Fixed leaks by changing JSValue::toString()/toNumber() to return JSValue rather than JSValue*. LOAD_STRING now creates a JSString from a String*.

This commit is contained in:
beard%netscape.com 2000-05-09 03:11:54 +00:00
Родитель 17bcf1f4d9
Коммит 5511c85685
2 изменённых файлов: 34 добавлений и 26 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
case LOAD_STRING:
{
LoadString* ls = static_cast<LoadString*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(ls)] = JSValue(src1(ls));
(*registers)[dst(ls)] = JSValue(new JSString(src1(ls)));
}
break;
case BRANCH:
@ -376,25 +376,27 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
break;
case ADD:
{
// LEAKING like a sieve here because the toXXX are returning pointers
// to possibly new JSValues.
// could get clever here with Functional forms.
Arithmetic* add = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
if ((*registers)[src1(add)].isString()
|| (*registers)[src2(add)].isString()) {
JSValue *s = (*registers)[src1(add)].toString();
*(s->string) += *((*registers)[src2(add)].toString()->string);
(*registers)[dst(add)] = *s;
JSValue& dest = (*registers)[dst(add)];
JSValue& r1 = (*registers)[src1(add)];
JSValue& r2 = (*registers)[src2(add)];
if (r1.isString() || r2.isString()) {
dest = r1.toString();
JSString& str1(*dest.string);
JSString& str2(*r2.toString().string);
str1 += str2;
}
else {
(*registers)[dst(add)] = (*registers)[src1(add)].toNumber()->f64
+ (*registers)[src2(add)].toNumber()->f64;
JSValue num1(r1.toNumber());
JSValue num2(r2.toNumber());
dest = num1.f64 + num2.f64;
}
}
break;
case SUBTRACT:
{
// XXX should use toNumber().
Arithmetic* sub = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(sub)] =
JSValue((*registers)[src1(sub)].f64 -
@ -403,6 +405,7 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
break;
case MULTIPLY:
{
// XXX should use toNumber().
Arithmetic* mul = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(mul)] =
JSValue((*registers)[src1(mul)].f64 *
@ -411,6 +414,7 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
break;
case DIVIDE:
{
// XXX should use toNumber().
Arithmetic* div = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(div)] =
JSValue((*registers)[src1(div)].f64 /
@ -435,13 +439,13 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
case NEGATE:
{
Negate* neg = static_cast<Negate*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(neg)] = JSValue(-(*registers)[src1(neg)].toNumber()->f64);
(*registers)[dst(neg)] = JSValue(-(*registers)[src1(neg)].toNumber().f64);
}
break;
case POSATE:
{
Posate* pos = static_cast<Posate*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(pos)] = *(*registers)[src1(pos)].toNumber();
(*registers)[dst(pos)] = (*registers)[src1(pos)].toNumber();
}
break;
case NOT:

Просмотреть файл

@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
case LOAD_STRING:
{
LoadString* ls = static_cast<LoadString*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(ls)] = JSValue(src1(ls));
(*registers)[dst(ls)] = JSValue(new JSString(src1(ls)));
}
break;
case BRANCH:
@ -376,25 +376,27 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
break;
case ADD:
{
// LEAKING like a sieve here because the toXXX are returning pointers
// to possibly new JSValues.
// could get clever here with Functional forms.
Arithmetic* add = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
if ((*registers)[src1(add)].isString()
|| (*registers)[src2(add)].isString()) {
JSValue *s = (*registers)[src1(add)].toString();
*(s->string) += *((*registers)[src2(add)].toString()->string);
(*registers)[dst(add)] = *s;
JSValue& dest = (*registers)[dst(add)];
JSValue& r1 = (*registers)[src1(add)];
JSValue& r2 = (*registers)[src2(add)];
if (r1.isString() || r2.isString()) {
dest = r1.toString();
JSString& str1(*dest.string);
JSString& str2(*r2.toString().string);
str1 += str2;
}
else {
(*registers)[dst(add)] = (*registers)[src1(add)].toNumber()->f64
+ (*registers)[src2(add)].toNumber()->f64;
JSValue num1(r1.toNumber());
JSValue num2(r2.toNumber());
dest = num1.f64 + num2.f64;
}
}
break;
case SUBTRACT:
{
// XXX should use toNumber().
Arithmetic* sub = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(sub)] =
JSValue((*registers)[src1(sub)].f64 -
@ -403,6 +405,7 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
break;
case MULTIPLY:
{
// XXX should use toNumber().
Arithmetic* mul = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(mul)] =
JSValue((*registers)[src1(mul)].f64 *
@ -411,6 +414,7 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
break;
case DIVIDE:
{
// XXX should use toNumber().
Arithmetic* div = static_cast<Arithmetic*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(div)] =
JSValue((*registers)[src1(div)].f64 /
@ -435,13 +439,13 @@ JSValue Context::interpret(ICodeModule* iCode, const JSValues& args)
case NEGATE:
{
Negate* neg = static_cast<Negate*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(neg)] = JSValue(-(*registers)[src1(neg)].toNumber()->f64);
(*registers)[dst(neg)] = JSValue(-(*registers)[src1(neg)].toNumber().f64);
}
break;
case POSATE:
{
Posate* pos = static_cast<Posate*>(instruction);
(*registers)[dst(pos)] = *(*registers)[src1(pos)].toNumber();
(*registers)[dst(pos)] = (*registers)[src1(pos)].toNumber();
}
break;
case NOT: