm mps

Packaging and integration tests (optional)

Follow the CMake Build Instructions above, then:

cpack -G TGZ # (DEB|RPM|ZIP)

# Integration Tests (run on schema-test EC2 instance)
  # If running locally
    # The following RPM's must be installed:
      # luasandbox, hindsight, luasandbox-lfs, luasandbox-lpeg, luasandbox-rjson, luasandbox-cjson, luasandbox-parquet
    # The following external libraries must be installed
      # parquet-cpp
make # this sets up the tests in the release directory
ctest -V -C hindsight # loads all the schemas and tests the inputs in the validation directory against them

The following docker command will generate a report against a sample of data from the ingestion system given proper credentials. Running this is recommended when making modifications to many schemas or during review.

docker run \
    -e AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID \
    -e AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY \
    -v "$(pwd)":/app/mozilla-pipeline-schemas \
    -it mozilla/edge-validator:latest \
        make report

Pushes to the main repo will trigger integration tests in CircleCI that directly compare the revision to the dev branch. These tests do not run for forked PRs in order to protect data and credentials, but reviewers can trigger tests to run by pushing the PR's revisions to a branch of the main repo. We provide a script for this:

# Before running, double check that the PR doesn't make any changes to
# .circleci/config.yml that could spill sensitive environment variables
# or data contents to the public CircleCI logs.
./.github/push-to-trigger-integration <username>:<branchname>

For details on how to compare two arbitrary revisions, refer to the integration job in .circleci/config.yml. For more documentation, see mozilla-services/edge-validator.

Releases

  • The master branch is the current release and is considered stable at all times.
  • New versions can be released as frequently as every two weeks (our sprint cycle). The only exception would be for a high priority patch.
  • New releases occur the day after the sprint finishes.
    • The version in the dev branch is updated
    • The changes are merged into master
    • A new tag is created

Contributions

  • All non trivial contributions should start with an issue being filed (if it is a new feature please propose your design/approach before doing any work as not all feature requests are accepted).
  • If updating the glean schemas, be sure to update the changelog in include/glean/CHANGELOG.md.

Notes

All schemas are generated from the 'templates' directory and written into the 'schemas' directory (i.e., the artifacts are generated/saved back into the repository) and validated against the draft 4 schema a copy of which resides in the 'tests' directory. The reason for this is twofold:

  1. It lets us easily see and refer to complete schemas as they are actually used. This means that the schemas can be referenced directly in bugs and such, as well as being fetched directly from the repo for testing other schema consumers (test being important here, as any production use should be using the installable packages).
  2. It gives us a changelog for each schema, rather than having to reason about changes to templated external pieces and when/how that impacted a given doctype's schema over time. This means that it should be easy to look back in time for the provenance of different parts of the schema for each doctype.