[ Upstream commit 4cac29b846f38d5f0654cdfff5c5bfc37305081c ]
Ramp values are inverted. This caused wrong values written to register
when ramp values were defined in device tree.
Invert values in table to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Niemi <kaleposti@gmail.com>
Fixes: 1aad39001e ("regulator: Support ROHM BD71815 regulators")
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZmmJXtuVJU6RgQAH@latitude5580
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0f9f7c63c415e287cd57b5c98be61eb320dedcfc ]
Some of the regulators on the BD71828 have common voltage setting for
RUN/SUSPEND/IDLE/LPSR states. The enable control can be set for each
state though.
The driver allows setting the voltage values for these states via
device-tree. As a side effect, setting the voltages for
SUSPEND/IDLE/LPSR will also change the RUN level voltage which is not
desired and can break the system.
The comment in code reflects this behaviour, but it is likely to not
make people any happier. The right thing to do is to allow setting the
enable/disable state at SUSPEND/IDLE/LPSR via device-tree, but to
disallow setting state specific voltages for those regulators.
BUCK1 is a bit different. It only shares the SUSPEND and LPSR state
voltages. The former behaviour of allowing to silently overwrite the
SUSPEND state voltage by LPSR state voltage is also changed here so that
the SUSPEND voltage is prioritized over LPSR voltage.
Prevent setting PMIC state specific voltages for regulators which do not
support it.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Fixes: 522498f8cb ("regulator: bd71828: Basic support for ROHM bd71828 PMIC regulators")
Link: https://msgid.link/r/e1883ae1e3ae5668f1030455d4750923561f3d68.1715848512.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 68adb581a39ae63a0ed082c47f01fbbe515efa0e ]
Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(), so the module could be properly autoloaded
based on the alias from of_device_id table.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/20240410172615.255424-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7ab681ddedd4b6dd2b047c74af95221c5f827e1d ]
The regulator IRQ helper requires caller to provide pointer to IRQ name
which is kept in memory by caller. All other data passed to the helper
in the regulator_irq_desc structure is copied. This can cause some
confusion and unnecessary complexity.
Make the regulator_irq_helper() to copy also the provided IRQ name
information so caller can discard the name after the call to
regulator_irq_helper() completes.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/ZhJMuUYwaZbBXFGP@drtxq0yyyyyyyyyyyyydy-3.rev.dnainternet.fi
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2a4b49bb58123bad6ec0e07b02845f74c23d5e04 upstream.
regulator_get() may sometimes be called more than once for the same
consumer device, something which before commit dbe954d8f1 ("regulator:
core: Avoid debugfs: Directory ... already present! error") resulted in
errors being logged.
A couple of recent commits broke the handling of such cases so that
attributes are now erroneously created in the debugfs root directory the
second time a regulator is requested and the log is filled with errors
like:
debugfs: File 'uA_load' in directory '/' already present!
debugfs: File 'min_uV' in directory '/' already present!
debugfs: File 'max_uV' in directory '/' already present!
debugfs: File 'constraint_flags' in directory '/' already present!
on any further calls.
Fixes: 2715bb11cf ("regulator: core: Fix more error checking for debugfs_create_dir()")
Fixes: 08880713ce ("regulator: core: Streamline debugfs operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240509133304.8883-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit d3cf8a17498dd9104c04ad28eeac3ef3339f9f9f ]
The MT6360 regulator binding, the example in the MT6360 mfd binding, and
the devicetree users of those bindings are rightfully declaring MT6360
regulator subnodes with non-capital names, and luckily without using the
deprecated regulator-compatible property.
With this driver declaring capitalized BUCKx/LDOx as of_match string for
the node names, obviously no regulator gets probed: fix that by changing
the MT6360_REGULATOR_DESC macro to add a "match" parameter which gets
assigned to the of_match.
Fixes: d321571d5e ("regulator: mt6360: Add support for MT6360 regulator")
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/20240409144438.410060-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c92688cac239794e4a1d976afa5203a4d3a2ac0e ]
Continuous regulators can be configured to operate only in a certain
duty cycle range (for example from 0..91%). Add a check to error out if
the duty cycle translates to an unsupported (or out of range) voltage.
Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/20240113224628.377993-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7993d3a9c34f609c02171e115fd12c10e2105ff4 ]
The use_count of a regulator should only be incremented when the
enable_count changes from 0 to 1. Similarly, the use_count should
only be decremented when the enable_count changes from 1 to 0.
