3.6 KiB
Are you the owner of the content that has been disabled, or authorized to act on the owner's behalf?
Yes
What files were taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository's URL:
https://github.com/popopxD/ESharp
https://github.com/popopxD/EnsageSharp
Do you want to make changes to your repository or do you want to dispute the notice?
Dispute the notice
Is there anything else you think we should know about why you believe the material was removed as a result of a mistake? (optional)
In short, the original repository are required to be under GPL-2.0 (which we implicit acknowledge that). In the original DMCA, he said that "This work not licensed under Open Source License.", while his work HAVE TO be licensed and acknowledged to be licensed under GPL-2.0.
In long:
- Proof
- In Custom Weather by axiieflex/Program.cs, lines 4 & 5 "using Ensage.Common;using Ensage.Common.Menu;".
- Ensage.Common is a Library under GPL-2.0, https://github.com/EnsageSharp/Ensage.Common
- Therefore, his software must be must be under GPL, or GPL-compatible license
- Therefore, his project is liencesed under Open Source License.
- He acknowledge that his work is going to be under GNU licences: The projects in my repository and in his repository had been released under Joduska.me (For EnsageSharp and LeagueSharp). EnsageSharp is developed after LeagueSharp, but the structure of 2 projects are the same). In Joduska.me forum, the global forum rules (https://www.joduska.me/forum/forum-6/announcement-1-global-forum-rules/) said that "LeagueSharp assemblies that use the Library "LeagueSharp.Common" are protected by the GNU license and have to be released open-source.". I understand EnsageSharp.Common is a different product, but the principle is the same: "Ensage.Common" is protected under GPL-2.0, so all the assemblies that use Ensage.Common have to be released open-source
Type (or copy and paste) the following statement: "I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good-faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled."
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good-faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.
Type (or copy and paste) the following statement: "I consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which my address is located (if in the United States, otherwise the Northern District of California where GitHub is located), and I will accept service of process from the person who provided the DMCA notification or an agent of such person."
I consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which my address is located (if in the United States, otherwise the Northern District of California where GitHub is located), and I will accept service of process from the person who provided the DMCA notification or an agent of such person.
Please confirm that you have you have read our Guide to Submitting a DMCA Counter Notice: https://help.github.com/articles/guide-to-submitting-a-dmca-counter-notice/
Yes, I have read that
So that the complaining party can get back to you, please provide both your telephone number and physical address:
Telephone number: [Private]
Address: [I want to disclose my address unless the situation escalate to the point where physical address are reuiqred]: [Private]
Please type your full legal name below to sign this request:
[Private]