WSL2-Linux-Kernel/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c

1808 строки
43 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* AT86RF230/RF231 driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2009-2012 Siemens AG
*
* Written by:
* Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
* Alexander Smirnov <alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com>
* Alexander Aring <aar@pengutronix.de>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
#include <linux/spi/at86rf230.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/ieee802154.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <net/mac802154.h>
#include <net/cfg802154.h>
#include "at86rf230.h"
struct at86rf230_local;
/* at86rf2xx chip depend data.
* All timings are in us.
*/
struct at86rf2xx_chip_data {
u16 t_sleep_cycle;
u16 t_channel_switch;
u16 t_reset_to_off;
u16 t_off_to_aack;
u16 t_off_to_tx_on;
u16 t_off_to_sleep;
u16 t_sleep_to_off;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
u16 t_frame;
u16 t_p_ack;
int rssi_base_val;
int (*set_channel)(struct at86rf230_local *, u8, u8);
int (*set_txpower)(struct at86rf230_local *, s32);
};
#define AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF (127 + 3)
/* tx retries to access the TX_ON state
* if it's above then force change will be started.
*
* We assume the max_frame_retries (7) value of 802.15.4 here.
*/
#define AT86RF2XX_MAX_TX_RETRIES 7
/* We use the recommended 5 minutes timeout to recalibrate */
#define AT86RF2XX_CAL_LOOP_TIMEOUT (5 * 60 * HZ)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
struct at86rf230_state_change {
struct at86rf230_local *lp;
int irq;
struct hrtimer timer;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
struct spi_message msg;
struct spi_transfer trx;
u8 buf[AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF];
void (*complete)(void *context);
u8 from_state;
u8 to_state;
bool free;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
};
struct at86rf230_trac {
u64 success;
u64 success_data_pending;
u64 success_wait_for_ack;
u64 channel_access_failure;
u64 no_ack;
u64 invalid;
};
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
struct at86rf230_local {
struct spi_device *spi;
struct ieee802154_hw *hw;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
struct at86rf2xx_chip_data *data;
struct regmap *regmap;
int slp_tr;
bool sleep;
struct completion state_complete;
struct at86rf230_state_change state;
unsigned long cal_timeout;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
bool is_tx;
bool is_tx_from_off;
u8 tx_retry;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
struct sk_buff *tx_skb;
struct at86rf230_state_change tx;
struct at86rf230_trac trac;
};
#define AT86RF2XX_NUMREGS 0x3F
static void
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
at86rf230_async_state_change(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
const u8 state, void (*complete)(void *context));
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
static inline void
at86rf230_sleep(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
if (gpio_is_valid(lp->slp_tr)) {
gpio_set_value(lp->slp_tr, 1);
usleep_range(lp->data->t_off_to_sleep,
lp->data->t_off_to_sleep + 10);
lp->sleep = true;
}
}
static inline void
at86rf230_awake(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
if (gpio_is_valid(lp->slp_tr)) {
gpio_set_value(lp->slp_tr, 0);
usleep_range(lp->data->t_sleep_to_off,
lp->data->t_sleep_to_off + 100);
lp->sleep = false;
}
}
static inline int
__at86rf230_write(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int data)
{
bool sleep = lp->sleep;
int ret;
/* awake for register setting if sleep */
if (sleep)
at86rf230_awake(lp);
ret = regmap_write(lp->regmap, addr, data);
/* sleep again if was sleeping */
if (sleep)
at86rf230_sleep(lp);
return ret;
}
static inline int
__at86rf230_read(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int *data)
{
bool sleep = lp->sleep;
int ret;
/* awake for register setting if sleep */
if (sleep)
at86rf230_awake(lp);
ret = regmap_read(lp->regmap, addr, data);
/* sleep again if was sleeping */
if (sleep)
at86rf230_sleep(lp);
return ret;
}
static inline int
at86rf230_read_subreg(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int mask,
unsigned int shift, unsigned int *data)
{
int rc;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, addr, data);
if (!rc)
*data = (*data & mask) >> shift;
return rc;
}
static inline int
at86rf230_write_subreg(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int mask,
unsigned int shift, unsigned int data)
{
bool sleep = lp->sleep;
int ret;
/* awake for register setting if sleep */
if (sleep)
at86rf230_awake(lp);
ret = regmap_update_bits(lp->regmap, addr, mask, data << shift);
/* sleep again if was sleeping */
if (sleep)
at86rf230_sleep(lp);
return ret;
}
static inline void
at86rf230_slp_tr_rising_edge(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
gpio_set_value(lp->slp_tr, 1);
udelay(1);
gpio_set_value(lp->slp_tr, 0);
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
switch (reg) {
case RG_TRX_STATE:
case RG_TRX_CTRL_0:
case RG_TRX_CTRL_1:
case RG_PHY_TX_PWR:
case RG_PHY_ED_LEVEL:
case RG_PHY_CC_CCA:
case RG_CCA_THRES:
case RG_RX_CTRL:
case RG_SFD_VALUE:
case RG_TRX_CTRL_2:
case RG_ANT_DIV:
case RG_IRQ_MASK:
case RG_VREG_CTRL:
case RG_BATMON:
case RG_XOSC_CTRL:
case RG_RX_SYN:
case RG_XAH_CTRL_1:
case RG_FTN_CTRL:
case RG_PLL_CF:
case RG_PLL_DCU:
case RG_SHORT_ADDR_0:
case RG_SHORT_ADDR_1:
case RG_PAN_ID_0:
case RG_PAN_ID_1:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_0:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_1:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_2:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_3:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_4:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_5:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_6:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_7:
case RG_XAH_CTRL_0:
case RG_CSMA_SEED_0:
case RG_CSMA_SEED_1:
case RG_CSMA_BE:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_readable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
bool rc;
/* all writeable are also readable */
rc = at86rf230_reg_writeable(dev, reg);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* readonly regs */
switch (reg) {
case RG_TRX_STATUS:
case RG_PHY_RSSI:
