since we now have 32-bit support for e820_register_active_regions(),
we can merge the parsing of the mem=/memmap= boot parameters.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
this way 32-bit is more similar to 64-bit, and smarter e820 and numa.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
we don't need to call memory_present that early.
numa and sparse will call memory_present later and might
even fail, it will call memory_present for the full range.
also for sparse it will call alloc_bootmem ... before we set up bootmem.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
and make e820_mark_nosave_regions to take limit_pfn to use max_low_pfn
for 32bit and end_pfn for 64bit
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
converting MTRR layout from continous to discrete, some time could run out of
MTRRs. So add gran_sizek to prevent that by dumpping small RAM piece less than
gran_sizek.
previous trimming only can handle highest_pfn from mtrr to end_pfn from e820.
when have more than 4g RAM installed, there will be holes below 4g. so need to
check ram below 4g is coverred well.
need to be applied after
[PATCH] x86: mtrr cleanup for converting continuous to discrete layout v7
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The x86_64 code has centralized the memory setup code in
e820_64.c. This patch copies that approach to i386:
- early_param("mem", ...) parsing is moved from
setup_32.c to e820_32.c.
- setup_memory_map() and finish_e820_parsing() are
factored out from setup_arch(), and declarations
are added to e820_32.h.
- print_memory_map() is made static and removed from
e820_32.h.
- user_defined_memmap is marked as __initdata.
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
this function doesnt just 'find' the max_pfn - it also has
other side-effects such as registering sparse memory maps.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
fix the bug reported here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10232
use update_memory_range() instead of add_memory_range() directly
to avoid closing the gap.
( the new code only affects and runs on systems where the MTRR
workaround triggers. )
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
when MTRRs are not covering the whole e820 table, we need to trim the
RAM and need to update e820.
reuse some code on 64-bit as well.
here need to add early_get_cap and use it in early_cpu_detect, and move
mtrr_bp_init early.
The code successfully trimmed the memory map on Justin's system:
from:
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 000000022c000000 (usable)
to:
[ 0.000000] modified: 0000000100000000 - 0000000228000000 (usable)
[ 0.000000] modified: 0000000228000000 - 000000022c000000 (reserved)
According to Justin it makes quite a difference:
| When I boot the box without any trimming it acts like a 286 or 386,
| takes about 10 minutes to boot (using raptor disks).
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
Tested-by: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Because the EFI memory map are converted to e820 memory map in bootloader, the
EFI memory map handling code is removed to clean up.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This patch removes the extern struct resource declarations for
data_resource, code_resource and bss_resource on x86 and declares that
three structures as static as done on other architectures like IA64.
On i386, these structures are moved to setup_32.c (from e820_32.c) because
that's code that is not specific to e820 and also required on EFI systems.
That makes the "extern" reference superfluous.
On x86_64, data_resource, code_resource and bss_resource are passed to
e820_reserve_resources() as arguments just as done on i386 and IA64. That
also avoids the "extern" reference and it's possible to make it static.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To actually write a bootloader (or, say, the lguest launcher)
currently requires duplication of these structures. Making them
includable from userspace is much nicer.
We merge the common userspace-required definitions of e820_32/64.h
into e820.h for export.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the
header install make rules
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Yinghai Lu
Yinghai Lu
Alexander van Heukelum
Ingo Molnar
Joe Perches
Yinghai Lu
Huang, Ying
Bernhard Walle
Rusty Russell
Thomas Gleixner