In the previous implementation, use_count was sometimes decremented
to 0 when some consumer called unbalanced disable,
leading to unexpected disable even the regulator is enabled by
other consumers. With this change, the use_count accurately reflects
the number of users which the regulator is enabled.
This should make things more robust in the case where a consumer does
leak references.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103074231.8031-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 08880713ce ]
If CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set:
regulator: Failed to create debugfs directory
...
regulator-dummy: Failed to create debugfs directory
As per the comments for debugfs_create_dir(), errors returned by this
function should be expected, and ignored:
* If debugfs is not enabled in the kernel, the value -%ENODEV will be
* returned.
*
* NOTE: it's expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors returned
* by this function. Other debugfs functions handle the fact that the "dentry"
* passed to them could be an error and they don't crash in that case.
* Drivers should generally work fine even if debugfs fails to init anyway.
Adhere to the debugfs spirit, and streamline all operations by:
1. Demoting the importance of the printed error messages to debug
level, like is already done in create_regulator(),
2. Further ignoring any returned errors, as by design, all debugfs
functions are no-ops when passed an error pointer.
Fixes: 2bf1c45be3 ("regulator: Fix error checking for debugfs_create_dir")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2f8bb6e113359ddfab7b59e4d4274bd4c06d6d0a.1685013051.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2715bb11cf ]
In case of failure, debugfs_create_dir() does not return NULL, but an
error pointer. Most incorrect error checks were fixed, but the one in
create_regulator() was forgotten.
Fix the remaining error check.
Fixes: 2bf1c45be3 ("regulator: Fix error checking for debugfs_create_dir")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ee980a108b5854dd8ce3630f8f673e784e057d17.1685013051.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2bf1c45be3 ]
This patch fixes the error checking in core.c in debugfs_create_dir.
The correct way to check if an error occurred is 'IS_ERR' inline function.
Signed-off-by: Osama Muhammad <osmtendev@gmail.com
Suggested-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515172938.13338-1-osmtendev@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit a511637502 upstream.
Add hardware version read check for PMIC MT6359
Signed-off-by: Sen Chu <sen.chu@mediatek.com
Fixes: 4cfc965475 ("regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359P regulator")
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230518040646.8730-1-sen.chu@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit c4a413e56d ]
Smatch reports:
drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:166 stm32_pwr_regulator_probe() warn:
'base' from of_iomap() not released on lines: 151,166.
In stm32_pwr_regulator_probe(), base is not released
when devm_kzalloc() fails to allocate memory or
devm_regulator_register() fails to register a new regulator device,
which may cause a leak.
To fix this issue, replace of_iomap() with
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
is a specialized function for platform devices.
It allows 'base' to be automatically released whether the probe
function succeeds or fails.
Besides, use IS_ERR(base) instead of !base
as the return value of devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
can either be a pointer to the remapped memory or
an ERR_PTR() encoded error code if the operation fails.
Fixes: dc62f951a6 ("regulator: stm32-pwr: Fix return value check in stm32_pwr_regulator_probe()")
Signed-off-by: YAN SHI <m202071378@hust.edu.cn>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304111750.o2643eJN-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412033529.18890-1-m202071378@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cba6cfdc7c ]
An automated bot told me that there was a potential lockdep problem
with regulators. This was on the chromeos-5.15 kernel, but I see
nothing that would be different downstream compared to upstream. The
bot said:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:4/115 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff8083110170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/115:
#0: ffffff808006a948 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x520/0x1348
#1: ffffffc00e0a7cc0 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x55c/0x1348
#2: ffffff80828a2260 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0xd0/0x2a4
#3: ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 115 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 9292e52fa83c0e23762b2b3aa1bacf5787a4d5da
Hardware name: Google Quackingstick (rev0+) (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4ec
show_stack+0x34/0x50
dump_stack_lvl+0xdc/0x11c
dump_stack+0x1c/0x48
__lock_acquire+0x16d4/0x6c74
lock_acquire+0x208/0x750
__mutex_lock_common+0x11c/0x11f8
ww_mutex_lock+0xc0/0x440
create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
regulator_resolve_supply+0x654/0x7c4
regulator_register_resolve_supply+0x30/0x120
class_for_each_device+0x1b8/0x230
regulator_register+0x17a4/0x1f40
devm_regulator_register+0x60/0xd0
reg_fixed_voltage_probe+0x728/0xaec
platform_probe+0x150/0x1c8
really_probe+0x274/0xa20
__driver_probe_device+0x1dc/0x3f4
driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c0
__device_attach_driver+0x1ac/0x2c8
bus_for_each_drv+0x11c/0x190
__device_attach_async_helper+0x1e4/0x2a4
async_run_entry_fn+0xa0/0x3ac
process_one_work+0x638/0x1348
worker_thread+0x4a8/0x9c4
kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
The problem was first reported soon after we made many of the
regulators probe asynchronously, though nothing I've seen implies that
the problems couldn't have also happened even without that.