case RG_IRQ_STATUS:
case RG_PART_NUM:
case RG_VERSION_NUM:
case RG_MAN_ID_1:
case RG_MAN_ID_0:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
/* can be changed during runtime */
switch (reg) {
case RG_TRX_STATUS:
case RG_TRX_STATE:
case RG_PHY_RSSI:
case RG_PHY_ED_LEVEL:
case RG_IRQ_STATUS:
case RG_VREG_CTRL:
case RG_PLL_CF:
case RG_PLL_DCU:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_precious(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
/* don't clear irq line on read */
switch (reg) {
case RG_IRQ_STATUS:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static const struct regmap_config at86rf230_regmap_spi_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
.write_flag_mask = CMD_REG | CMD_WRITE,
.read_flag_mask = CMD_REG,
.cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
.max_register = AT86RF2XX_NUMREGS,
.writeable_reg = at86rf230_reg_writeable,
.readable_reg = at86rf230_reg_readable,
.volatile_reg = at86rf230_reg_volatile,
.precious_reg = at86rf230_reg_precious,
};
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
static void
at86rf230_async_error_recover_complete(void *context)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
if (ctx->free)
kfree(ctx);
ieee802154_wake_queue(lp->hw);
}
static void
at86rf230_async_error_recover(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
lp->is_tx = 0;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_RX_AACK_ON,
at86rf230_async_error_recover_complete);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static inline void
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
at86rf230_async_error(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx, int rc)
{
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "spi_async error %d\n", rc);
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF,
at86rf230_async_error_recover);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
/* Generic function to get some register value in async mode */
static void
at86rf230_async_read_reg(struct at86rf230_local *lp, u8 reg,
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
void (*complete)(void *context))
{
int rc;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
u8 *tx_buf = ctx->buf;
tx_buf[0] = (reg & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG;
ctx->msg.complete = complete;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_async_write_reg(struct at86rf230_local *lp, u8 reg, u8 val,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
void (*complete)(void *context))
{
int rc;
ctx->buf[0] = (reg & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG | CMD_WRITE;
ctx->buf[1] = val;
ctx->msg.complete = complete;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_async_state_assert(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
const u8 trx_state = buf[1] & TRX_STATE_MASK;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
/* Assert state change */
if (trx_state != ctx->to_state) {
/* Special handling if transceiver state is in
* STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK and a SHR was detected.
*/
if (trx_state == STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK) {
/* Undocumented race condition. If we send a state
* change to STATE_RX_AACK_ON the transceiver could
* change his state automatically to STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK
* if a SHR was detected. This is not an error, but we
* can't assert this.
*/
if (ctx->to_state == STATE_RX_AACK_ON)
goto done;
/* If we change to STATE_TX_ON without forcing and
* transceiver state is STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK, we wait
* 'tFrame + tPAck' receiving time. In this time the
* PDU should be received. If the transceiver is still
* in STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK, we run a force state change
* to STATE_TX_ON. This is a timeout handling, if the
* transceiver stucks in STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK.
*
* Additional we do several retries to try to get into
* TX_ON state without forcing. If the retries are
* higher or equal than AT86RF2XX_MAX_TX_RETRIES we
* will do a force change.
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
*/
if (ctx->to_state == STATE_TX_ON ||
ctx->to_state == STATE_TRX_OFF) {
u8 state = ctx->to_state;
if (lp->tx_retry >= AT86RF2XX_MAX_TX_RETRIES)
state = STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF;
lp->tx_retry++;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, state,
ctx->complete);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
return;
}
}
dev_warn(&lp->spi->dev, "unexcept state change from 0x%02x to 0x%02x. Actual state: 0x%02x\n",
ctx->from_state, ctx->to_state, trx_state);
}
done:
if (ctx->complete)
ctx->complete(context);
}
static enum hrtimer_restart at86rf230_async_state_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx =
container_of(timer, struct at86rf230_state_change, timer);
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATUS, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_assert);
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
/* Do state change timing delay. */
static void
at86rf230_async_state_delay(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
struct at86rf2xx_chip_data *c = lp->data;
bool force = false;
ktime_t tim;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
/* The force state changes are will show as normal states in the
* state status subregister. We change the to_state to the
* corresponding one and remember if it was a force change, this
* differs if we do a state change from STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK.
*/
switch (ctx->to_state) {
case STATE_FORCE_TX_ON:
ctx->to_state = STATE_TX_ON;
force = true;
break;
case STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF:
ctx->to_state = STATE_TRX_OFF;
force = true;
break;
default:
break;
}
switch (ctx->from_state) {
case STATE_TRX_OFF:
switch (ctx->to_state) {
case STATE_RX_AACK_ON:
tim = c->t_off_to_aack * NSEC_PER_USEC;
/* state change from TRX_OFF to RX_AACK_ON to do a
* calibration, we need to reset the timeout for the
* next one.
*/
lp->cal_timeout = jiffies + AT86RF2XX_CAL_LOOP_TIMEOUT;
goto change;
case STATE_TX_ARET_ON:
case STATE_TX_ON:
tim = c->t_off_to_tx_on * NSEC_PER_USEC;
/* state change from TRX_OFF to TX_ON or ARET_ON to do
* a calibration, we need to reset the timeout for the
* next one.
