Bug 662836: Don't require JS_EvaluateUCScriptInStackFrame to be able to extend call objects that the bytecode compiler didn't expect to be extensible. r=dvander

js/src/jit-test/tests/jaeger/bug563000/eif-call-newvar.js

@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ function callee() {
   assertJit();
   evalInFrame(1, "var x = 'success'");
 }
-function caller() {
+function caller(code) {
   assertJit();
+  eval(code);
   callee();
   return x;
 }
-assertEq(caller(), "success");
+assertEq(caller('var y = "ignominy"'), "success");
 assertEq(typeof x, "undefined");

js/src/jit-test/tests/jaeger/bug563000/eif-getter-newvar.js

@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
 setDebug(true);
 
 this.__defineGetter__("someProperty", function () { evalInFrame(1, "var x = 'success'"); });
-function caller(obj) {
+function caller(code, obj) {
   assertJit();
+  eval(code); // Make the compiler give up on binding analysis.
   obj.someProperty;
   return x;
 }
-assertEq(caller(this), "success");
+assertEq(caller("var y = 'ignominy'", this), "success");

js/src/jit-test/tests/jaeger/bug563000/eif-global-newvar.js

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// |jit-test| mjitalways;debug
+setDebug(true);
+
+function callee() {
+  assertJit();
+  evalInFrame(1, "var x = 'success'");
+}
+callee();
+assertEq(x, "success");

js/src/jit-test/tests/jaeger/bug563000/eif-trap-newvar.js

@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
 setDebug(true);
 
 function nop(){}
-function caller(obj) {
+function caller(code, obj) {
   assertJit();
+  eval(code); // Make the compiler give up on binding analysis.
   return x;
 }
 trap(caller, 7, "var x = 'success'; nop()");
-assertEq(caller(this), "success");
+assertEq(caller("var y = 'ignominy'", this), "success");