I haven't personally been able to reproduce the lockdep issue, but the
issue does look somewhat legitimate. Specifically, it looks like in
regulator_resolve_supply() we are holding a "rdev" lock while calling
set_supply() -> create_regulator() which grabs the lock of a
_different_ "rdev" (the one for our supply). This is not necessarily
safe from a lockdep perspective since there is no documented ordering
between these two locks.
In reality, we should always be locking a regulator before the
supplying regulator, so I don't expect there to be any real deadlocks
in practice. However, the regulator framework in general doesn't
express this to lockdep.
Let's fix the issue by simply grabbing the two locks involved in the
same way we grab multiple locks elsewhere in the regulator framework:
using the "wound/wait" mechanisms.
Fixes: eaa7995c52 ("regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.2.I30d8e1ca10cfbe5403884cdd192253a2e063eb9e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b83a1772be ]
When a codepath locks a rdev using ww_mutex_lock_slow() directly then
that codepath is responsible for incrementing the "ref_cnt" and also
setting the "mutex_owner" to "current".
The regulator core consistently got that right for "ref_cnt" but
didn't always get it right for "mutex_owner". Let's fix this.
It's unlikely that this truly matters because the "mutex_owner" is
only needed if we're going to do subsequent locking of the same
rdev. However, even though it's not truly needed it seems less
surprising if we consistently set "mutex_owner" properly.
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.1.I4e9d433ea26360c06dd1381d091c82bb1a4ce843@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 691c1fcda5 ]
This is very close to a straight revert of commit 218320fec2
("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on
regulators"). We've identified that patch as causing a boot speed
regression on sc7180-trogdor boards. While boot speed certainly isn't
more important than making sure that power sequencing is correct,
looking closely at the original change it doesn't seem to have been
fully justified. It mentions "cycling issues" without describing
exactly what the issues were. That means it's possible that the
cycling issues were really a problem that should be fixed in a
different way.
Let's take a careful look at how we should handle regulators that have
an off-on-delay and that are boot-on or always-on. Linux currently
doesn't have any way to identify whether a GPIO regulator was already
on when the kernel booted. That means that when the kernel boots we
probe a regulator, see that it wants boot-on / always-on we, and then
turn the regulator on. We could be in one of two cases when we do
this:
a) The regulator might have been left on by the bootloader and we're
ensuring that it stays on.
b) The regulator might have been left off by the bootloader and we're
just now turning it on.
For case a) we definitely don't need any sort of delay. For case b) we
_might_ need some delay in case the bootloader turned the regulator
off _right_ before booting the kernel. To get the proper delay for
case b) then we can just assume a `last_off` of 0, which is what it
gets initialized to by default.
As per above, we can't tell whether we're in case a) or case b) so
we'll assume the longer delay (case b). This basically puts the code
to how it was before commit 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix
off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"). However, we add
one important change: we make sure that the delay is actually honored
if `last_off` is 0. Though the original "cycling issues" cited were
vague, I'm hopeful that this important extra change will be enough to
fix the issues that the initial commit mentioned.
With this fix, I've confined that on a sc7180-trogdor board the delay
at boot goes down from 500 ms to ~250 ms. That's not as good as the 0
ms that we had prior to commit 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix
off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"), but it's probably
safer because we don't know if the bootloader turned the regulator off
right before booting.
