Граф коммитов

781699 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Eric W. Biederman 4445229445 signal/arc: Push siginfo generation into unhandled_exception
Pass signr, sicode, and address into unhandled_exception as explicit
parameters instead of members of struct siginfo.  Then in unhandled
exception generate and send the siginfo using force_sig_fault.

This keeps the code simpler and less error prone.

Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:59:17 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman a618a2754c signal/ia64: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:58:18 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman b92adb74ad signal/ia64: Use the force_sig(SIGSEGV,...) in ia64_rt_sigreturn
The ia64 handling of failure to return from a signal frame has been trying
to set overlapping fields in struct siginfo since 2.3.43.  The si_code
corresponds to the fields that were stomped (not the field that is
actually written), so I can not imagine a piece of userspace code
making sense of the signal frame if it looks closely.

In practice failure to return from a signal frame is a rare event that
almost never happens.  Someone using an alternate signal stack to
recover and looking in detail is even more rare.  So I presume no one
has ever noticed and reported this ia64 nonsense.

Sort this out by causing ia64 to use force_sig(SIGSEGV) like other architectures.

Fixes: 2.3.43
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:58:04 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 8b9c6b2831 signal/ia64: Use the generic force_sigsegv in setup_frame
The ia64 handling of failure to setup a signal frame has been trying
to set overlapping fields in struct siginfo since 2.3.43.  The si_pid
and si_uid fields are stomped when the si_addr field is set.  The
si_code of SI_KERNEL indicates that si_pid and si_uid should be valid,
and that si_addr does not exist.

Being at odds with the definition of SI_KERNEL and with nothing to
indicate that this was a signal frame setup failure there is no way
for userspace to know that si_addr was filled out instead.

In practice failure to setup a signal frame is rare, and si_pid and
si_uid are always set to 0 when si_code is SI_KERNEL so I expect no
one has looked closely enough before to see this weirdness.  Further
the only difference between force_sigsegv_info and the generic
force_sigsegv other than the return code is that force_sigsegv_info
stomps the si_uid and si_pid fields.

Remove the bug and simplify the code by using force_sigsegv in this
case just like other architectures.

Fixes: 2.3.43
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:57:52 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 795a837145 signal/arm/kvm: Use send_sig_mceerr
This simplifies the code making it clearer what is going on, and
making the siginfo generation easier to maintain.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:57:43 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman b059454846 signal/arm: Use send_sig_fault where appropriate
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:57:40 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 3ee6a44987 signal/arm: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:57:39 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 05e792e30e signal/arm: Push siginfo generation into arm_notify_die
In arm_notify_die call force_sig_fault to let the generic
code handle siginfo generation.

This removes some boiler plate making the code easier to
maintain in the long run.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:55:30 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman c852680959 signal/arm64: Use send_sig_fault where appropriate
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:55:23 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman f3a900b341 signal/arm64: Add and use arm64_force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap
Add arm64_force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap for consistency with
arm64_force_sig_fault and use it where appropriate.

This adds the show_signal logic to the force_sig_errno_trap case,
where it was apparently overlooked earlier.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:55:15 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 2627f0347c signal/arm64: In ptrace_hbptriggered name the signal description string
This will let the description be reused shortly.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:55:08 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 009f608ab2 signal/arm64: Remove arm64_force_sig_info
The function has no more callers so remove it.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:55:00 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman b4d5557caa signal/arm64: Add and use arm64_force_sig_mceerr as appropriate
Add arm64_force_sig_mceerr for consistency with arm64_force_sig_fault,
and use it in the one location that can take advantage of it.

This removes the fiddly filling out of siginfo before sending a signal
reporting an memory error to userspace.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:51 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman feca355b3d signal/arm64: Add and use arm64_force_sig_fault where appropriate
Wrap force_sig_fault with a helper that calls arm64_show_signal
and call arm64_force_sig_fault where appropraite.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:43 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 559d8d91a8 signal/arm64: Only call set_thread_esr once in do_page_fault
This code is truly common between the signal sending cases so share it.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:33 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 2d2837fab5 signal/arm64: Only perform one esr_to_fault_info call in do_page_fault
As this work is truly common between all of the signal sending cases
there is no need to repeat it between the different cases.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:26 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman effb093ad2 signal/arm64: Expand __do_user_fault and remove it
Not all of the signals passed to __do_user_fault can be handled
the same way so expand the now tiny __do_user_fault in it's callers
and remove it.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:18 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman aefab2b4c0 signal/arm64: For clarity separate the 3 signal sending cases in do_page_fault
It gets easy to confuse what is going on when some code is shared and some not
so stop sharing the trivial bits of signal generation to make future updates
easier to understand.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:10 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 9ea3a9743c signal/arm64: Consolidate the two hwpoison cases in do_page_fault
These two cases are practically the same and use siginfo differently
from the other signals sent from do_page_fault.  So consolidate them
to make future changes easier.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:54:02 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman f29ad209e4 signal/arm64: Factor set_thread_esr out of __do_user_fault
This pepares for sending signals with something other than
arm64_force_sig_info.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:53:54 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 1628a7cc85 signal/arm64: Factor out arm64_show_signal from arm64_force_sig_info
Filling in siginfo is error prone and so it is wise to use more
specialized helpers to do that work.  Factor out the arm specific
unhandled signal reporting from the work of delivering a signal so
the code can be modified to use functions that take the information
to fill out siginfo as parameters.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:53:46 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 24b8f79dd8 signal/arm64: Remove unneeded tsk parameter from arm64_force_sig_info
Every caller passes in current for tsk so there is no need to pass
tsk.  Instead make tsk a local variable initialized to current.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:53:35 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 6fa998e83e signal/arm64: Push siginfo generation into arm64_notify_die
Instead of generating a struct siginfo before calling arm64_notify_die
pass the signal number, tne sicode and the fault address into
arm64_notify_die and have it call force_sig_fault instead of
force_sig_info to let the generic code generate the struct siginfo.