*/
lp->cal_timeout = jiffies + AT86RF2XX_CAL_LOOP_TIMEOUT;
goto change;
default:
break;
}
break;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
case STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK:
switch (ctx->to_state) {
case STATE_TRX_OFF:
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
case STATE_TX_ON:
/* Wait for worst case receiving time if we
* didn't make a force change from BUSY_RX_AACK
* to TX_ON or TRX_OFF.
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
*/
if (!force) {
tim = (c->t_frame + c->t_p_ack) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
goto change;
}
break;
default:
break;
}
break;
/* Default value, means RESET state */
case STATE_P_ON:
switch (ctx->to_state) {
case STATE_TRX_OFF:
tim = c->t_reset_to_off * NSEC_PER_USEC;
goto change;
default:
break;
}
break;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
default:
break;
}
/* Default delay is 1us in the most cases */
udelay(1);
at86rf230_async_state_timer(&ctx->timer);
return;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
change:
hrtimer_start(&ctx->timer, tim, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_async_state_change_start(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
const u8 trx_state = buf[1] & TRX_STATE_MASK;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
/* Check for "possible" STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS */
if (trx_state == STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) {
udelay(1);
at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATUS, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_change_start);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
return;
}
/* Check if we already are in the state which we change in */
if (trx_state == ctx->to_state) {
if (ctx->complete)
ctx->complete(context);
return;
}
/* Set current state to the context of state change */
ctx->from_state = trx_state;
/* Going into the next step for a state change which do a timing
* relevant delay.
*/
at86rf230_async_write_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATE, ctx->to_state, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_delay);
}
static void
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
at86rf230_async_state_change(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
const u8 state, void (*complete)(void *context))
{
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
/* Initialization for the state change context */
ctx->to_state = state;
ctx->complete = complete;
at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATUS, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_change_start);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_sync_state_change_complete(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
complete(&lp->state_complete);
}
/* This function do a sync framework above the async state change.
* Some callbacks of the IEEE 802.15.4 driver interface need to be
* handled synchronously.
*/
static int
at86rf230_sync_state_change(struct at86rf230_local *lp, unsigned int state)
{
unsigned long rc;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, &lp->state, state,
at86rf230_sync_state_change_complete);
rc = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lp->state_complete,
msecs_to_jiffies(100));
if (!rc) {
at86rf230_async_error(lp, &lp->state, -ETIMEDOUT);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
return 0;
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
static void
at86rf230_tx_complete(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
ieee802154_xmit_complete(lp->hw, lp->tx_skb, false);
kfree(ctx);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_tx_on(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_RX_AACK_ON,
at86rf230_tx_complete);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_tx_trac_check(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IEEE802154_AT86RF230_DEBUGFS)) {
u8 trac = TRAC_MASK(ctx->buf[1]);
switch (trac) {
case TRAC_SUCCESS:
lp->trac.success++;
break;
case TRAC_SUCCESS_DATA_PENDING:
lp->trac.success_data_pending++;
break;
case TRAC_CHANNEL_ACCESS_FAILURE:
lp->trac.channel_access_failure++;
break;
case TRAC_NO_ACK:
lp->trac.no_ack++;
break;
case TRAC_INVALID:
lp->trac.invalid++;
break;
default:
WARN_ONCE(1, "received tx trac status %d\n", trac);
break;
}
}
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ON, at86rf230_tx_on);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_rx_read_frame_complete(void *context)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u8 len, lqi;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
len = buf[1];
if (!ieee802154_is_valid_psdu_len(len)) {
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "corrupted frame received\n");
len = IEEE802154_MTU;
}
lqi = buf[2 + len];
skb = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
if (!skb) {
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "failed to allocate sk_buff\n");
kfree(ctx);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
return;
}
skb_put_data(skb, buf + 2, len);
ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(lp->hw, skb, lqi);
kfree(ctx);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_rx_trac_check(void *context)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
int rc;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IEEE802154_AT86RF230_DEBUGFS)) {
u8 trac = TRAC_MASK(buf[1]);
switch (trac) {
case TRAC_SUCCESS:
lp->trac.success++;
break;
case TRAC_SUCCESS_WAIT_FOR_ACK:
lp->trac.success_wait_for_ack++;
break;
case TRAC_INVALID:
lp->trac.invalid++;
break;
default:
WARN_ONCE(1, "received rx trac status %d\n", trac);
break;
}
}
buf[0] = CMD_FB;
ctx->trx.len = AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF;
ctx->msg.complete = at86rf230_rx_read_frame_complete;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc) {
ctx->trx.len = 2;
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_irq_trx_end(void *context)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
if (lp->is_tx) {
lp->is_tx = 0;
at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATE, ctx,
at86rf230_tx_trac_check);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
} else {
at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATE, ctx,
at86rf230_rx_trac_check);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
}
static void
at86rf230_irq_status(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
u8 irq = buf[1];
enable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
if (irq & IRQ_TRX_END) {
at86rf230_irq_trx_end(ctx);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
} else {
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "not supported irq %02x received\n",
irq);
kfree(ctx);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
}
static void
at86rf230_setup_spi_messages(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *state)
{
state->lp = lp;
state->irq = lp->spi->irq;
spi_message_init(&state->msg);