One note is that it's possible that we could be in a state that's not
a) or b) if there are other issues in the kernel. The only one I can
think of is related to pinctrl. If the pinctrl driver being used on a
board isn't careful about avoiding glitches when setting up a pin then
it's possible that setting up a pin could cause the regulator to "turn
off" briefly immediately before the regulator probes. If this is
indeed causing problems then the pinctrl driver should be fixed,
perhaps in a similar way to what was done in commit d21f4b7ffc
("pinctrl: qcom: Avoid glitching lines when we first mux to output")
Fixes: 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators")
Cc: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313111806.1.I2eaad872be0932a805c239a7c7a102233fb0b03b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c5d5b55b3c ]
The support for TCS4525 regulator has been introduced with a wrong
ramp-rate mask, which has been defined as a logical expression instead
of a bit shift operation.
For clarity, fix it using GENMASK() macro.
Fixes: 914df8faa7 ("regulator: fan53555: Add TCS4525 DCDC support")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406171806.948290-4-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fb9a5060f ]
Since commit f2a9eb975a ("regulator: fan53555: Add support for
FAN53526") the driver makes use of the BIT() macro, but relies on the
bits header being implicitly included.
Explicitly pull the header in to avoid potential build failures in some
configurations.
While here, reorder include directives alphabetically.
Fixes: f2a9eb975a ("regulator: fan53555: Add support for FAN53526")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406171806.948290-3-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 02bcba0b9f ]
devm_clk_get() can return -EPROBE_DEFER. So it is better to return the
error code from devm_clk_get(), instead of a hard coded -ENOENT.
This gives more opportunities to successfully probe the driver.
Fixes: 8959e53244 ("regulator: fixed: add possibility to enable by clock")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/18459fae3d017a66313699c7c8456b28158b2dd0.1679819354.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 80d2c29e09 ]
For regulators with 'off-on-delay-us' the regulator framework currently
uses ktime_get() to determine how long the regulator has been off
before re-enabling it (after a delay if needed). A problem with using
ktime_get() is that it doesn't account for the time the system is
suspended. As a result a regulator with a longer 'off-on-delay' (e.g.
500ms) that was switched off during suspend might still incurr in a
delay on resume before it is re-enabled, even though the regulator
might have been off for hours. ktime_get_boottime() accounts for
suspend time, use it instead of ktime_get().
Fixes: a8ce7bd896 ("regulator: core: Fix off_on_delay handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230223003301.v2.1.I9719661b8eb0a73b8c416f9c26cf5bd8c0563f99@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 218320fec2 ]
Regulators marked with "regulator-always-on" or "regulator-boot-on"
as well as an "off-on-delay-us", may run into cycling issues that are
hard to detect.
This is caused by the "last_off" state not being initialized in this
case.
Fix the "last_off" initialization by setting it to the current kernel
time upon initialization, regardless of always_on/boot_on state.
Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/FAFD5B39-E9C4-47C7-ACF1-2A04CD59758D@kohlschutter.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 80d2c29e09 ("regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 261f06315c ]
While we currently assume that regulators with no control available are
just uncontionally enabled this isn't always as clearly displayed to
users as is desirable, for example the code for disabling unused
regulators will log that it is about to disable them. Clean this up a
bit by setting always_on during constraint evaluation if we have no
available mechanism for controlling the regualtor so things that check
the constraint will do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220325144637.1543496-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 80d2c29e09 ("regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e314e15a0b ]
The compiler has no way to know if "id" is within the array bounds of
the regulators array. Add a check for this and a build-time check that
the regulators and reg_voltage_map arrays are sized the same. Seen with
GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c: In function 's5m8767_pmic_probe':
../drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c:936:35: warning: array subscript [0, 36] is outside array bounds of 'struct regulator_desc[37]' [-Warray-bounds=]
936 | regulators[id].vsel_reg =
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230128005358.never.313-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fd8bcec5f ]
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen
with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] == MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127225203.never.864-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 02228f6aa6 ]
If the system does not come from reset (like when it is kexec()), the
regulator might have an IRQ waiting for us.
If we enable the IRQ handler before its structures are ready, we crash.
This patch fixes:
[ 1.141839] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000078
[ 1.316096] Call trace:
[ 1.316101] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0xa8
[ 1.322757] cpu cpu0: dummy supplies not allowed for exclusive requests
[ 1.327823] regulator_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
[ 1.327825] da9211_irq_handler+0x68/0xf8
[ 1.327829] irq_thread+0x11c/0x234
[ 1.327833] kthread+0x13c/0x154
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@dm.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124-da9211-v2-0-1779e3c5d491@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cb3543cff9 upstream.
