netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of 'xt_bpf_info_v1'
Commit 2c16d60332
("netfilter: xt_bpf: support ebpf") introduced
support for attaching an eBPF object by an fd, with the
'bpf_mt_check_v1' ABI expecting the '.fd' to be specified upon each
IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE call.
However this breaks subsequent iptables calls:
# iptables -A INPUT -m bpf --object-pinned /sys/fs/bpf/xxx -j ACCEPT
# iptables -A INPUT -s 5.6.7.8 -j ACCEPT
iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information.
That's because iptables works by loading existing rules using
IPT_SO_GET_ENTRIES to userspace, then issuing IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE with
the replacement set.
However, the loaded 'xt_bpf_info_v1' has an arbitrary '.fd' number
(from the initial "iptables -m bpf" invocation) - so when 2nd invocation
occurs, userspace passes a bogus fd number, which leads to
'bpf_mt_check_v1' to fail.
One suggested solution [1] was to hack iptables userspace, to perform a
"entries fixup" immediatley after IPT_SO_GET_ENTRIES, by opening a new,
process-local fd per every 'xt_bpf_info_v1' entry seen.
However, in [2] both Pablo Neira Ayuso and Willem de Bruijn suggested to
depricate the xt_bpf_info_v1 ABI dealing with pinned ebpf objects.
This fix changes the XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED behavior to ignore the given
'.fd' and instead perform an in-kernel lookup for the bpf object given
the provided '.path'.
It also defines an alias for the XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode, named
XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED, to better reflect the fact that the user is
expected to provide the path of the pinned object.
Existing XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF behavior (non-pinned fd mode) is preserved.
References: [1] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150564724607440&w=2
[2] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150575727129880&w=2
Reported-by: Rafael Buchbinder <rafi@rbk.ms>
Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
49f817d793
Коммит
98589a0998
|
@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ static inline void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline struct net_device *__dev_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
|
||||
u32 key)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum xt_bpf_modes {
|
|||
XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED,
|
||||
XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF,
|
||||
};
|
||||
#define XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED
|
||||
|
||||
struct xt_bpf_info_v1 {
|
||||
__u16 mode;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ out:
|
|||
putname(pname);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_obj_get_user);
|
||||
|
||||
static void bpf_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
|
|||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/module.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/filter.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/bpf.h>
|
||||
|
@ -49,6 +50,22 @@ static int __bpf_mt_check_fd(int fd, struct bpf_prog **ret)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __bpf_mt_check_path(const char *path, struct bpf_prog **ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
|
||||
int retval, fd;
|
||||
|
||||
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
|
||||
fd = bpf_obj_get_user(path);
|
||||
set_fs(oldfs);
|
||||
if (fd < 0)
|
||||
return fd;
|
||||
|
||||
retval = __bpf_mt_check_fd(fd, ret);
|
||||
sys_close(fd);
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int bpf_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct xt_bpf_info *info = par->matchinfo;
|
||||
|
@ -66,9 +83,10 @@ static int bpf_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
|
|||
return __bpf_mt_check_bytecode(info->bpf_program,
|
||||
info->bpf_program_num_elem,
|
||||
&info->filter);
|
||||
else if (info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED ||
|
||||
info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF)
|
||||
else if (info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF)
|
||||
return __bpf_mt_check_fd(info->fd, &info->filter);
|
||||
else if (info->mode == XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED)
|
||||
return __bpf_mt_check_path(info->path, &info->filter);
|
||||
else
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче