* [mtouch] Allow code sharing assemblies from multiple locations if they're identical. Fixes#56498.
We disallow code sharing when the same assembly (based on name) is referenced
from multiple paths, but poke a hole in this logic by allowing the same
assembly from multiple paths when those assemblies are 100% identical, since
that should be 100% safe.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56498
* [tests] Comment out assert that asserts due to another bug.
* [mtouch] Don't look for assembly references in attributes in assemblies we ship. Partially fixes#49087.
Don't look for assembly references in attributes in assemblies we ship,
because it takes a significant amount of time to do this, and we can
precompute the fact that there aren't any such assembly references.
Additionally add a test to ensure we catch any changes to this assumption.
For a simple test app this makes rebuilding (without any changes) go from
~1.1s to ~0.4s.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=49087
* [tests] Simplify tests to not use [TestCaseSource].
Using [TestCaseSource] is nice when running from the IDE, since it shows all
test cases in the test tree.
Unfortunately it causes the console runner to freak out [1], because the method
that lists all the test cases calls Configuration's cctor, which calls
TestContext.CurrentContext.TestDirectory, which is apparently not safe this
early in the test run.
[1] I think 'freak out' is the appropriate term for this behavior, which has
absolutely no direct nor obvious connection to the cause of the problem:
System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingException: Cannot create channel sink to connect to URL 93a78115_c0da_4b6a_9661_9f9b9d9fb935/6669afd6_4.rem. An appropriate channel has probably not been registered.
Server stack trace:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.GetClientChannelSinkChain (System.String url, System.Object channelData, System.String& objectUri) [0x00019] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.GetOrCreateClientIdentity (System.Runtime.Remoting.ObjRef objRef, System.Type proxyType, System.Object& clientProxy) [0x0001d] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.GetRemoteObject (System.Runtime.Remoting.ObjRef objRef, System.Type proxyType) [0x00000] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.GetProxyForRemoteObject (System.Runtime.Remoting.ObjRef objref, System.Type classToProxy) [0x0001b] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.Unmarshal (System.Runtime.Remoting.ObjRef objectRef, System.Boolean fRefine) [0x0007a] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.Unmarshal (System.Runtime.Remoting.ObjRef objectRef) [0x00000] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.ObjRef.GetRealObject (System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext context) [0x0000f] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Serialization.ObjectManager.ResolveObjectReference (System.Runtime.Serialization.ObjectHolder holder) [0x00010] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Serialization.ObjectManager.DoFixups () [0x0007f] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.ObjectReader.Deserialize (System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.HeaderHandler handler, System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.__BinaryParser serParser, System.Boolean fCheck, System.Boolean isCrossAppDomain, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.IMethodCallMessage methodCallMessage) [0x00077] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.BinaryFormatter.Deserialize (System.IO.Stream serializationStream, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.HeaderHandler handler, System.Boolean fCheck, System.Boolean isCrossAppDomain, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.IMethodCallMessage methodCallMessage) [0x000a2] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.BinaryFormatter.Deserialize (System.IO.Stream serializationStream, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.HeaderHandler handler, System.Boolean fCheck, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.IMethodCallMessage methodCallMessage) [0x00000] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.BinaryFormatter.DeserializeMethodResponse (System.IO.Stream serializationStream, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.HeaderHandler handler, System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.IMethodCallMessage methodCallMessage) [0x00000] in <04300341516a482b9708b764d58af7ca>:0
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.BinaryClientFormatterSink.SyncProcessMessage (System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.IMessage msg) [0x00083] in <270c90abbc234cde9d33eb198a97cf71>:0
Make sure to instantiate an Assembly instance for every assembly loaded using
the cached list of assemblies.
Fixes the following test failures:
1. Xamarin.MTouch.RebuildTest_WithExtensions("single","",False,System.String[]) : second build
Expected: 0
But was: 1
2. Xamarin.MTouch.RebuildTest_WithExtensions("dual","armv7,arm64",False,System.String[]) : second build
Expected: 0
But was: 1
3. Xamarin.MTouch.RebuildTest_WithExtensions("llvm","armv7+llvm",False,System.String[]) : second build
Expected: 0
But was: 1
4. Xamarin.MTouch.RebuildTest_WithExtensions("debug","",True,System.String[]) : second build
Expected: 0
But was: 1
5. Xamarin.MTouch.RebuildTest_WithExtensions("single-framework","",False,System.String[]) : second build
Expected: 0
But was: 1
* [mtouch] Cache the list of assemblies we computed. Partially fixes#49087.