When updating the operating mode as part of regulator enable, the caller
has already locked the regulator tree and drms_uA_update() must not try
to do the same in order not to trigger a deadlock.
The lock inversion is reported by lockdep as:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-next-20221215 #142 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
udevd/154 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffc11f123d7e50 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x280
but task is already holding lock:
ffff80000e4c36e8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable+0x34/0x80
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
just before probe of a Qualcomm UFS controller (occasionally) deadlocks
when enabling one of its regulators.
Fixes: 9243a195be ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215104646.19818-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 0591b14ce0 ]
I found a use_count leakage towards supply regulator of rdev with
boot-on option.
┌───────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐
│ regulator_dev A │ │ regulator_dev B │
│ (boot-on) │ │ (boot-on) │
│ use_count=0 │◀──supply──│ use_count=1 │
│ │ │ │
└───────────────────┘ └───────────────────┘
In case of rdev(A) configured with `regulator-boot-on', the use_count
of supplying regulator(B) will increment inside
regulator_enable(rdev->supply).
Thus, B will acts like always-on, and further balanced
regulator_enable/disable cannot actually disable it anymore.
However, B was also configured with `regulator-boot-on', we wish it
could be disabled afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201033806.2567812-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cf34ac6aa2 ]
The reg_node needs to be released through of_node_put() in the error
handling path when of_irq_get_byname() failed.
Fixes: 390af53e04 ("regulator: qcom-labibb: Implement short-circuit and over-current IRQs")
Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203062109.115043-1-yuancan@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit da46ee19cb ]
If create_regulator() fails in set_supply(), the module refcount
needs be put to keep refcount balanced.
Fixes: e2c09ae7a7 ("regulator: core: Increase refcount for regulator supply's module")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201122706.4055992-2-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit dc8d006d15 ]
Use kfree_const() to free supply_name conditionally in create_regulator()
as supply_name may be allocated from kmalloc() or directly from .rodata
section.
Fixes: 87fe29b61f ("regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside of lock")
Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123034616.3609537-1-bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit dd801b2265 ]
PMR735a has a wider range than previously defined. Fix it.
Fixes: c4e5aa3dbe ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add PM7325/PMR735A regulator support")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221110210706.80301-1-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f2b41b748c ]
I got the the following report:
OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2,
of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@62/regulators/exten
In of_get_regulator(), the node is returned from of_parse_phandle()
with refcount incremented, after using it, of_node_put() need be called.
Fixes: 69511a452e ("regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115091508.900752-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 31a6297b89 ]
Status is reported as always off in the 6032 case. Status
reporting now matches the logic in the setters. Once of
the differences to the 6030 is that there are no groups,
therefore the state needs to be read out in the lower bits.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120221208.3093727-3-andreas@kemnade.info
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0b24dfa587 ]
Sony's downstream driver [1], among some other changes, adds a
seemingly random 10ms usleep_range, which turned out to be necessary
for the hardware to function properly on at least Sony Xperia 1 IV.
Without this, I2C transactions with the SLG51000 straight up fail.
Relax (10-10ms -> 10-11ms) and add the aforementioned sleep to make
sure the hardware has some time to wake up.
(nagara-2.0.0-mlc/vendor/semc/hardware/camera-kernel-module/)
[1] https://developer.sony.com/file/download/open-source-archive-for-64-0-m-4-29/
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118131035.54874-1-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3d6c982b26 ]
In former times, info->feature was populated via the parent driver
by pdata/regulator_init_data->driver_data for all regulators when
USB_PRODUCT_ID_LSB indicates a TWL6032.
Today, the information is not set, so re-add it at the regulator
definitions.