This keeps code passing just the needed information into
siginfo generating code, making it easier to see what
is happening and harder to get wrong.  Further by letting
the generic code handle the generation of struct siginfo
it reduces the number of sites generating struct siginfo
making it possible to review them and verify that all
of the fiddly details for a structure passed to userspace
are handled properly.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-27 21:52:54 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman f383d8b4ae signal/powerpc: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:53:56 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 77c70728db signal/powerpc: Simplify _exception_pkey by using force_sig_pkuerr
Call force_sig_pkuerr directly instead of rolling it by hand
in _exception_pkey.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:53:00 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 5d8fb8a586 signal/powerpc: Specialize _exception_pkey for handling pkey exceptions
Now that _exception no longer calls _exception_pkey it is no longer
necessary to handle any signal with any si_code.  All pkey exceptions
are SIGSEGV with paired with SEGV_PKUERR.  So just handle
that case and remove the now unnecessary parameters from _exception_pkey.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:52:43 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman c1c7c85cea signal/powerpc: Call force_sig_fault from _exception
The callers of _exception don't need the pkey exception logic because
they are not processing a pkey exception.  So just call exception_common
directly and then call force_sig_fault to generate the appropriate siginfo
and deliver the appropriate signal.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:50:40 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 2c44ce285f signal/powerpc: Factor the common exception code into exception_common
It is brittle and wrong to populate si_pkey when there was not a pkey
exception.  The field does not exist for all si_codes and in some
cases another field exists in the same memory location.

So factor out the code that all exceptions handlers must run
into exception_common, leaving the individual exception handlers
to generate the signals themselves.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:50:26 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman cd60ab7abb signal/powerpc: Remove pkey parameter from __bad_area_nosemaphore
Now that bad_key_fault_exception no longer calls __bad_area_nosemaphore
there is no reason for __bad_area_nosemaphore to handle pkeys.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:49:28 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 8eb2ba25e3 signal/powerpc: Call _exception_pkey directly from bad_key_fault_exception
This removes the need for other code paths to deal with pkey exceptions.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:49:04 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 9f2ee69389 signal/powerpc: Remove pkey parameter from __bad_area
There are no callers of __bad_area that pass in a pkey parameter so it makes
no sense to take one.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:48:44 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman f654fc07db signal/powerpc: Use force_sig_mceerr as appropriate
In do_sigbus isolate the mceerr signaling code and call
force_sig_mceerr instead of falling through to the force_sig_info that
works for all of the other signals.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:48:19 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 0a996c1a3f signal/x86: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:30:54 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 419ceeb128 signal/x86: Pass pkey by value
Now that si_code == SEGV_PKUERR is the flag indicating that a pkey
is present there is no longer a need to pass a pointer to a local
pkey value, instead pkey can be passed more efficiently by value.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:29:57 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman b4fd52f25c signal/x86: Replace force_sig_info_fault with force_sig_fault
Now that the pkey handling has been removed force_sig_info_fault and
force_sig_fault perform identical work.  Just the type of the address
paramter is different.  So replace calls to force_sig_info_fault with
calls to force_sig_fault, and remove force_sig_info_fault.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:26:24 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 9db812dbb2 signal/x86: Call force_sig_pkuerr from __bad_area_nosemaphore
There is only one code path that can generate a pkuerr signal.  That
code path calls __bad_area_nosemaphore and can be dectected by testing
if si_code == SEGV_PKUERR.  It can be seen from inspection that all of
the other tests in fill_sig_info_pkey are unnecessary.

Therefore call force_sig_pkuerr directly from __bad_area_semaphore and
remove fill_sig_info_pkey.