Computing the list of assemblies can be expensive, so cache it and re-use the
cached list if we can.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=49087
* [mtouch] Create directory before trying to create files to it.
If both an extension and the container app (or multiple extensions) reference
the same binding assembly for a framework, then we'd error out with an
internal error when trying to copy the framework from both locations to the
container app.
So instead detect when we're trying to copy multiple identical (by comparing
the on-disk contents) frameworks, and only copy one of them.
We'll still show an error if the frameworks are different, but now a nice
MT1035 error with a proper error description instead of an internal error.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
- Actually enable hybrid AOT by adding argument in right location
- Hybrid AOT and stripping does not play well currently with partial AOT
- Fix AOT makefile to work with nuget nunit
- https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55041
It does not make sense to support incremental builds for the simulator (since
no AOT compilation is done), it just makes the test matrix more complicated.
So simplify things by removing support for incremental builds.
We also ignore any (other) --assembly-build-target arguments, because building
to frameworks doesn't make sense either in the simulator.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55712
The linker doesn't allow it when building for bitcode:
> ld: -ignore_optimization_hints and -bitcode_bundle (Xcode setting ENABLE_BITCODE=YES) cannot be used together
> clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
This fixes the Xamarin.MTouch.StripBitcodeFromFrameworks(tvOS,Marker) mtouch test.
This dramatically decreases the size of watchOS apps built for debug when
using frameworks, because it ends up removing all the bitcode from
Mono.framework.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55256
* [runtime] Fix Xamarin-debug.framework's install name.
This makes building to frameworks work in debug mode.
* [mtouch] Fix check to add frameworks to watchKit extensions.
* [mtouch] Never pass -read_only_relocs to the native linker when bitcode is enabled.
* [mtouch] Bitcode requires linking with c++.
This particular case applies to shared libraries/frameworks (we already link
with c++ when building statically).
Of particular importance is if we're building for LLVM or not: this fixes a
bug where we wouldn't pass --llvm to the AOT compiler when compiling
assemblies to frameworks (which we do when sharing code).
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55555
When collecting a list of roots, it helps adding any roots we find to the list
of roots.
This fixes the MT0023 mtouch tests, since now we actually report MT0023
because we have a list of the root assemblies.
* Remove the MT0008 test, since the error will never be shown again.
* Check non-existent root assemblies and report MT0018 instead of MT0007 if
they look like command-line arguments.
* Collect all MT0018/MT0007 errors before reporting any of them.
Put simulator assemblies in MonoBundle/simulator for frameworks, so that we
can have a single framework that contains both device and simulator
assemblies without assemblies conflicting between device and simulator.
The device assemblies continue in the same place, in the MonoBundle directory,
so no additional checks are needed on device.
When in embeddinator mode, we must link the generated registrar and pinvoke
code into the framework we create.
This also requires creating the corresponding aot/link tasks after creating
the registrar/pinvoke tasks.
Also stop using `mdb` as the name for debug symbols and remove
> static MdbReader mdb_reader;
since we're not mkbundl'ing mtouch anymore.
Related to https://github.com/xamarin/xamarin-macios/pull/2002 for mmp
* [mtouch] Only iOS has version 8 (and earlier OS versions that don't support frameworks).
* [mtouch] Update logging to be less confusing when logging about WatchKit extensions.
* [mtouch] Don't compile P/Invoke wrappers for extensions that are sharing code.
The container app already has the P/Invoke wrappers.
* Use Visual Studio instead of Xamarin Studio.
* VS doesn't have mdtool, it has vstool.
Also there's no need to manually invoke the mdtool.exe executable anymore
(which we did because the mdtool executable had a min macOS version of 10.9,
and we used to build tests on older macOS versions [1]), since now we only run
tests on older macOS versions, we don't build those tests there.
[1] a1932b0ccd
We want to copy the aot data for both the 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of an
assembly even if the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the assembly are identical.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
Rolf Bjarne Kvinge
Chris Hamons
Sebastien Pouliot
Marek Safar
Alex Soto