Fixes: 25d8233770 ("regulator: twl: make driver DT only")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120221208.3093727-2-andreas@kemnade.info
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1f386d6894 ]
I got a UAF report as following:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810e838220 by task python3/268
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x67/0x83
print_report+0x178/0x4b0
kasan_report+0x90/0x190
__lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
lock_acquire+0x156/0x400
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
lockref_get+0x11/0x30
simple_recursive_removal+0x41/0x440
debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
_regulator_put.cold.54+0x3e/0x27f
regulator_put+0x1f/0x30
release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
devres_release_all+0xf8/0x150
Allocated by task 37:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
__kasan_slab_alloc+0x5d/0x70
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x62/0x510
kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x222/0x5a0
__d_alloc+0x31/0x440
d_alloc+0x30/0xf0
d_alloc_parallel+0xc4/0xd20
__lookup_slow+0x15e/0x2f0
lookup_one_len+0x13a/0x150
start_creating+0xea/0x190
debugfs_create_dir+0x1e/0x210
create_regulator+0x254/0x4e0
_regulator_get+0x2a1/0x467
_devm_regulator_get+0x5a/0xb0
regulator_virtual_probe+0xb9/0x1a0
Freed by task 30:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
__kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x190
kmem_cache_free+0xf6/0x600
rcu_core+0x54c/0x12b0
__do_softirq+0xf2/0x5e3
Last potentially related work creation:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
__kasan_record_aux_stack+0x98/0xb0
call_rcu+0x42/0x700
dentry_free+0x6c/0xd0
__dentry_kill+0x23b/0x2d0
dput.part.31+0x431/0x780
simple_recursive_removal+0xa9/0x440
debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
regulator_unregister+0xe3/0x230
release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
==================================================================
Here is how happened:
processor A processor B
regulator_register()
rdev_init_debugfs()
rdev->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir()
devm_regulator_get()
rdev = regulator_dev_lookup()
create_regulator(rdev)
// using rdev->debugfs as parent
debugfs_create_dir(rdev->debugfs)
mfd_remove_devices_fn()
release_nodes()
regulator_unregister()
// free rdev->debugfs
debugfs_remove_recursive(rdev->debugfs)
release_nodes()
destroy_regulator()
debugfs_remove_recursive() <- causes UAF
In devm_regulator_get(), after getting rdev, the refcount
is get, so fix this by moving debugfs_remove_recursive()
to regulator_dev_release(), then it can be proctected by
the refcount, the 'rdev->debugfs' can not be freed until
the refcount is 0.
Fixes: 5de705194e ("regulator: Add basic per consumer debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116033706.3595812-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5f4b204b6b ]
Here is a warning report about lack of registered release()
from kobject lib:
Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 48430 at drivers/base/core.c:2332 device_release+0x104/0x120
Call Trace:
kobject_put+0xdc/0x180
put_device+0x1b/0x30
regulator_register+0x651/0x1170
devm_regulator_register+0x4f/0xb0
When regulator_register() returns fail and directly goto `clean` symbol,
rdev->dev has not registered release() function yet (which is registered
by regulator_class in the following), so rdev needs to be freed manually.
If rdev->dev.of_node is not NULL, which means the of_node has gotten by
regulator_of_get_init_data(), it needs to call of_node_put() to avoid
refcount leak.
Otherwise, only calling put_device() would lead memory leak of rdev
in further:
unreferenced object 0xffff88810d0b1000 (size 2048):
comm "107-i2c-rtq6752", pid 48430, jiffies 4342258431 (age 1341.780s)
backtrace:
kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x110
regulator_register+0x184/0x1170
devm_regulator_register+0x4f/0xb0
When regulator_register() returns fail and goto `wash` symbol,
rdev->dev has registered release() function, so directly call
put_device() to cleanup everything.
Fixes: d3c731564e ("regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116074339.1024240-1-zengheng4@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8d8e165920 ]
By using a ratio of delay to poll_enabled_time that is not integer
time_remaining underflows and does not exit the loop as expected.
As delay could be derived from DT and poll_enabled_time is defined
in the driver this can easily happen.
Use a signed iterator to make sure that the loop exits once
the remaining time is negative.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909125954.577669-1-patrick.rudolph@9elements.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 8478ed5844 upstream.
On recent kernels, the PM8058 L16 (or any other PM8058 LDO-regulator)
does not come up if they are supplied by an SMPS-regulator. This
is not very strange since the regulators are registered in a long
array and the L-regulators are registered before the S-regulators,
and if an L-regulator defers, it will never get around to registering
the S-regulator that it needs.
See arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8060-dragonboard.dts:
pm8058-regulators {
(...)
vdd_l13_l16-supply = <&pm8058_s4>;
(...)
Ooops.
Fix this by moving the PM8058 S-regulators first in the array.
Do the same for the PM8901 S-regulators (though this is currently
not causing any problems with out device trees) so that the pattern
of registration order is the same on all PMnnnn chips.