At the same time move the comment above force_sig_info_pkey into
bad_area_access_error, so that the documentation about pkey generation
races is not lost.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 15:03:05 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman aba1ecd32c signal/x86: Pass pkey not vma into __bad_area
There is only one caller of __bad_area that passes in PKUERR and thus
will generate a siginfo with si_pkey set.  Therefore simplify the
logic and hoist reading of vma_pkey up into that caller, and just
pass *pkey into __bad_area.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:54:17 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 988bbc7b1a signal/x86: Don't compute pkey in __do_page_fault
There are no more users of the computed pkey value in __do_page_fault
so stop computing the value.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:52:12 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 25c102d803 signal/x86: Remove pkey parameter from mm_fault_error
After the previous cleanups to do_sigbus and and bad_area_nosemaphore
mm_fault_error no now longer uses it's pkey parameter.  Therefore
remove the unused parameter.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:51:42 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 27274f731c signal/x86: Remove the pkey parameter from do_sigbus
The function do_sigbus never sets si_code to PKUERR so it can never
return a pkey to userspace.  Therefore remove the unusable pkey
parameter from do_sigbus.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:48:44 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 768fd9c69b signal/x86: Remove pkey parameter from bad_area_nosemaphore
The function bad_area_nosemaphore always sets si_code to SEGV_MAPERR
and as such can never return a pkey parameter.  Therefore remove the
unusable pkey parameter from bad_area_nosemaphore.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:48:04 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 164881b614 signal/x86/traps: Simplify trap generation
Update the DO_ERROR macro to take si_code and si_addr values for a siginfo,
removing the need for the fill_trap_info function.

Update do_trap to also take the sicode and si_addr values for a sigininfo
and modify the code to call force_sig when a sicode is not passed in
and to call force_sig_fault when all of the information is present.

Making this a more obvious, simpler and less error prone construction.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:47:49 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman afe8448c0d signal/x86/traps: Use force_sig instead of open coding it.
The function "force_sig(sig, tsk)" is equivalent to "
force_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, tsk)".  Using the siginfo variants can
be error prone so use the simpler old fashioned force_sig variant,
and with luck the force_sig_info variant can go away.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:47:01 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 851ce9e697 signal/x86/traps: Use force_sig_bnderr
Instead of generating the siginfo in x86 specific code use the new
helper function force_sig_bnderr to separate the concerns of
collecting the information and generating a proper siginfo.

Making the code easier to understand and maintain.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:46:27 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 79e21d6540 signal/x86/traps: Move more code into do_trap_no_signal so it can be reused
The function do_trap_no_signal embodies almost all of the work of the
function do_trap.  The exceptions are setting of thread.error_code and
thread.trap_nr in the case when the signal will be sent, and reporting
which signal will be sent with show_signal.

Filling in struct siginfo and then calling do_trap is problematic as
filling in struct siginfo is an fiddly process that can through
inattention has resulted in fields not initialized and the wrong
fields being filled in.

To avoid this error prone situation I am replacing force_sig_info with
a set of functions that take as arguments the information needed to
send a specific kind of signal.

The function do_trap is called in the context of several different
kinds of signals today.  Having a solid do_trap_no_signal that
can be reused allows call sites that send different kinds of
signals to reuse all of the code in do_trap_no_signal.

Modify do_trap_no_signal to have a single exit there signals
where be sent (aka returning -1) to allow more of the signal
sending path to be moved to from do_trap to do_trap_no_signal.

Move setting thread.trap_nr and thread.error_code into do_trap_no_signal
so the code does not need to be duplicated.

Make the type of the string that is passed into do_trap_no_signal to
const.  The only user of that str is die and it already takes a const
string, so this just makes it explicit that the string won't change.

All of this prepares the way for using do_trap_no_signal outside
of do_trap.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-21 14:45:22 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 6ace1098a6 signal/x86/traps: Factor out show_signal
The code for conditionally printing unhanded signals is duplicated twice
in arch/x86/kernel/traps.c.  Factor it out into it's own subroutine
called show_signal to make the code clearer and easier to maintain.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-19 15:54:44 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 8d68fa0e08 signal/x86: Move mpx siginfo generation into do_bounds
This separates the logic of generating the signal from the logic of
gathering the information about the bounds violation.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-19 15:53:11 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 8a35eb22c0 signal/x86: In trace_mpx_bounds_register_exception add __user annotations
The value passed in to addr_referenced is of type void __user *, so update
the addr_referenced parameter in trace_mpx_bounds_register_exception to match.

Also update the addr_referenced paramater in TP_STRUCT__entry as it again
holdes the same value.

I don't know why this was missed earlier but sparse was complaining when
testing test branch so fix this now.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-19 15:52:21 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 585a8b9b48 signal/x86: Use send_sig_mceerr as apropriate
This simplifies the code making it clearer what is going on.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-19 15:51:33 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman 40e5539463 signal/x86: Move MCE error reporting out of force_sig_info_fault
Only the call from do_sigbus will send SIGBUS due to a memory machine
check error.  Consolidate all of the machine check signal generation
code in do_sigbus and remove the now unnecessary fault parameter from
force_sig_info_fault.

Explicitly use the now constant si_code BUS_ADRERR in the call
to force_sig_info_fault from do_sigbus.

This makes the code in arch/x86/mm/fault.c easier to follower and
simpler to maintain.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2018-09-19 15:50:08 +02:00