state->msg.context = state;
state->trx.len = 2;
state->trx.tx_buf = state->buf;
state->trx.rx_buf = state->buf;
spi_message_add_tail(&state->trx, &state->msg);
hrtimer_init(&state->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
state->timer.function = at86rf230_async_state_timer;
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
static irqreturn_t at86rf230_isr(int irq, void *data)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = data;
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
int rc;
disable_irq_nosync(irq);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!ctx) {
enable_irq(irq);
return IRQ_NONE;
}
at86rf230_setup_spi_messages(lp, ctx);
/* tell on error handling to free ctx */
ctx->free = true;
ctx->buf[0] = (RG_IRQ_STATUS & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
ctx->msg.complete = at86rf230_irq_status;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc) {
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
enable_irq(irq);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
return IRQ_NONE;
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static void
at86rf230_write_frame_complete(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
ctx->trx.len = 2;
if (gpio_is_valid(lp->slp_tr))
at86rf230_slp_tr_rising_edge(lp);
else
at86rf230_async_write_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATE, STATE_BUSY_TX, ctx,
NULL);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_write_frame(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
struct sk_buff *skb = lp->tx_skb;
u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
int rc;
lp->is_tx = 1;
buf[0] = CMD_FB | CMD_WRITE;
buf[1] = skb->len + 2;
memcpy(buf + 2, skb->data, skb->len);
ctx->trx.len = skb->len + 2;
ctx->msg.complete = at86rf230_write_frame_complete;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc) {
ctx->trx.len = 2;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_xmit_tx_on(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ARET_ON,
at86rf230_write_frame);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
}
static void
at86rf230_xmit_start(void *context)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
/* check if we change from off state */
if (lp->is_tx_from_off)
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ARET_ON,
at86rf230_write_frame);
else
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ON,
at86rf230_xmit_tx_on);
}
static int
at86rf230_xmit(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = &lp->tx;
lp->tx_skb = skb;
lp->tx_retry = 0;
/* After 5 minutes in PLL and the same frequency we run again the
* calibration loops which is recommended by at86rf2xx datasheets.
*
* The calibration is initiate by a state change from TRX_OFF
* to TX_ON, the lp->cal_timeout should be reinit by state_delay
* function then to start in the next 5 minutes.
*/
if (time_is_before_jiffies(lp->cal_timeout)) {
lp->is_tx_from_off = true;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TRX_OFF,
at86rf230_xmit_start);
} else {
lp->is_tx_from_off = false;
at86rf230_xmit_start(ctx);
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_ed(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 *level)
{
WARN_ON(!level);
*level = 0xbe;
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_start(struct ieee802154_hw *hw)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
/* reset trac stats on start */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IEEE802154_AT86RF230_DEBUGFS))
memset(&lp->trac, 0, sizeof(struct at86rf230_trac));
at86rf230_awake(lp);
enable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
return at86rf230_sync_state_change(lp, STATE_RX_AACK_ON);
}
static void
at86rf230_stop(struct ieee802154_hw *hw)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
u8 csma_seed[2];
at86rf230_sync_state_change(lp, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF);
disable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
/* It's recommended to set random new csma_seeds before sleep state.
* Makes only sense in the stop callback, not doing this inside of
* at86rf230_sleep, this is also used when we don't transmit afterwards
* when calling start callback again.
*/
get_random_bytes(csma_seed, ARRAY_SIZE(csma_seed));
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_SEED_0, csma_seed[0]);
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_SEED_1, csma_seed[1]);
at86rf230_sleep(lp);
}
static int
at86rf23x_set_channel(struct at86rf230_local *lp, u8 page, u8 channel)
{
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CHANNEL, channel);
}
#define AT86RF2XX_MAX_ED_LEVELS 0xF
static const s32 at86rf233_ed_levels[AT86RF2XX_MAX_ED_LEVELS + 1] = {
-9400, -9200, -9000, -8800, -8600, -8400, -8200, -8000, -7800, -7600,
-7400, -7200, -7000, -6800, -6600, -6400,
};
static const s32 at86rf231_ed_levels[AT86RF2XX_MAX_ED_LEVELS + 1] = {
-9100, -8900, -8700, -8500, -8300, -8100, -7900, -7700, -7500, -7300,
-7100, -6900, -6700, -6500, -6300, -6100,
};
static const s32 at86rf212_ed_levels_100[AT86RF2XX_MAX_ED_LEVELS + 1] = {
-10000, -9800, -9600, -9400, -9200, -9000, -8800, -8600, -8400, -8200,
-8000, -7800, -7600, -7400, -7200, -7000,
};
static const s32 at86rf212_ed_levels_98[AT86RF2XX_MAX_ED_LEVELS + 1] = {
-9800, -9600, -9400, -9200, -9000, -8800, -8600, -8400, -8200, -8000,
-7800, -7600, -7400, -7200, -7000, -6800,
};
static inline int
at86rf212_update_cca_ed_level(struct at86rf230_local *lp, int rssi_base_val)
{
unsigned int cca_ed_thres;
int rc;
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, SR_CCA_ED_THRES, &cca_ed_thres);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
switch (rssi_base_val) {
case -98:
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels = at86rf212_ed_levels_98;
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf212_ed_levels_98);
lp->hw->phy->cca_ed_level = at86rf212_ed_levels_98[cca_ed_thres];
break;
case -100:
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels = at86rf212_ed_levels_100;
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf212_ed_levels_100);
lp->hw->phy->cca_ed_level = at86rf212_ed_levels_100[cca_ed_thres];
break;
default:
WARN_ON(1);
}
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf212_set_channel(struct at86rf230_local *lp, u8 page, u8 channel)
{
int rc;
if (channel == 0)
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_SUB_MODE, 0);
else
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_SUB_MODE, 1);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
if (page == 0) {
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_BPSK_QPSK, 0);
lp->data->rssi_base_val = -100;
} else {
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_BPSK_QPSK, 1);
lp->data->rssi_base_val = -98;
}
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
rc = at86rf212_update_cca_ed_level(lp, lp->data->rssi_base_val);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
/* This sets the symbol_duration according frequency on the 212.