Fixes: 087a1b5cdd ("regulator: qcom: Rework to single platform device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909112529.239143-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 78e1e867f4 ]
The pfuze_chip::regulator_descs is an array of size
PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR, the pfuze_chip::pfuze_regulators
is the pointer to the real regulators of a specific device.
The number of real regulator is supposed to be less than
the PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR, so we should use the size of
'regulator_num * sizeof(struct pfuze_regulator)' in memcpy().
This fixes the out of bounds access bug reported by KASAN.
Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220825111922.1368055-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c32f1ebfd2 ]
If regulator_enable() fails, enable_count is incremented still.
A consumer, assuming no matching regulator_disable() is necessary on
failure, will then get this error message upon regulator_put()
since enable_count is non-zero:
[ 1.277418] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at drivers/regulator/core.c:2304 _regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x170
The consumer could try to fix this in their driver by cleaning up on
error from regulator_enable() (i.e. call regulator_disable()), but that
results in the following since regulator_enable() failed and didn't
increment user_count:
[ 1.258112] unbalanced disables for vreg_l17c
[ 1.262606] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1 at drivers/regulator/core.c:2899 _regulator_disable+0xd4/0x190
Fix this by decrementing enable_count upon failure to enable.
With this in place, just the reason for failure to enable is printed
as expected and developers can focus on the root cause of their issue
instead of thinking their usage of the regulator consumer api is
incorrect. For example, in my case:
[ 1.240426] vreg_l17c: invalid input voltage found
Fixes: 5451781dad ("regulator: core: Only count load for enabled consumers")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220819194336.382740-1-ahalaney@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 66efb665cd ]
We should call the of_node_put() for the reference returned by
of_get_child_by_name() which has increased the refcount.
Fixes: 40e20d68bb ("regulator: of: Add support for parsing regulator_state for suspend state")
Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715111027.391032-1-windhl@126.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e8977917e1 ]
The PM8916 device specification [1] documents a programmable range of
1.75V to 3.337V with 12.5mV steps for the PMOS LDOs in PM8916. This
range is also used when controlling the regulator directly using the
qcom_spmi-regulator driver ("ult_pldo" there).
However, for some reason the qcom_smd-regulator driver allows a much
larger range for the same hardware component. This could be simply a
typo, since the start of the range is essentially just missing a '1'.
In practice this does not cause any major problems, since the driver
just sends the actual voltage to the RPM firmware instead of making use
of the incorrect voltage selector. Still, having the wrong range there
is confusing and prevents the regulator core from validating requests
correctly.
[1]: https://developer.qualcomm.com/download/sd410/pm8916pm8916-1-power-management-ic-device-specification.pdf
Fixes: 57d6567680 ("regulator: qcom-smd: Add PM8916 support")
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623094614.1410180-2-stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 68d6c8476f ]
of_find_node_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when done.
Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
Fixes: 0fbeae70ee ("regulator: add SCMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220516074433.32433-1-linmq006@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit afaa7b933e ]
of_node_get() returns a node with refcount incremented.
Calling of_node_put() to drop the reference when not needed anymore.
Fixes: 3784b6d64d ("regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze100 regulator driver")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511113506.45185-1-linmq006@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b11b3d21a9 ]
Following changes have been made:
- S5, L4, L18, L20 and L21 were removed (S5 is managed by
SPMI, whereas the rest seems not to exist [or at least it's blocked
by Sony Loire /MSM8956/ RPM firmware])
- Supply maps have were adjusted to reflect regulator changes.
Fixes: e44adca5fa ("regulator: qcom_smd: Add PM8950 regulators")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220430163753.609909-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Kalle Niemi
Biju Das
Matti Vaittinen
Krzysztof Kozlowski
Johan Hovold
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Martin Blumenstingl
Rui Zhang
Michał Mirosław
Geert Uytterhoeven
Osama Muhammad
Sen Chu
Alexander Stein
YAN SHI
Douglas Anderson
Cristian Ciocaltea
Christophe JAILLET
Matthias Kaehlcke
Christian Kohlschütter
Mark Brown
Kees Cook
Ricardo Ribalda
Yuan Can
Yang Yingliang
Wang ShaoBo
Konrad Dybcio
Andreas Kemnade
Zeng Heng
Patrick Rudolph
Linus Walleij
Xiaolei Wang
Andrew Halaney
Liang He
Stephan Gerhold
Miaoqian Lin
Konrad Dybcio