Этот файл содержит невидимые символы Юникода, которые могут быть отображены не так, как показано ниже. Если это намеренно, можете спокойно проигнорировать это предупреждение. Используйте кнопку Экранировать, чтобы показать скрытые символы.
Этот файл содержит неоднозначные символы Юникода, которые могут быть перепутаны с другими в текущей локали. Если это намеренно, можете спокойно проигнорировать это предупреждение. Используйте кнопку Экранировать, чтобы подсветить эти символы.
Polly Roadmap
ℹ️ This documentation describes the previous Polly v7 API. If you are using the new v8 API, please refer to pollydocs.org.
The roadmap indicates currently envisaged or candidate development directions for Polly.
Community feedback on features you would like, or priorities, is welcome.
If you're interested in following and contributing to the development direction of Polly, join our public Slack channel for real-time discussion of ideas.
Medium priority
Refresh syntax
The number of overloads available to configure policies can cause confusion.
A mitigation could be splitting up the fluent syntax of step 2, policy configuration. Currently, all parameters of policy configuration (mandatory and optional) are configured in a single overload. Separating out the parameters (particularly optional ones) into postfix builder methods as below would reduce the overloads.
// Example syntax under consideration
var retryPolicy = Policy
.Handle<FooException>()
.RetryAsync(with => with
.RetryCount(3)
.DelayBeforeRetrying(...)
.OnRetry(ex, timespan => ...);
Whatever syntax reconfiguration could be chosen, policies should probably remain immutable once used.
Rate-limit Policy
A policy to limit the number of calls placed through the policy per timespan. Useful when calling a third-party system which imposes a rate-limit on its API, provided that rate-limit is known. Perhaps taking a similar approach (with refinements) to something like Jack Leitch's RateGate.
Compare BulkheadPolicy
. While BulkheadPolicy
is a parallelism-throttle, RateLimitPolicy
would be a serial throttle.
Note: A rate-limiting design of the RateGate kind, which 'holds back' already-executing hot Task
s or threads until it is their time/turn to proceed, is intrinsically vulnerable to memory bulges (all those waiting executions have to be held in memory) in high-volume scenarios where fresh requests consistently outstrip the permitted rate. Two possibilities to deal with this are co-operative demand control (aka back-pressure) and load-shedding.
In high-volume scenarios where you have control over the producers, co-operative demand control by back-pressure is recommended; Akka streams is a mature solution for this.
For those whose scenario is amenable to Rx, there may be the option of in-built operators such as throttle, buffer, sample and window.
A RateLimitPolicy
in Polly could still be useful, particularly if we can provide options for configurable load-limits/load-shedding. Possibilities include:
- a configurable upper-bound on the number of executions (across all threads) that are allowed to queue. (This would have nice symmetry with the queue on
BulkheadPolicy
.) - shedding actions which have been queuing longer than a configurable
TimeSpan
(whichTimeoutPolicy
already provides).
Discussion in our Slack channel around here also drew out the difference between being the rate-abiding or rate-imposing party. Being the rate-imposing party sounds as simple as rejecting excess calls immediately rather than allowing them to queue.
Honouring RetryAfter as an alternative to Rate-Limit Policy
Many Azure APIs impose a rate-limit on usage dependent on the pricing tier, eg CosmosDB, and many of the cognitive services.
If you are seeking a Rate-Limit policy in connection with these, be sure to explore the alternative of Retry policies honouring a 429 Retry-After response code. CosmosDB and many cognitive services APIs return 429 responses indicating when a request may be retried. Polly already offers WaitAndRetry overloads which can calculate the duration to wait based on the returned result (i.e. the Retry-After header in this case).
Lower priority at present
Consider moving handle-predicates to instance/interface-configuration style
The existing static Policy.Handle<FooException>(...)
syntax returning concrete-class PolicyBuilder
could be replaced with an instance-based style:
new PolicyBuilder()
.Handle<FooException>()
returning an IPolicyBuilder
interface.
The benefit would be easier unit-testing of policy building, as IPolicyBuilder
can be mocked. The main use case is where handle-clauses (ie the exception types) or other aspects of policies are driven from external configuration. Unit-testing styles without mocking are possible, but more indirect. Note: This only affects unit-testing .Handle<>
clauses; all fully-configured policies are already returned as interfaces and fully mockable.
Intellectually, this would be a good place for Polly to end up. Some challenges:
- Breaking change for all reactive-policy configuration.