* TODO move this handling while set channel and page in cfg802154.
* We can do that, this timings are according 802.15.4 standard.
* If we do that in cfg802154, this is a more generic calculation.
*
* This should also protected from ifs_timer. Means cancel timer and
* init with a new value. For now, this is okay.
*/
if (channel == 0) {
if (page == 0) {
/* SUB:0 and BPSK:0 -> BPSK-20 */
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 50;
} else {
/* SUB:1 and BPSK:0 -> BPSK-40 */
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 25;
}
} else {
if (page == 0)
/* SUB:0 and BPSK:1 -> OQPSK-100/200/400 */
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 40;
else
/* SUB:1 and BPSK:1 -> OQPSK-250/500/1000 */
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 16;
}
lp->hw->phy->lifs_period = IEEE802154_LIFS_PERIOD *
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration;
lp->hw->phy->sifs_period = IEEE802154_SIFS_PERIOD *
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CHANNEL, channel);
}
static int
at86rf230_channel(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 page, u8 channel)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
int rc;
rc = lp->data->set_channel(lp, page, channel);
/* Wait for PLL */
usleep_range(lp->data->t_channel_switch,
lp->data->t_channel_switch + 10);
lp->cal_timeout = jiffies + AT86RF2XX_CAL_LOOP_TIMEOUT;
return rc;
}
static int
at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt(struct ieee802154_hw *hw,
struct ieee802154_hw_addr_filt *filt,
unsigned long changed)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_SADDR_CHANGED) {
u16 addr = le16_to_cpu(filt->short_addr);
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for saddr\n", __func__);
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_SHORT_ADDR_0, addr);
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_SHORT_ADDR_1, addr >> 8);
}
if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_PANID_CHANGED) {
u16 pan = le16_to_cpu(filt->pan_id);
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for pan id\n", __func__);
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PAN_ID_0, pan);
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PAN_ID_1, pan >> 8);
}
if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_IEEEADDR_CHANGED) {
u8 i, addr[8];
memcpy(addr, &filt->ieee_addr, 8);
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for IEEE addr\n", __func__);
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_IEEE_ADDR_0 + i, addr[i]);
}
if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_PANC_CHANGED) {
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for panc change\n", __func__);
if (filt->pan_coord)
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_I_AM_COORD, 1);
else
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_I_AM_COORD, 0);
}
return 0;
}
#define AT86RF23X_MAX_TX_POWERS 0xF
static const s32 at86rf233_powers[AT86RF23X_MAX_TX_POWERS + 1] = {
400, 370, 340, 300, 250, 200, 100, 0, -100, -200, -300, -400, -600,
-800, -1200, -1700,
};
static const s32 at86rf231_powers[AT86RF23X_MAX_TX_POWERS + 1] = {
300, 280, 230, 180, 130, 70, 0, -100, -200, -300, -400, -500, -700,
-900, -1200, -1700,
};
#define AT86RF212_MAX_TX_POWERS 0x1F
static const s32 at86rf212_powers[AT86RF212_MAX_TX_POWERS + 1] = {
500, 400, 300, 200, 100, 0, -100, -200, -300, -400, -500, -600, -700,
-800, -900, -1000, -1100, -1200, -1300, -1400, -1500, -1600, -1700,
-1800, -1900, -2000, -2100, -2200, -2300, -2400, -2500, -2600,
};
static int
at86rf23x_set_txpower(struct at86rf230_local *lp, s32 mbm)
{
u32 i;
for (i = 0; i < lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers_size; i++) {
if (lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers[i] == mbm)
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_TX_PWR_23X, i);
}
return -EINVAL;
}
static int
at86rf212_set_txpower(struct at86rf230_local *lp, s32 mbm)
{
u32 i;
for (i = 0; i < lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers_size; i++) {
if (lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers[i] == mbm)
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_TX_PWR_212, i);
}
return -EINVAL;
}
static int
at86rf230_set_txpower(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, s32 mbm)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
return lp->data->set_txpower(lp, mbm);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_lbt(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, bool on)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_LBT_MODE, on);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_cca_mode(struct ieee802154_hw *hw,
const struct wpan_phy_cca *cca)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
u8 val;
/* mapping 802.15.4 to driver spec */
switch (cca->mode) {
case NL802154_CCA_ENERGY:
val = 1;
break;
case NL802154_CCA_CARRIER:
val = 2;
break;
case NL802154_CCA_ENERGY_CARRIER:
switch (cca->opt) {
case NL802154_CCA_OPT_ENERGY_CARRIER_AND:
val = 3;
break;
case NL802154_CCA_OPT_ENERGY_CARRIER_OR:
val = 0;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CCA_MODE, val);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_cca_ed_level(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, s32 mbm)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
u32 i;
for (i = 0; i < hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels_size; i++) {
if (hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels[i] == mbm)
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CCA_ED_THRES, i);
}
return -EINVAL;
}
static int
at86rf230_set_csma_params(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 min_be, u8 max_be,
u8 retries)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
int rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MIN_BE, min_be);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MAX_BE, max_be);
if (rc)
return rc;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MAX_CSMA_RETRIES, retries);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_frame_retries(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, s8 retries)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MAX_FRAME_RETRIES, retries);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_promiscuous_mode(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, const bool on)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = hw->priv;
int rc;
if (on) {
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_DIS_ACK, 1);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_PROM_MODE, 1);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
} else {
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_PROM_MODE, 0);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_DIS_ACK, 0);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
}
return 0;
}
static const struct ieee802154_ops at86rf230_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.xmit_async = at86rf230_xmit,
.ed = at86rf230_ed,
.set_channel = at86rf230_channel,
.start = at86rf230_start,
.stop = at86rf230_stop,
.set_hw_addr_filt = at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt,
.set_txpower = at86rf230_set_txpower,
.set_lbt = at86rf230_set_lbt,
.set_cca_mode = at86rf230_set_cca_mode,
.set_cca_ed_level = at86rf230_set_cca_ed_level,
.set_csma_params = at86rf230_set_csma_params,
.set_frame_retries = at86rf230_set_frame_retries,
.set_promiscuous_mode = at86rf230_set_promiscuous_mode,
};
static struct at86rf2xx_chip_data at86rf233_data = {
.t_sleep_cycle = 330,
.t_channel_switch = 11,
.t_reset_to_off = 26,
.t_off_to_aack = 80,
.t_off_to_tx_on = 80,
.t_off_to_sleep = 35,
.t_sleep_to_off = 1000,
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
.t_frame = 4096,
.t_p_ack = 545,
.rssi_base_val = -94,
.set_channel = at86rf23x_set_channel,
.set_txpower = at86rf23x_set_txpower,
};
static struct at86rf2xx_chip_data at86rf231_data = {
.t_sleep_cycle = 330,
.t_channel_switch = 24,
.t_reset_to_off = 37,
.t_off_to_aack = 110,
.t_off_to_tx_on = 110,
.t_off_to_sleep = 35,
.t_sleep_to_off = 1000,
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
.t_frame = 4096,
.t_p_ack = 545,
.rssi_base_val = -91,
.set_channel = at86rf23x_set_channel,
.set_txpower = at86rf23x_set_txpower,
};
static struct at86rf2xx_chip_data at86rf212_data = {
.t_sleep_cycle = 330,
.t_channel_switch = 11,
.t_reset_to_off = 26,
.t_off_to_aack = 200,
.t_off_to_tx_on = 200,
.t_off_to_sleep = 35,
.t_sleep_to_off = 1000,
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
.t_frame = 4096,
.t_p_ack = 545,
.rssi_base_val = -100,
.set_channel = at86rf212_set_channel,
.set_txpower = at86rf212_set_txpower,
};
static int at86rf230_hw_init(struct at86rf230_local *lp, u8 xtal_trim)
{
int rc, irq_type, irq_pol = IRQ_ACTIVE_HIGH;
unsigned int dvdd;
u8 csma_seed[2];
rc = at86rf230_sync_state_change(lp, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF);
if (rc)
return rc;
irq_type = irq_get_trigger_type(lp->spi->irq);
if (irq_type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING ||
irq_type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
irq_pol = IRQ_ACTIVE_LOW;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_POLARITY, irq_pol);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_RX_SAFE_MODE, 1);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_MASK, IRQ_TRX_END);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* reset values differs in at86rf231 and at86rf233 */
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_MASK_MODE, 0);
if (rc)
return rc;
get_random_bytes(csma_seed, ARRAY_SIZE(csma_seed));
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_SEED_0, csma_seed[0]);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_SEED_1, csma_seed[1]);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* CLKM changes are applied immediately */
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CLKM_SHA_SEL, 0x00);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* Turn CLKM Off */
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CLKM_CTRL, 0x00);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* Wait the next SLEEP cycle */
usleep_range(lp->data->t_sleep_cycle,
lp->data->t_sleep_cycle + 100);
/* xtal_trim value is calculated by:
* CL = 0.5 * (CX + CTRIM + CPAR)
*
* whereas:
* CL = capacitor of used crystal
* CX = connected capacitors at xtal pins
* CPAR = in all at86rf2xx datasheets this is a constant value 3 pF,
* but this is different on each board setup. You need to fine
* tuning this value via CTRIM.
* CTRIM = variable capacitor setting. Resolution is 0.3 pF range is
* 0 pF upto 4.5 pF.
*
* Examples:
* atben transceiver:
*
* CL = 8 pF
* CX = 12 pF
* CPAR = 3 pF (We assume the magic constant from datasheet)
* CTRIM = 0.9 pF
*
* (12+0.9+3)/2 = 7.95 which is nearly at 8 pF
*
* xtal_trim = 0x3
*
* openlabs transceiver:
*
* CL = 16 pF
* CX = 22 pF
* CPAR = 3 pF (We assume the magic constant from datasheet)
* CTRIM = 4.5 pF
*
* (22+4.5+3)/2 = 14.75 which is the nearest value to 16 pF
*
* xtal_trim = 0xf
*/
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_XTAL_TRIM, xtal_trim);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, SR_DVDD_OK, &dvdd);
if (rc)
return rc;
if (!dvdd) {
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "DVDD error\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Force setting slotted operation bit to 0. Sometimes the atben
* sets this bit and I don't know why. We set this always force
* to zero while probing.