- ASPNET Core HttpClientFactory depends on concrete
PolicyBuilder
.- A change by Polly to
IPolicyBuilder
would have to be co-ordinated with a major release of ASPNET Core. - It would not be possible to use the newer Polly (with
IPolicyBuilder
) with older versions of ASPNET Core. This would effectively lock the Polly version (cannot access any future releases) for projects using HttpClientFactory but not built on the newer version of ASPNET Core.
- A change by Polly to
- Using an
IPolicyBuilder
probably means the builder syntax would have to expose properties/methods which aren't part of a valid policy-building path.
Inactive
not currently in line for active development (usually due to unavailable developer resource)
Emit events, aggregate metrics to dashboards
Old-ish proposal: PROPOSAL--Polly-eventing-and-metrics-architecture
Slack channel: Metrics slack channel
Github discussion: #326
With the number of resilience strategies now available from Polly v5, emitting Policy events/statistics could be valuable.
Timings to completion/failure of Policy executions is now available via Polly.Contrib.TimingPolicy.
Circuit-breaker customisation
Some user requests concern refining circuit-breaker behaviour:
We could add a CustomCircuitBreaker(ICircuitController myCustomController)
to open up circuit-breaker customisation.
Getting involved
Comment on this roadmap here
Expressions of interest in developing any of the above functionality welcome! (for major features, contact the Polly team first to avoid duplication of effort). Some issues are also marked as 'up-for-grabs' at any time, in the Issues list. See also the notes for contributors!
Status
The roadmap is published for transparency and to solicit community input, but is by its nature indicative and subject to change: proposed features may be more difficult to implement than envisaged, or may be down-prioritised as we continue to seek the balance for the library between power and simplicity.
Features delivered from previous Roadmaps
Forthcoming in v8: #748: Performance improvements (major reduction in allocations); ability to pass input parameters to executions without using a closure
November 2019: Concurrent methods on PolicyRegistry
September 2019: New jitter formula (via Polly.Contrib.WaitAndRetry)
September 2019: Distributed Circuit Breaker (via Polly.Contrib.AzureFunctions.CircuitBreaker)
February 2019: Clarified sync/async policy separation. Added Source Link support.
February 2019: custom policies. Polly.Contrib.
April 2018: integration to IHttpClientFactory for ASPNET Core 2.1
February 2018: dynamic reconfiguration during running
November 2017: numerous small enhancements including durations to wait in wait and retry, based on error response.
October 2017: CachePolicy (thanks to @seanfarrow for much contribution to the thinking).
June 2017: PolicyRegistry (thanks to @ankitbko); interfaces.
May 2017: Share rich information between execution and control delegates (blog)
February 2017: NoOp Policy (thanks to @lakario)
December 2016: Polly v5.0.3 RTM:
- Full .NET Standard 1.0 compatibility
- Bulkhead policy
- Timeout policy (including walking away from executions with no in-built timeout)
- Fallback policy
- PolicyWrap,
- PolicyKeys and ContextData
- Rationalised .NET40 async support
October 2016: Polly v5.0-alpha, with four new policies: Bulkhead, Timeout, Fallback, and PolicyWrap
July 2016: .NET Core 1.0 RTM support; .NET Standard 1.0 support
June 2016: Policies to handle return values
June 2016: Polly.Net40Async
April 2016: Advanced Circuit Breaker
Mar 2016: Full ContextualPolicy support
Feb 2016: Manual control and public state for circuit breaker, for health/performance monitoring
Jan 2016: Full async support.
Getting Started
- Home
- Polly RoadMap
- Contributing
- Transient fault handling and proactive resilience engineering
- Supported targets
- Retry
- Circuit Breaker
- Advanced Circuit Breaker
- Timeout
- Bulkhead
- Cache
- Rate-Limit
- Fallback
- PolicyWrap
- NoOp
- PolicyRegistry
- Polly and HttpClientFactory
- Asynchronous action execution
- Handling InnerExceptions and AggregateExceptions
- Statefulness of policies
- Keys and Context Data
- Non generic and generic policies
- Polly and interfaces
- Some policy patterns
- Debugging with Polly in Visual Studio
- Unit-testing with Polly
- Polly concept and architecture
- Polly v6 breaking changes
- Polly v7 breaking changes
- DISCUSSION PROPOSAL- Polly eventing and metrics architecture