*/
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_SLOTTED_OPERATION, 0);
}
static int
at86rf230_get_pdata(struct spi_device *spi, int *rstn, int *slp_tr,
u8 *xtal_trim)
{
struct at86rf230_platform_data *pdata = spi->dev.platform_data;
int ret;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) || !spi->dev.of_node) {
if (!pdata)
return -ENOENT;
*rstn = pdata->rstn;
*slp_tr = pdata->slp_tr;
*xtal_trim = pdata->xtal_trim;
return 0;
}
*rstn = of_get_named_gpio(spi->dev.of_node, "reset-gpio", 0);
*slp_tr = of_get_named_gpio(spi->dev.of_node, "sleep-gpio", 0);
ret = of_property_read_u8(spi->dev.of_node, "xtal-trim", xtal_trim);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
return ret;
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_detect_device(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
unsigned int part, version, val;
u16 man_id = 0;
const char *chip;
int rc;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_MAN_ID_0, &val);
if (rc)
return rc;
man_id |= val;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_MAN_ID_1, &val);
if (rc)
return rc;
man_id |= (val << 8);
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_PART_NUM, &part);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_VERSION_NUM, &version);
if (rc)
return rc;
if (man_id != 0x001f) {
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "Non-Atmel dev found (MAN_ID %02x %02x)\n",
man_id >> 8, man_id & 0xFF);
return -EINVAL;
}
lp->hw->flags = IEEE802154_HW_TX_OMIT_CKSUM |
IEEE802154_HW_CSMA_PARAMS |
IEEE802154_HW_FRAME_RETRIES | IEEE802154_HW_AFILT |
IEEE802154_HW_PROMISCUOUS;
lp->hw->phy->flags = WPAN_PHY_FLAG_TXPOWER |
WPAN_PHY_FLAG_CCA_ED_LEVEL |
WPAN_PHY_FLAG_CCA_MODE;
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_modes = BIT(NL802154_CCA_ENERGY) |
BIT(NL802154_CCA_CARRIER) | BIT(NL802154_CCA_ENERGY_CARRIER);
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_opts = BIT(NL802154_CCA_OPT_ENERGY_CARRIER_AND) |
BIT(NL802154_CCA_OPT_ENERGY_CARRIER_OR);
lp->hw->phy->cca.mode = NL802154_CCA_ENERGY;
switch (part) {
case 2:
chip = "at86rf230";
rc = -ENOTSUPP;
goto not_supp;
case 3:
chip = "at86rf231";
lp->data = &at86rf231_data;
lp->hw->phy->supported.channels[0] = 0x7FFF800;
lp->hw->phy->current_channel = 11;
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 16;
lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers = at86rf231_powers;
lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf231_powers);
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels = at86rf231_ed_levels;
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf231_ed_levels);
break;
case 7:
chip = "at86rf212";
lp->data = &at86rf212_data;
lp->hw->flags |= IEEE802154_HW_LBT;
lp->hw->phy->supported.channels[0] = 0x00007FF;
lp->hw->phy->supported.channels[2] = 0x00007FF;
lp->hw->phy->current_channel = 5;
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 25;
lp->hw->phy->supported.lbt = NL802154_SUPPORTED_BOOL_BOTH;
lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers = at86rf212_powers;
lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf212_powers);
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels = at86rf212_ed_levels_100;
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf212_ed_levels_100);
break;
case 11:
chip = "at86rf233";
lp->data = &at86rf233_data;
lp->hw->phy->supported.channels[0] = 0x7FFF800;
lp->hw->phy->current_channel = 13;
lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 16;
lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers = at86rf233_powers;
lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf233_powers);
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels = at86rf233_ed_levels;
lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels_size = ARRAY_SIZE(at86rf233_ed_levels);
break;
default:
chip = "unknown";
rc = -ENOTSUPP;
goto not_supp;
}
lp->hw->phy->cca_ed_level = lp->hw->phy->supported.cca_ed_levels[7];
lp->hw->phy->transmit_power = lp->hw->phy->supported.tx_powers[0];
not_supp:
dev_info(&lp->spi->dev, "Detected %s chip version %d\n", chip, version);
return rc;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IEEE802154_AT86RF230_DEBUGFS
static struct dentry *at86rf230_debugfs_root;
static int at86rf230_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = file->private;
seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.success);
seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_DATA_PENDING:\t%8llu\n",
lp->trac.success_data_pending);
seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_WAIT_FOR_ACK:\t%8llu\n",
lp->trac.success_wait_for_ack);
seq_printf(file, "CHANNEL_ACCESS_FAILURE:\t%8llu\n",
lp->trac.channel_access_failure);
seq_printf(file, "NO_ACK:\t\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.no_ack);
seq_printf(file, "INVALID:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.invalid);
return 0;
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(at86rf230_stats);
static void at86rf230_debugfs_init(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
char debugfs_dir_name[DNAME_INLINE_LEN + 1] = "at86rf230-";
strncat(debugfs_dir_name, dev_name(&lp->spi->dev), DNAME_INLINE_LEN);
at86rf230_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir(debugfs_dir_name, NULL);
debugfs_create_file("trac_stats", 0444, at86rf230_debugfs_root, lp,
&at86rf230_stats_fops);
}
static void at86rf230_debugfs_remove(void)
{
debugfs_remove_recursive(at86rf230_debugfs_root);
}
#else
static void at86rf230_debugfs_init(struct at86rf230_local *lp) { }
static void at86rf230_debugfs_remove(void) { }
#endif
static int at86rf230_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct ieee802154_hw *hw;
struct at86rf230_local *lp;
unsigned int status;
int rc, irq_type, rstn, slp_tr;
u8 xtal_trim = 0;
if (!spi->irq) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "no IRQ specified\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
rc = at86rf230_get_pdata(spi, &rstn, &slp_tr, &xtal_trim);
if (rc < 0) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "failed to parse platform_data: %d\n", rc);
return rc;
}
if (gpio_is_valid(rstn)) {
rc = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, rstn,
GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "rstn");
if (rc)
return rc;
}
if (gpio_is_valid(slp_tr)) {
rc = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, slp_tr,
GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "slp_tr");
if (rc)
return rc;
}
/* Reset */
if (gpio_is_valid(rstn)) {
udelay(1);
gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 0);
udelay(1);
gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 1);
usleep_range(120, 240);
}
hw = ieee802154_alloc_hw(sizeof(*lp), &at86rf230_ops);
if (!hw)
return -ENOMEM;
lp = hw->priv;
lp->hw = hw;
lp->spi = spi;
lp->slp_tr = slp_tr;
hw->parent = &spi->dev;
ieee802154_random_extended_addr(&hw->phy->perm_extended_addr);
lp->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &at86rf230_regmap_spi_config);
if (IS_ERR(lp->regmap)) {
rc = PTR_ERR(lp->regmap);
dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n",
rc);
goto free_dev;
}
at86rf230_setup_spi_messages(lp, &lp->state);
at86rf230_setup_spi_messages(lp, &lp->tx);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
rc = at86rf230_detect_device(lp);
if (rc < 0)
goto free_dev;
init_completion(&lp->state_complete);
spi_set_drvdata(spi, lp);
rc = at86rf230_hw_init(lp, xtal_trim);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
goto free_dev;
/* Read irq status register to reset irq line */
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, RG_IRQ_STATUS, 0xff, 0, &status);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
goto free_dev;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
irq_type = irq_get_trigger_type(spi->irq);
if (!irq_type)
irq_type = IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
rc = devm_request_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq, at86rf230_isr,
IRQF_SHARED | irq_type, dev_name(&spi->dev), lp);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 02:20:48 +04:00
goto free_dev;
/* disable_irq by default and wait for starting hardware */
disable_irq(spi->irq);
/* going into sleep by default */
at86rf230_sleep(lp);
at86rf230_debugfs_init(lp);
rc = ieee802154_register_hw(lp->hw);
if (rc)
goto free_debugfs;
return rc;
free_debugfs:
at86rf230_debugfs_remove();
free_dev:
ieee802154_free_hw(lp->hw);
return rc;
}
static int at86rf230_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
at86rf230: mask irq's before deregister device While transmit over a at86rf231 device and unloading the module I got: [ 29.643073] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3 at kernel/workqueue.c:1335 __queue_work+0xb4/0x224() [ 29.651457] Modules linked in: at86rf230(-) autofs4 [ 29.656612] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc6-01602-g902659e-dirty #294 [ 29.666490] [<c00124f0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010ad0>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 29.674628] [<c0010ad0>] (show_stack) from [<c0032c80>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x80) [ 29.683116] [<c0032c80>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0032d30>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20) [ 29.692329] [<c0032d30>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0045b08>] (__queue_work+0xb4/0x224) [ 29.700906] [<c0045b08>] (__queue_work) from [<c0045cc8>] (queue_work_on+0x50/0x78) [ 29.708944] [<c0045cc8>] (queue_work_on) from [<c05669cc>] (mac802154_tx+0x1e4/0x240) [ 29.717164] [<c05669cc>] (mac802154_tx) from [<c0471814>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x2f0/0x43c) [ 29.725926] [<c0471814>] (dev_hard_start_xmit) from [<c04878d0>] (sch_direct_xmit+0x64/0x2a0) [ 29.734867] [<c04878d0>] (sch_direct_xmit) from [<c0487c38>] (__qdisc_run+0x12c/0x18c) [ 29.743169] [<c0487c38>] (__qdisc_run) from [<c046e1b0>] (net_tx_action+0xe0/0x178) [ 29.751205] [<c046e1b0>] (net_tx_action) from [<c0036690>] (__do_softirq+0x100/0x264) [ 29.759420] [<c0036690>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0036818>] (run_ksoftirqd+0x24/0x4c) [ 29.767453] [<c0036818>] (run_ksoftirqd) from [<c005232c>] (smpboot_thread_fn+0x128/0x13c) [ 29.776121] [<c005232c>] (smpboot_thread_fn) from [<c004c3fc>] (kthread+0xd0/0xe4) [ 29.784061] [<c004c3fc>] (kthread) from [<c000da88>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 29.791628] ---[ end trace 3406ff24bd973834 ]--- The problem is there are still interrupts after deregister ieee802154 device. This patch mask all interrupts in the at86rf2xx chips before deregister the device. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-03-31 05:26:51 +04:00
/* mask all at86rf230 irq's */
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_MASK, 0);
ieee802154_unregister_hw(lp->hw);
ieee802154_free_hw(lp->hw);
at86rf230_debugfs_remove();
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "unregistered at86rf230\n");
return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id at86rf230_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf230", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf231", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf233", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf212", },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at86rf230_of_match);
static const struct spi_device_id at86rf230_device_id[] = {
{ .name = "at86rf230", },
{ .name = "at86rf231", },
{ .name = "at86rf233", },
{ .name = "at86rf212", },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, at86rf230_device_id);
static struct spi_driver at86rf230_driver = {
.id_table = at86rf230_device_id,
.driver = {
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(at86rf230_of_match),
.name = "at86rf230",
},
.probe = at86rf230_probe,
.remove = at86rf230_remove,
};
module_spi_driver(at86rf230_driver);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AT86RF230 Transceiver Driver");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");